137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20508320)
1. Improved dose-calculation accuracy in proton treatment planning using a simplified Monte Carlo method verified with three-dimensional measurements in an anthropomorphic phantom.
Hotta K; Kohno R; Takada Y; Hara Y; Tansho R; Himukai T; Kameoka S; Matsuura T; Nishio T; Ogino T
Phys Med Biol; 2010 Jun; 55(12):3545-56. PubMed ID: 20508320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Clinical implementation of full Monte Carlo dose calculation in proton beam therapy.
Paganetti H; Jiang H; Parodi K; Slopsema R; Engelsman M
Phys Med Biol; 2008 Sep; 53(17):4825-53. PubMed ID: 18701772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Monte Carlo simulations for configuring and testing an analytical proton dose-calculation algorithm.
Newhauser W; Fontenot J; Zheng Y; Polf J; Titt U; Koch N; Zhang X; Mohan R
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Aug; 52(15):4569-84. PubMed ID: 17634651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Validation of dose planning calculations for boron neutron capture therapy using cylindrical and anthropomorphic phantoms.
Koivunoro H; Seppälä T; Uusi-Simola J; Merimaa K; Kotiluoto P; Serén T; Kortesniemi M; Auterinen I; Savolainen S
Phys Med Biol; 2010 Jun; 55(12):3515-33. PubMed ID: 20508317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A comparison of electron beam dose calculation accuracy between treatment planning systems using either a pencil beam or a Monte Carlo algorithm.
Ding GX; Cygler JE; Yu CW; Kalach NI; Daskalov G
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2005 Oct; 63(2):622-33. PubMed ID: 16168854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Application of dose kernel calculation using a simplified Monte Carlo method to treatment plan for scanned proton beams.
Mizutani S; Takada Y; Kohno R; Hotta K; Tansho R; Akimoto T
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2016 Mar; 17(2):315-327. PubMed ID: 27074456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Experimental verification of dose calculation using the simplified Monte Carlo method with an improved initial beam model for a beam-wobbling system.
Tansho R; Takada Y; Kohno R; Hotta K; Hara Y; Mizutani S; Akimoto T
Phys Med Biol; 2013 Sep; 58(17):6047-64. PubMed ID: 23939011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Monte Carlo- versus pencil-beam-/collapsed-cone-dose calculation in a heterogeneous multi-layer phantom.
Krieger T; Sauer OA
Phys Med Biol; 2005 Mar; 50(5):859-68. PubMed ID: 15798260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Advanced kernel methods vs. Monte Carlo-based dose calculation for high energy photon beams.
Fotina I; Winkler P; Künzler T; Reiterer J; Simmat I; Georg D
Radiother Oncol; 2009 Dec; 93(3):645-53. PubMed ID: 19926153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Dose calculation accuracy of the Monte Carlo algorithm for CyberKnife compared with other commercially available dose calculation algorithms.
Sharma S; Ott J; Williams J; Dickow D
Med Dosim; 2011; 36(4):347-50. PubMed ID: 21144731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Monte Carlo simulations of a nozzle for the treatment of ocular tumours with high-energy proton beams.
Newhauser W; Koch N; Hummel S; Ziegler M; Titt U
Phys Med Biol; 2005 Nov; 50(22):5229-49. PubMed ID: 16264250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Clinical implementation of a GPU-based simplified Monte Carlo method for a treatment planning system of proton beam therapy.
Kohno R; Hotta K; Nishioka S; Matsubara K; Tansho R; Suzuki T
Phys Med Biol; 2011 Nov; 56(22):N287-94. PubMed ID: 22036894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. AAA and PBC calculation accuracy in the surface build-up region in tangential beam treatments. Phantom and breast case study with the Monte Carlo code PENELOPE.
Panettieri V; Barsoum P; Westermark M; Brualla L; Lax I
Radiother Oncol; 2009 Oct; 93(1):94-101. PubMed ID: 19541380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A pencil beam algorithm for intensity modulated proton therapy derived from Monte Carlo simulations.
Soukup M; Fippel M; Alber M
Phys Med Biol; 2005 Nov; 50(21):5089-104. PubMed ID: 16237243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A beam source model for scanned proton beams.
Kimstrand P; Traneus E; Ahnesjö A; Grusell E; Glimelius B; Tilly N
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Jun; 52(11):3151-68. PubMed ID: 17505095
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Monte Carlo dose calculations for spot scanned proton therapy.
Tourovsky A; Lomax AJ; Schneider U; Pedroni E
Phys Med Biol; 2005 Mar; 50(5):971-81. PubMed ID: 15798269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A Monte Carlo pencil beam scanning model for proton treatment plan simulation using GATE/GEANT4.
Grevillot L; Bertrand D; Dessy F; Freud N; Sarrut D
Phys Med Biol; 2011 Aug; 56(16):5203-19. PubMed ID: 21791731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A particle track-repeating algorithm for proton beam dose calculation.
Li JS; Shahine B; Fourkal E; Ma CM
Phys Med Biol; 2005 Mar; 50(5):1001-10. PubMed ID: 15798272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Dosimetric verification of IMRT treatment planning using Monte Carlo simulations for prostate cancer.
Yang J; Li J; Chen L; Price R; McNeeley S; Qin L; Wang L; Xiong W; Ma CM
Phys Med Biol; 2005 Mar; 50(5):869-78. PubMed ID: 15798261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A simplified Monte Carlo algorithm considering large-angle scattering for fast and accurate calculation of proton dose.
Takayanagi T; Hirayama S; Fujitaka S; Fujimoto R
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2018 Jan; 19(1):60-72. PubMed ID: 29178595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
