These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

102 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2050870)

  • 1. Wear measurements in clinical studies of composite resin restorations in the posterior region: a review.
    Kreulen CM; van Amerongen WE
    ASDC J Dent Child; 1991; 58(2):109-23. PubMed ID: 2050870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Three-year randomized clinical trial to evaluate the clinical performance and wear of a nanocomposite versus a hybrid composite.
    Palaniappan S; Bharadwaj D; Mattar DL; Peumans M; Van Meerbeek B; Lambrechts P
    Dent Mater; 2009 Nov; 25(11):1302-14. PubMed ID: 19577288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [An in vitro study of wear and marginal fracture of posterior composite resins].
    Futatsuki M; Nakata M
    Shoni Shikagaku Zasshi; 1990; 28(4):937-48. PubMed ID: 2134129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Two-year performance of glass-ceramic insert-resin composite restorations: clinical and scanning electron microscopic evaluation.
    Kiremitçi A; Bolay S; Gürgan S
    Quintessence Int; 1998 Jul; 29(7):417-21. PubMed ID: 9759057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Clinical and SEM study of Tetric resin composite in posterior teeth: 12-month results.
    Krejci I; Besek M; Lutz F
    Am J Dent; 1994 Feb; 7(1):27-30. PubMed ID: 9115675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Composite resin-amalgam compound restorations.
    Franchi M; Trisi P; Montanari G; Piattelli A
    Quintessence Int; 1994 Aug; 25(8):577-82. PubMed ID: 7568708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. In vivo evaluation of the surface of posterior resin composite restorations: a pilot study.
    Pesun IJ; Olson AK; Hodges JS; Anderson GC
    J Prosthet Dent; 2000 Sep; 84(3):353-9. PubMed ID: 11005910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Clinical evaluation of direct cuspal coverage with posterior composite resin restorations.
    Deliperi S; Bardwell DN
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2006; 18(5):256-65; discussion 266-7. PubMed ID: 16987320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Occlusal glass ionomer cermet, resin sandwich and amalgam restorations: a 2-year clinical study.
    Lidums A; Wilkie R; Smales R
    Am J Dent; 1993 Aug; 6(4):185-8. PubMed ID: 7803005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The influence of different base materials on marginal adaptation and wear of conventional Class II composite resin restorations.
    Krejci I; Lutz F; Krejci D
    Quintessence Int; 1988 Mar; 19(3):191-8. PubMed ID: 3269574
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Reducing microleakage in composite resin restorations: an in vitro study.
    Unlu N; Krakaya S; Ozer F; Say EC
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2003 Dec; 11(4):171-5. PubMed ID: 14737794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Micromorphological evaluation of posterior composite restorations - a 10-year report.
    Gaengler P; Hoyer I; Montag R; Gaebler P
    J Oral Rehabil; 2004 Oct; 31(10):991-1000. PubMed ID: 15387840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A review of polymerization shrinkage stress: current techniques for posterior direct resin restorations.
    Giachetti L; Scaminaci Russo D; Bambi C; Grandini R
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2006 Sep; 7(4):79-88. PubMed ID: 16957794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Class II glass ionomer cermet tunnel, resin sandwich and amalgam restorations over 2 years.
    Wilkie R; Lidums A; Smales R
    Am J Dent; 1993 Aug; 6(4):181-4. PubMed ID: 7803004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of occlusal marginal adaptation of Class II resin-composite restorations.
    Kreulen CM; van Amerongen WE; Akerboom HB; Borgmeijer PJ; Gruythuysen RJ
    ASDC J Dent Child; 1993; 60(4-5):310-4. PubMed ID: 8258575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Clinical evaluation of a highly wear resistant composite.
    Dickinson GL; Gerbo LR; Leinfelder KF
    Am J Dent; 1993 Apr; 6(2):85-7. PubMed ID: 8397989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of glass inserts on resin composite wear.
    Kawai K; Leinfelder KF
    Am J Dent; 1995 Oct; 8(5):249-52. PubMed ID: 8634161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A clinical evaluation of posterior composite restorations: 17-year findings.
    da Rosa Rodolpho PA; Cenci MS; Donassollo TA; Loguércio AD; Demarco FF
    J Dent; 2006 Aug; 34(7):427-35. PubMed ID: 16314023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Fatigue behavior of the resin-resin bond of partially replaced resin-based composite restorations.
    Frankenberger R; Krämer N; Ebert J; Lohbauer U; Käppel S; ten Weges S; Petschelt A
    Am J Dent; 2003 Feb; 16(1):17-22. PubMed ID: 12744407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Polishing occlusal surfaces of direct Class II composite restorations in vivo.
    Jung M; Hornung K; Klimek J
    Oper Dent; 2005; 30(2):139-46. PubMed ID: 15853097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.