426 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20508954)
1. Total disc replacement surgery for symptomatic degenerative lumbar disc disease: a systematic review of the literature.
van den Eerenbeemt KD; Ostelo RW; van Royen BJ; Peul WC; van Tulder MW
Eur Spine J; 2010 Aug; 19(8):1262-80. PubMed ID: 20508954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Artificial discs for lumbar and cervical degenerative disc disease -update: an evidence-based analysis.
Medical Advisory Secretariat
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser; 2006; 6(10):1-98. PubMed ID: 23074480
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Mid- to long-term results of total lumbar disc replacement: a prospective analysis with 5- to 10-year follow-up.
Siepe CJ; Heider F; Wiechert K; Hitzl W; Ishak B; Mayer MH
Spine J; 2014 Aug; 14(8):1417-31. PubMed ID: 24448028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A meta-analysis of artificial total disc replacement versus fusion for lumbar degenerative disc disease.
Yajun W; Yue Z; Xiuxin H; Cui C
Eur Spine J; 2010 Aug; 19(8):1250-61. PubMed ID: 20364392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Prospective, randomized, multicenter Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemption study of lumbar total disc replacement with the CHARITE artificial disc versus lumbar fusion: five-year follow-up.
Guyer RD; McAfee PC; Banco RJ; Bitan FD; Cappuccino A; Geisler FH; Hochschuler SH; Holt RT; Jenis LG; Majd ME; Regan JJ; Tromanhauser SG; Wong DC; Blumenthal SL
Spine J; 2009 May; 9(5):374-86. PubMed ID: 18805066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A prospective, randomized, multicenter Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemption study of lumbar total disc replacement with the CHARITE artificial disc versus lumbar fusion: part II: evaluation of radiographic outcomes and correlation of surgical technique accuracy with clinical outcomes.
McAfee PC; Cunningham B; Holsapple G; Adams K; Blumenthal S; Guyer RD; Dmietriev A; Maxwell JH; Regan JJ; Isaza J
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2005 Jul; 30(14):1576-83; discussion E388-90. PubMed ID: 16025025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A prospective, randomized, multicenter Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemptions study of lumbar total disc replacement with the CHARITE artificial disc versus lumbar fusion: part I: evaluation of clinical outcomes.
Blumenthal S; McAfee PC; Guyer RD; Hochschuler SH; Geisler FH; Holt RT; Garcia R; Regan JJ; Ohnmeiss DD
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2005 Jul; 30(14):1565-75; discussion E387-91. PubMed ID: 16025024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Mid- to long-term results of total disc replacement for lumbar degenerative disc disease: a systematic review.
Cui XD; Li HT; Zhang W; Zhang LL; Luo ZP; Yang HL
J Orthop Surg Res; 2018 Dec; 13(1):326. PubMed ID: 30585142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Prospective, randomized, multicenter Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemption study of the ProDisc-L total disc replacement compared with circumferential arthrodesis for the treatment of two-level lumbar degenerative disc disease: results at twenty-four months.
Delamarter R; Zigler JE; Balderston RA; Cammisa FP; Goldstein JA; Spivak JM
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2011 Apr; 93(8):705-15. PubMed ID: 21398574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. An 11-year minimum follow-up of the Charite III lumbar disc replacement for the treatment of symptomatic degenerative disc disease.
Lu SB; Hai Y; Kong C; Wang QY; Su Q; Zang L; Kang N; Meng XL; Wang Y
Eur Spine J; 2015 Sep; 24(9):2056-64. PubMed ID: 25895882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Five-year Results of a Randomized Controlled Trial for Lumbar Artificial Discs in Single-level Degenerative Disc Disease.
Yue JJ; Garcia R; Blumenthal S; Coric D; Patel VV; Dinh DH; Buttermann GR; Deutsch H; Miller LE; Persaud EJ; Ferko NC
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2019 Dec; 44(24):1685-1696. PubMed ID: 31404055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Prospective, randomized trial of metal-on-metal artificial lumbar disc replacement: initial results for treatment of discogenic pain.
Sasso RC; Foulk DM; Hahn M
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Jan; 33(2):123-31. PubMed ID: 18197095
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Lumbar disc arthroplasty versus anterior lumbar interbody fusion: 5-year outcomes for patients in the Maverick disc investigational device exemption study.
Gornet MF; Burkus JK; Dryer RF; Peloza JH; Schranck FW; Copay AG
J Neurosurg Spine; 2019 May; 31(3):347-356. PubMed ID: 31100723
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Five-year adjacent-level degenerative changes in patients with single-level disease treated using lumbar total disc replacement with ProDisc-L versus circumferential fusion.
Zigler JE; Glenn J; Delamarter RB
J Neurosurg Spine; 2012 Dec; 17(6):504-11. PubMed ID: 23082849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Total disc replacement versus multidisciplinary rehabilitation in patients with chronic low back pain and degenerative discs: 8-year follow-up of a randomized controlled multicenter trial.
Furunes H; Storheim K; Brox JI; Johnsen LG; Skouen JS; Franssen E; Solberg TK; Sandvik L; Hellum C
Spine J; 2017 Oct; 17(10):1480-1488. PubMed ID: 28583869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparative charge analysis of one- and two-level lumbar total disc arthroplasty versus circumferential lumbar fusion.
Levin DA; Bendo JA; Quirno M; Errico T; Goldstein J; Spivak J
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Dec; 32(25):2905-9. PubMed ID: 18246016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of artificial total disc replacement versus fusion for lumbar degenerative disc disease: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Wei J; Song Y; Sun L; Lv C
Int Orthop; 2013 Jul; 37(7):1315-25. PubMed ID: 23645003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Segmental contribution toward total lumbar range of motion in disc replacement and fusions: a comparison of operative and adjacent levels.
Auerbach JD; Jones KJ; Milby AH; Anakwenze OA; Balderston RA
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Nov; 34(23):2510-7. PubMed ID: 19927100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Advanced meta-analyses comparing the three surgical techniques total disc replacement, anterior stand-alone fusion and circumferential fusion regarding pain, function and complications up to 3 years to treat lumbar degenerative disc disease.
Lang SAJ; Bohn T; Barleben L; Pumberger M; Roll S; Büttner-Janz K
Eur Spine J; 2021 Dec; 30(12):3688-3701. PubMed ID: 33837832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Total disc replacement for chronic back pain in the presence of disc degeneration.
Jacobs W; Van der Gaag NA; Tuschel A; de Kleuver M; Peul W; Verbout AJ; Oner FC
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2012 Sep; (9):CD008326. PubMed ID: 22972118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
