These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

430 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20508954)

  • 1. Total disc replacement surgery for symptomatic degenerative lumbar disc disease: a systematic review of the literature.
    van den Eerenbeemt KD; Ostelo RW; van Royen BJ; Peul WC; van Tulder MW
    Eur Spine J; 2010 Aug; 19(8):1262-80. PubMed ID: 20508954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Artificial discs for lumbar and cervical degenerative disc disease -update: an evidence-based analysis.
    Medical Advisory Secretariat
    Ont Health Technol Assess Ser; 2006; 6(10):1-98. PubMed ID: 23074480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Mid- to long-term results of total lumbar disc replacement: a prospective analysis with 5- to 10-year follow-up.
    Siepe CJ; Heider F; Wiechert K; Hitzl W; Ishak B; Mayer MH
    Spine J; 2014 Aug; 14(8):1417-31. PubMed ID: 24448028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A meta-analysis of artificial total disc replacement versus fusion for lumbar degenerative disc disease.
    Yajun W; Yue Z; Xiuxin H; Cui C
    Eur Spine J; 2010 Aug; 19(8):1250-61. PubMed ID: 20364392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Prospective, randomized, multicenter Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemption study of lumbar total disc replacement with the CHARITE artificial disc versus lumbar fusion: five-year follow-up.
    Guyer RD; McAfee PC; Banco RJ; Bitan FD; Cappuccino A; Geisler FH; Hochschuler SH; Holt RT; Jenis LG; Majd ME; Regan JJ; Tromanhauser SG; Wong DC; Blumenthal SL
    Spine J; 2009 May; 9(5):374-86. PubMed ID: 18805066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A prospective, randomized, multicenter Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemption study of lumbar total disc replacement with the CHARITE artificial disc versus lumbar fusion: part II: evaluation of radiographic outcomes and correlation of surgical technique accuracy with clinical outcomes.
    McAfee PC; Cunningham B; Holsapple G; Adams K; Blumenthal S; Guyer RD; Dmietriev A; Maxwell JH; Regan JJ; Isaza J
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2005 Jul; 30(14):1576-83; discussion E388-90. PubMed ID: 16025025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A prospective, randomized, multicenter Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemptions study of lumbar total disc replacement with the CHARITE artificial disc versus lumbar fusion: part I: evaluation of clinical outcomes.
    Blumenthal S; McAfee PC; Guyer RD; Hochschuler SH; Geisler FH; Holt RT; Garcia R; Regan JJ; Ohnmeiss DD
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2005 Jul; 30(14):1565-75; discussion E387-91. PubMed ID: 16025024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Mid- to long-term results of total disc replacement for lumbar degenerative disc disease: a systematic review.
    Cui XD; Li HT; Zhang W; Zhang LL; Luo ZP; Yang HL
    J Orthop Surg Res; 2018 Dec; 13(1):326. PubMed ID: 30585142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Prospective, randomized, multicenter Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemption study of the ProDisc-L total disc replacement compared with circumferential arthrodesis for the treatment of two-level lumbar degenerative disc disease: results at twenty-four months.
    Delamarter R; Zigler JE; Balderston RA; Cammisa FP; Goldstein JA; Spivak JM
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2011 Apr; 93(8):705-15. PubMed ID: 21398574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. An 11-year minimum follow-up of the Charite III lumbar disc replacement for the treatment of symptomatic degenerative disc disease.
    Lu SB; Hai Y; Kong C; Wang QY; Su Q; Zang L; Kang N; Meng XL; Wang Y
    Eur Spine J; 2015 Sep; 24(9):2056-64. PubMed ID: 25895882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Five-year Results of a Randomized Controlled Trial for Lumbar Artificial Discs in Single-level Degenerative Disc Disease.
    Yue JJ; Garcia R; Blumenthal S; Coric D; Patel VV; Dinh DH; Buttermann GR; Deutsch H; Miller LE; Persaud EJ; Ferko NC
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2019 Dec; 44(24):1685-1696. PubMed ID: 31404055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Prospective, randomized trial of metal-on-metal artificial lumbar disc replacement: initial results for treatment of discogenic pain.
    Sasso RC; Foulk DM; Hahn M
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Jan; 33(2):123-31. PubMed ID: 18197095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Five-year adjacent-level degenerative changes in patients with single-level disease treated using lumbar total disc replacement with ProDisc-L versus circumferential fusion.
    Zigler JE; Glenn J; Delamarter RB
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2012 Dec; 17(6):504-11. PubMed ID: 23082849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Total disc replacement versus multidisciplinary rehabilitation in patients with chronic low back pain and degenerative discs: 8-year follow-up of a randomized controlled multicenter trial.
    Furunes H; Storheim K; Brox JI; Johnsen LG; Skouen JS; Franssen E; Solberg TK; Sandvik L; Hellum C
    Spine J; 2017 Oct; 17(10):1480-1488. PubMed ID: 28583869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparative charge analysis of one- and two-level lumbar total disc arthroplasty versus circumferential lumbar fusion.
    Levin DA; Bendo JA; Quirno M; Errico T; Goldstein J; Spivak J
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Dec; 32(25):2905-9. PubMed ID: 18246016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Lumbar disc arthroplasty versus anterior lumbar interbody fusion: 5-year outcomes for patients in the Maverick disc investigational device exemption study.
    Gornet MF; Burkus JK; Dryer RF; Peloza JH; Schranck FW; Copay AG
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2019 Sep; 31(3):347-356. PubMed ID: 31100723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of artificial total disc replacement versus fusion for lumbar degenerative disc disease: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
    Wei J; Song Y; Sun L; Lv C
    Int Orthop; 2013 Jul; 37(7):1315-25. PubMed ID: 23645003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Segmental contribution toward total lumbar range of motion in disc replacement and fusions: a comparison of operative and adjacent levels.
    Auerbach JD; Jones KJ; Milby AH; Anakwenze OA; Balderston RA
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Nov; 34(23):2510-7. PubMed ID: 19927100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Advanced meta-analyses comparing the three surgical techniques total disc replacement, anterior stand-alone fusion and circumferential fusion regarding pain, function and complications up to 3 years to treat lumbar degenerative disc disease.
    Lang SAJ; Bohn T; Barleben L; Pumberger M; Roll S; Büttner-Janz K
    Eur Spine J; 2021 Dec; 30(12):3688-3701. PubMed ID: 33837832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Total disc replacement for chronic back pain in the presence of disc degeneration.
    Jacobs W; Van der Gaag NA; Tuschel A; de Kleuver M; Peul W; Verbout AJ; Oner FC
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2012 Sep; (9):CD008326. PubMed ID: 22972118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 22.