These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
202 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20509149)
21. Comparison of quantitative fluorescent polymerase chain reaction and karyotype analysis for prenatal screening of chromosomal aneuploidies in 270 amniotic fluid samples. Masoudzadeh N; Teimourian S J Perinat Med; 2019 Aug; 47(6):631-636. PubMed ID: 31194688 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Detection of mosaicism for primary trisomies in prenatal samples by QF-PCR and karyotype analysis. Donaghue C; Mann K; Docherty Z; Ogilvie CM Prenat Diagn; 2005 Jan; 25(1):65-72. PubMed ID: 15662691 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. [Application of multiple quantitative fluorescence polymerase chain reaction approach for rapid prenatal diagnosis of common chromosome aneuploidies]. Hu T; Liu H; Zhu H; Wang J; Zhang H; Zhu Q; Lai Y; Qin L; Wang H; Liu S Zhonghua Yi Xue Yi Chuan Xue Za Zhi; 2014 Apr; 31(2):214-8. PubMed ID: 24711035 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Fetal nuchal translucency scan and early prenatal diagnosis of chromosomal abnormalities by rapid aneuploidy screening: observational study. Chitty LS; Kagan KO; Molina FS; Waters JJ; Nicolaides KH BMJ; 2006 Feb; 332(7539):452-5. PubMed ID: 16476673 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Prenatal diagnosis of common aneuploidies using multiplex quantitative fluorescent polymerase chain reaction. El Mouatassim S; Becker M; Kuzio S; Ronsin C; Gil S; Nouchy M; Druard L; Forestier F Fetal Diagn Ther; 2004; 19(6):496-503. PubMed ID: 15539874 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. The detection of mosaicism by prenatal BoBs™. Cheng YK; Wong C; Wong HK; Leung KO; Kwok YK; Suen A; Wang CC; Leung TY; Choy KW Prenat Diagn; 2013 Jan; 33(1):42-9. PubMed ID: 23168997 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Rapid detection of chromosome aneuploidies by quantitative fluorescence PCR: first application on 247 chorionic villus samples. Pertl B; Kopp S; Kroisel PM; Tului L; Brambati B; Adinolfi M J Med Genet; 1999 Apr; 36(4):300-3. PubMed ID: 10227397 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Prenatal diagnosis by rapid aneuploidy detection and karyotyping: a prospective study of the role of ultrasound in 1589 second-trimester amniocenteses. Leung WC; Waters JJ; Chitty L Prenat Diagn; 2004 Oct; 24(10):790-5. PubMed ID: 15503279 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Development of quantitative-fluorescence polymerase chain reaction for the rapid prenatal diagnosis of common chromosomal aneuploidies in 1,000 samples in Singapore. Baig S; Ho SS; Ng BL; Chiu L; Koay ES; Leow GH; Gole L; Kothandaraman N; Chan J; Sun X; Chan YH; Rauff M; Su LL; Biswas A; Choolani M Singapore Med J; 2010 Apr; 51(4):343-8. PubMed ID: 20505915 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Maternal cell contamination of prenatal samples assessed by QF-PCR genotyping. Stojilkovic-Mikic T; Mann K; Docherty Z; Mackie Ogilvie C Prenat Diagn; 2005 Jan; 25(1):79-83. PubMed ID: 15662689 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Diagnostic performance of quantitative fluorescence PCR analysis in high-risk pregnancies after combined first-trimester screening. Lildballe DL; Vogel I; Petersen OB; Vestergaard EM Dan Med J; 2014 Nov; 61(11):A4964. PubMed ID: 25370964 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. An algorithm for the prenatal detection of chromosome anomalies by QF-PCR and G-banded analysis. Speevak MD; Dolling J; Terespolsky D; Blumenthal A; Farrell SA Prenat Diagn; 2008 Dec; 28(13):1221-6. PubMed ID: 19039827 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Rapid aneuploidy testing versus traditional karyotyping in amniocentesis for certain referral indications. Comas C; Echevarria M; Carrera M; Serra B J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2010 Sep; 23(9):949-55. PubMed ID: 20718579 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Diagnostic accuracy of the BACs-on-Beads™ assay versus karyotyping for prenatal detection of chromosomal abnormalities: a retrospective consecutive case series. Choy KW; Kwok YK; Cheng YK; Wong KM; Wong HK; Leung KO; Suen KW; Adler K; Wang CC; Lau TK; Schermer MJ; Lao TT; Leung TY BJOG; 2014 Sep; 121(10):1245-52. PubMed ID: 24893808 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. A prospective analysis of cell-free fetal DNA concentration in maternal plasma as an indicator for adverse pregnancy outcome. Bauer M; Hutterer G; Eder M; Majer S; Leshane E; Johnson KL; Peter I; Bianchi DW; Pertl B Prenat Diagn; 2006 Sep; 26(9):831-6. PubMed ID: 16832830 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Quantitative-fluorescent-PCR versus full karyotyping in prenatal diagnosis of common chromosome aneuploidies in southern Spain. de la Paz-Gallardo MJ; García FS; de Haro-Muñoz T; Padilla-Vinuesa MC; Zafra-Ceres M; Gomez-Capilla JA; Gomez-Llorente C Clin Chem Lab Med; 2015 Aug; 53(9):1333-8. PubMed ID: 25460287 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Chromosome aberrations identified by cytogenetic analysis of the first two clones of cultured amniotic fluid cells compared with QF-PCR results. Jenderny J; Schmidt W; Kochhan L Cytogenet Genome Res; 2014; 142(4):239-44. PubMed ID: 24853086 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Development and targeted application of a rapid QF-PCR test for sex chromosome imbalance. Donaghue C; Roberts A; Mann K; Ogilvie CM Prenat Diagn; 2003 Mar; 23(3):201-10. PubMed ID: 12627420 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Validation of QF-PCR for prenatal aneuploidy screening in the United States. Brown L; Abigania M; Warburton D; Brown S Prenat Diagn; 2006 Nov; 26(11):1068-74. PubMed ID: 16952193 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Complete discrepancy between QF-PCR analysis of uncultured villi and karyotyping of cultured cells in the prenatal diagnosis of trisomy 21 in three CVS. Waters JJ; Mann K; Grimsley L; Ogilvie CM; Donaghue C; Staples L; Hills A; Adams T; Wilson C Prenat Diagn; 2007 Apr; 27(4):332-9. PubMed ID: 17286305 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]