These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

345 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20509583)

  • 1. Evaluating the effect of interactive audience response systems on the perceived learning experience of nursing students.
    Porter AG; Tousman S
    J Nurs Educ; 2010 Sep; 49(9):523-7. PubMed ID: 20509583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Promoting active learning using audience response system in large bioscience classes.
    Efstathiou N; Bailey C
    Nurse Educ Today; 2012 Jan; 32(1):91-5. PubMed ID: 21349612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evidence for teaching practice: the impact of clickers in a large classroom environment.
    Patterson B; Kilpatrick J; Woebkenberg E
    Nurse Educ Today; 2010 Oct; 30(7):603-7. PubMed ID: 20044180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. An audience response system may influence student performance on anatomy examination questions.
    Hoyt A; McNulty JA; Gruener G; Chandrasekhar A; Espiritu B; Ensminger D; Price R; Naheedy R
    Anat Sci Educ; 2010; 3(6):295-9. PubMed ID: 20890951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Livening up the classroom: using audience response systems to promote active learning.
    Collins LJ
    Med Ref Serv Q; 2007; 26(1):81-8. PubMed ID: 17210552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Using audience response technology for pretest reviews in an undergraduate nursing course.
    Stein PS; Challman SD; Brueckner JK
    J Nurs Educ; 2006 Nov; 45(11):469-73. PubMed ID: 17120866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Computer-aided vs. tutor-delivered teaching of exposure therapy for phobia/panic: randomized controlled trial with pre-registration nursing students.
    Gega L; Norman IJ; Marks IM
    Int J Nurs Stud; 2007 Mar; 44(3):397-405. PubMed ID: 16631177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Engaging millennial learners: Effectiveness of personal response system technology with nursing students in small and large classrooms.
    Revell SM; McCurry MK
    J Nurs Educ; 2010 May; 49(5):272-5. PubMed ID: 20055325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Epidemiology for community health nursing: an interactive computer assisted instruction program.
    Russell KM; Miller AM; Czerwinska J
    Comput Nurs; 1994; 12(2):98-105. PubMed ID: 8199930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Good experiences with an audience response system used in medical education.
    Jensen JV; Ostergaard D; Faxholt AK
    Dan Med Bull; 2011 Nov; 58(11):A4333. PubMed ID: 22047931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. EN to RN: the transition experience pre- and post-graduation.
    Rapley PA; Nathan P; Davidson L
    Rural Remote Health; 2006; 6(1):363. PubMed ID: 16526933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Experiences of faculty and students using an audience response system in the classroom.
    Thomas CM; Monturo C; Conroy K
    Comput Inform Nurs; 2011 Jul; 29(7):396-400. PubMed ID: 21107241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effectiveness, challenges, and perceptions of classroom participation systems.
    Smith DA; Rosenkoetter MM
    Nurse Educ; 2009; 34(4):156-61. PubMed ID: 19574851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. E-learning: is this teaching at students or teaching with students?
    Muirhead RJ
    Nurs Forum; 2007; 42(4):178-84. PubMed ID: 17944698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of Web-based instruction on learning behaviors of undergraduate and graduate students.
    Thiele JE; Allen C; Stucky M
    Nurs Health Care Perspect; 1999; 20(4):199-203. PubMed ID: 10624284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effect of differing Audience Response System question types on student attention in the veterinary medical classroom.
    Rush BR; Hafen M; Biller DS; Davis EG; Klimek JA; Kukanich B; Larson RL; Roush JK; Schermerhorn T; Wilkerson MJ; White BJ
    J Vet Med Educ; 2010; 37(2):145-53. PubMed ID: 20576903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effect of computer-assisted learning versus conventional teaching methods on the acquisition and retention of handwashing theory and skills in pre-qualification nursing students: a randomised controlled trial.
    Bloomfield J; Roberts J; While A
    Int J Nurs Stud; 2010 Mar; 47(3):287-94. PubMed ID: 19762016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A study of the effectiveness of an interactive computer classroom.
    Ayoub JL; Vanderboom C; Knight M; Walsh K; Briggs R; Grekin K
    Comput Nurs; 1998; 16(6):333-8. PubMed ID: 9844260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Nursing students' perception of a Web-based intervention to support learning.
    Koch J; Andrew S; Salamonson Y; Everett B; Davidson PM
    Nurse Educ Today; 2010 Aug; 30(6):584-90. PubMed ID: 20045583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Everyone's answering: using technology to increase classroom participation.
    Filer D
    Nurs Educ Perspect; 2010; 31(4):247-50. PubMed ID: 20882867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.