These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

101 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20510813)

  • 1. Breast cancer: should we investigate margins or redesign the surgical approach?
    Jensen JA
    J Am Coll Surg; 2010 Jun; 210(6):1012. PubMed ID: 20510813
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Lumpectomy and cavity shaving.
    Badruddoja M
    J Am Coll Surg; 2010 Jun; 210(6):1015-6. PubMed ID: 20510817
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Surgical and radiotherapeutic approaches according to postoperative margins analysis in breast cancer: survey realized in 20 French cancer centers].
    Hanzen C; de Lafontan B; Missohou F; Veyret C; Laberge S; Picquenot JM; Graïc Y
    Cancer Radiother; 2004 Aug; 8(4):217-21. PubMed ID: 15450514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Breast conservation surgery--the surgeon's factor.
    Woon YY; Chan MY
    Breast; 2005 Apr; 14(2):131-5. PubMed ID: 15767182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Breast surgeon's survey: no consensus for surgical treatment of pleomorphic lobular carcinoma in situ.
    Blair SL; Emerson DK; Kulkarni S; Hwang ES; Malcarne V; Ollila DW
    Breast J; 2013; 19(1):116-8. PubMed ID: 23231019
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Results of questionnaires concerning breast cancer surgery in Japan: an update in 2000.
    Breast Cancer; 2002; 9(1):1. PubMed ID: 12196713
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Surgical margins in lumpectomy for breast cancer--bigger is not better.
    Morrow M; Harris JR; Schnitt SJ
    N Engl J Med; 2012 Jul; 367(1):79-82. PubMed ID: 22762325
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Crossing the quality chasm in breast cancer care.
    Silliman RA
    J Clin Oncol; 2004 Sep; 22(18):3654-6. PubMed ID: 15289489
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Factors associated with surgical options for breast carcinoma.
    Chagpar AB; Studts JL; Scoggins CR; Martin RC; Carlson DJ; Laidley AL; El-Eid SE; McGlothin TQ; Noyes RD; McMasters KM
    Cancer; 2006 Apr; 106(7):1462-6. PubMed ID: 16470610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. On referral patterns for patients with breast cancer.
    Kahn KL
    J Clin Oncol; 2007 Jan; 25(3):244-6. PubMed ID: 17235041
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Conflicts in decision-making for breast cancer surgery.
    Opatt D; Morrow M; Hawley S; Schwartz K; Janz NK; Katz SJ
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2007 Sep; 14(9):2463-9. PubMed ID: 17510771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Patterns of care for younger women with breast cancer.
    Osteen RT; Cady B; Friedman M; Kraybill W; Doggett S; Hussey D; Urist M; Chmiel J; Clive R; Winchester D
    J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr; 1994; (16):43-6. PubMed ID: 7999468
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Physician practice volume and alternative surgical treatment for breast cancer in Florida.
    Luther SL; Studnicki J
    Health Serv Res; 2001 Dec; 36(6 Pt 2):166-79. PubMed ID: 16148967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The role of frozen section analysis of margins during breast conservation surgery.
    Weber S; Storm FK; Stitt J; Mahvi DM
    Cancer J Sci Am; 1997; 3(5):273-7. PubMed ID: 9327150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Minimizing local recurrence after breast conserving therapy using intraoperative shaved margins to determine pathologic tumor clearance.
    Camp ER; McAuliffe PF; Gilroy JS; Morris CG; Lind DS; Mendenhall NP; Copeland EM
    J Am Coll Surg; 2005 Dec; 201(6):855-61. PubMed ID: 16310688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Frozen section analysis for intraoperative margin assessment during breast-conserving surgery results in low rates of re-excision and local recurrence.
    Olson TP; Harter J; Muñoz A; Mahvi DM; Breslin T
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2007 Oct; 14(10):2953-60. PubMed ID: 17674109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Accuracy of intraoperative gross examination of surgical margin status in women undergoing partial mastectomy for breast malignancy.
    Balch GC; Mithani SK; Simpson JF; Kelley MC
    Am Surg; 2005 Jan; 71(1):22-7; discussion 27-8. PubMed ID: 15757052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Patterns of care study of breast-conserving therapy in Japan: comparison of the treatment process between 1995 1997 and 1999 2001 surveys.
    Yamauchi C; Mitsumori M; Sai H; Imagunbai T; Negoro Y; Sasaki Y; Hiraoka M; Shikama N; Sasaki S; Takegawa H; Inoue T; Teshima T
    Jpn J Clin Oncol; 2007 Oct; 37(10):737-43. PubMed ID: 17911378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The role of reexcision for positive margins in optimizing local disease control after breast-conserving surgery for cancer.
    Aziz D; Rawlinson E; Narod SA; Sun P; Lickley HL; McCready DR; Holloway CM
    Breast J; 2006; 12(4):331-7. PubMed ID: 16848842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Intra-operative touch preparation cytology; does it have a role in re-excision lumpectomy?
    Valdes EK; Boolbol SK; Cohen JM; Feldman SM
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2007 Mar; 14(3):1045-50. PubMed ID: 17206481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.