These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
5. Thirty-five millimeter versus digital photography: comparison of photographic quality and clinical evaluation. Wall S; Kazahaya K; Becker SS; Becker DG Facial Plast Surg; 1999; 15(2):101-9. PubMed ID: 11816120 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The importance of staff in the facial plastic surgical practice: dynamic staff interface with patients in support of the surgeon's objectives. Patseavouras LL Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am; 2008 May; 16(2):191-4, vi-vii. PubMed ID: 18355704 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Standardized photography in facial plastic surgery: pearls and pitfalls. Becker DG; Tardy ME Facial Plast Surg; 1999; 15(2):93-9. PubMed ID: 11816129 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The art of building a successful facial plastic surgery practice. McCollough EG Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am; 2008 May; 16(2):187-90, vi. PubMed ID: 18355703 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Digital photography for the light microscope: results with a gated, video-rate CCD camera and NIH-image software. Shaw SL; Salmon ED; Quatrano RS Biotechniques; 1995 Dec; 19(6):946-55. PubMed ID: 8747661 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Endoscopic photography: digital or 35 mm? Melder PC; Mair EA Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2003 May; 129(5):570-5. PubMed ID: 12759272 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Converting to digital photography: a model for a large group or academic practice. Galdino GM; Swier P; Manson PN; Vander Kolk CA Plast Reconstr Surg; 2000 Jul; 106(1):119-24. PubMed ID: 10883624 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Digital vs 35-mm photography. To convert or not to convert? Kokoska MS; Currens JW; Hollenbeak CS; Thomas JR; Stack BC Arch Facial Plast Surg; 1999; 1(4):276-81. PubMed ID: 10937115 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Intraoperative photography for dermatologic and plastic surgery. García-Rabasco A; Marín-Bertolín S; Esteve-Martínez A; García-Ruiz R Dermatol Surg; 2011 Mar; 37(3):404-6. PubMed ID: 21410825 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Cost considerations of converting to digital photography. Hollenbeak CS; Kokoska M; Stack BC Arch Facial Plast Surg; 2000; 2(2):122-3. PubMed ID: 10925437 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Low impedances: how important are they with digital recordings? Farley JW; Connolly JJ Am J Electroneurodiagnostic Technol; 2005 Jun; 45(2):139-44. PubMed ID: 15989076 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Cameras for digital microscopy. Spring KR Methods Cell Biol; 2007; 81():171-86. PubMed ID: 17519168 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Practical aspects of adjusting digital cameras. Nordberg JJ; Sluder G Methods Cell Biol; 2007; 81():159-69. PubMed ID: 17519167 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Managing patient dose in digital radiology. A report of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. International Commission on Radiological Protection Ann ICRP; 2004; 34(1):1-73. PubMed ID: 15302167 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Digital camera images obtained using a light-emitting diode illuminator and their dermatological applications. Ahn HH; Kim SN; Kye YC Skin Res Technol; 2006 Feb; 12(1):11-7. PubMed ID: 16420533 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]