These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

103 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20511081)

  • 1. Evaluating symmetry and facial motion using 3D videography.
    Salgado MD; Curtiss S; Tollefson TT
    Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am; 2010 May; 18(2):351-6, Table of Contents. PubMed ID: 20511081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Quantitative 3D soft tissue analysis of symmetry prior to and after unilateral cleft lip repair compared with non-cleft persons (performed in Cambodia).
    Schwenzer-Zimmerer K; Chaitidis D; Berg-Boerner I; Krol Z; Kovacs L; Schwenzer NF; Zimmerer S; Holberg C; Zeilhofer HF
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2008 Dec; 36(8):431-8. PubMed ID: 18701312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Three-dimensional analysis of facial symmetry in cleft lip and palate patients using optical surface data.
    Stauber I; Vairaktaris E; Holst A; Schuster M; Hirschfelder U; Neukam FW; Nkenke E
    J Orofac Orthop; 2008 Jul; 69(4):268-82. PubMed ID: 18797831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Nasolabial symmetry following Tennison-Randall lip repair: a three-dimensional approach in 10-year-old patients with unilateral clefts of lip, alveolus and palate.
    Bilwatsch S; Kramer M; Haeusler G; Schuster M; Wurm J; Vairaktaris E; Neukam FW; Nkenke E
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2006 Jul; 34(5):253-62. PubMed ID: 16777429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Facial motion analysis of acid burn victims--development of a new facial motion impairment index.
    Ghani S; Mannan A; Kaucer A; Sen SL; Clarke A; Butler P; Cartwright A
    Burns; 2007 Jun; 33(4):495-504. PubMed ID: 17374453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Three-dimensional facial morphology following surgical repair of unilateral cleft lip and palate in patients after nasoalveolar molding.
    Singh GD; Levy-Bercowski D; Yáñez MA; Santiago PE
    Orthod Craniofac Res; 2007 Aug; 10(3):161-6. PubMed ID: 17651132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Three-dimensional facial surface analysis of patients with skeletal malocclusion.
    Alves PV; Zhao L; Patel PK; Bolognese AM
    J Craniofac Surg; 2009 Mar; 20(2):290-6. PubMed ID: 19218859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Automatic three-dimensional quantitative analysis for evaluation of facial movement.
    Hontanilla B; Aubá C
    J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2008; 61(1):18-30. PubMed ID: 17569607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Computerized objective measurement of facial motion: normal variation and test-retest reliability.
    Neely JG; Wang KX; Shapland CA; Sehizadeh A; Wang A
    Otol Neurotol; 2010 Dec; 31(9):1488-92. PubMed ID: 20729781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Impact of facial asymmetry in visual perception: a 3-dimensional data analysis.
    Meyer-Marcotty P; Alpers GW; Gerdes AB; Stellzig-Eisenhauer A
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Feb; 137(2):168.e1-8; discussion 168-9. PubMed ID: 20152669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Objective facial photograph analysis using imaging software.
    Pham AM; Tollefson TT
    Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am; 2010 May; 18(2):341-9, Table of Contents. PubMed ID: 20511080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Reliability of a Method for Computing Facial Symmetry Plane and Degree of Asymmetry Based on 3D-data.
    Hartmann J; Meyer-Marcotty P; Benz M; Häusler G; Stellzig-Eisenhauer A
    J Orofac Orthop; 2007 Nov; 68(6):477-90. PubMed ID: 18034288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Videomimicography: a new objective evaluation of facial motor function].
    Wang DS; Dulguerov P; Lehmann W
    Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi; 2004 Jan; 39(1):44-7. PubMed ID: 15127569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A comparison of three-dimensional and two-dimensional analyses of facial motion.
    Gross MM; Trotman CA; Moffatt KS
    Angle Orthod; 1996; 66(3):189-94. PubMed ID: 8805913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Reproducibility of a method for analysis of morphological changes in perioral soft tissue in children using video cameras.
    Miyakawa T; Morinushi T; Yamasaki Y
    J Oral Rehabil; 2006 Mar; 33(3):202-8. PubMed ID: 16512886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Measurement of facial soft tissue mobility in man.
    Trotman CA; Stohler CS; Johnston LE
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 1998 Jan; 35(1):16-25. PubMed ID: 9482219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Three-dimensional motion analysis - an exploratory study. Part 1: assessment of facial movement.
    Popat H; Richmond S; Playle R; Marshall D; Rosin P; Cosker D
    Orthod Craniofac Res; 2008 Nov; 11(4):216-23. PubMed ID: 18950318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evolution of 3D surface imaging systems in facial plastic surgery.
    Tzou CH; Frey M
    Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am; 2011 Nov; 19(4):591-602, vii. PubMed ID: 22004854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Three dimensional analysis of facial movement in normal adults: influence of sex and facial shape.
    Weeden JC; Trotman CA; Faraway JJ
    Angle Orthod; 2001 Apr; 71(2):132-40. PubMed ID: 11302590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Objective measurement of normal facial movement with video microscaling.
    Wood DA; Hughes GB; Secic M; Good TL
    Am J Otol; 1994 Jan; 15(1):61-5. PubMed ID: 8109633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.