132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20511385)
1. Evaluation of a customized artificial osteoporotic bone model of the distal femur.
Wähnert D; Hoffmeier KL; Stolarczyk Y; Fröber R; Hofmann GO; Mückley T
J Biomater Appl; 2011 Nov; 26(4):451-64. PubMed ID: 20511385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Biomechanical characterization of an osteoporotic artificial bone model for the distal femur.
Wähnert D; Hoffmeier KL; Klos K; Stolarczyk Y; Fröber R; Hofmann GO; Mückley T
J Biomater Appl; 2012 Jan; 26(5):565-79. PubMed ID: 20819921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. An experimental study on the biomechanical properties of the cancellous bones of distal femur.
Du C; Ma H; Ruo M; Zhang Z; Yu X; Zeng Y
Biomed Mater Eng; 2006; 16(3):215-22. PubMed ID: 16518020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The biomechanics of human femurs in axial and torsional loading: comparison of finite element analysis, human cadaveric femurs, and synthetic femurs.
Papini M; Zdero R; Schemitsch EH; Zalzal P
J Biomech Eng; 2007 Feb; 129(1):12-9. PubMed ID: 17227093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effect of bone size, not density, on the stiffness of the proximal part of normal and osteoporotic human femora.
Cordey J; Schneider M; Belendez C; Ziegler WJ; Rahn BA; Perren SM
J Bone Miner Res; 1992 Dec; 7 Suppl 2():S437-44. PubMed ID: 1485554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A biomechanical study comparing a raft of 3.5 mm cortical screws with 6.5 mm cancellous screws in depressed tibial plateau fractures.
Patil S; Mahon A; Green S; McMurtry I; Port A
Knee; 2006 Jun; 13(3):231-5. PubMed ID: 16647262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Trabecular bone tissue strains in the healthy and osteoporotic human femur.
Van Rietbergen B; Huiskes R; Eckstein F; Rüegsegger P
J Bone Miner Res; 2003 Oct; 18(10):1781-8. PubMed ID: 14584888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Compressive properties of commercially available polyurethane foams as mechanical models for osteoporotic human cancellous bone.
Patel PS; Shepherd DE; Hukins DW
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2008 Oct; 9():137. PubMed ID: 18844988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Femoroplasty-augmentation of mechanical properties in the osteoporotic proximal femur: a biomechanical investigation of PMMA reinforcement in cadaver bones.
Heini PF; Franz T; Fankhauser C; Gasser B; Ganz R
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2004 Jun; 19(5):506-12. PubMed ID: 15182986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Factors affecting the stability of screws in human cortical osteoporotic bone: a cadaver study.
Thiele OC; Eckhardt C; Linke B; Schneider E; Lill CA
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2007 May; 89(5):701-5. PubMed ID: 17540760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Pullout strength and load to failure properties of self-tapping cortical screws in synthetic and cadaveric environments representative of healthy and osteoporotic bone.
Schoenfeld AJ; Battula S; Sahai V; Vrabec GA; Corman S; Burton L; Njus GO
J Trauma; 2008 May; 64(5):1302-7. PubMed ID: 18469654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Holding power of variable pitch screws in osteoporotic, osteopenic and normal bone: are all screws created equal?
Ramaswamy R; Evans S; Kosashvili Y
Injury; 2010 Feb; 41(2):179-83. PubMed ID: 19747678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Mechanical evaluation of a 4-mm cancellous "rescue" screw in osteoporotic cortical bone: a cadaveric study.
Wall SJ; Soin SP; Knight TA; Mears SC; Belkoff SM
J Orthop Trauma; 2010 Jun; 24(6):379-82. PubMed ID: 20502222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Femoroplasty--augmentation of the proximal femur with a composite bone cement--feasibility, biomechanical properties and osteosynthesis potential.
Beckmann J; Ferguson SJ; Gebauer M; Luering C; Gasser B; Heini P
Med Eng Phys; 2007 Sep; 29(7):755-64. PubMed ID: 17023189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Increased calcium content and inhomogeneity of mineralization render bone toughness in osteoporosis: mineralization, morphology and biomechanics of human single trabeculae.
Busse B; Hahn M; Soltau M; Zustin J; Püschel K; Duda GN; Amling M
Bone; 2009 Dec; 45(6):1034-43. PubMed ID: 19679206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Development of synthetic bone models for the evaluation of fracture fixation devices].
Uta S
Nihon Seikeigeka Gakkai Zasshi; 1992 Nov; 66(11):1156-64. PubMed ID: 1484235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Biomechanical study of pedicle screw fixation in severely osteoporotic bone.
Cook SD; Salkeld SL; Stanley T; Faciane A; Miller SD
Spine J; 2004; 4(4):402-8. PubMed ID: 15246300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The biomechanical analysis of simulating implants in function under osteoporotic jawbone by comparing cylindrical, apical tapered, neck tapered, and expandable type implants: a 3-dimensional finite element analysis.
Xiao JR; Li YF; Guan SM; Song L; Xu LX; Kong L
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 Jul; 69(7):e273-81. PubMed ID: 21367505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. New QCT analysis approach shows the importance of fall orientation on femoral neck strength.
Carpenter RD; Beaupré GS; Lang TF; Orwoll ES; Carter DR;
J Bone Miner Res; 2005 Sep; 20(9):1533-42. PubMed ID: 16059625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Cortical bone trajectory for lumbar pedicle screws.
Santoni BG; Hynes RA; McGilvray KC; Rodriguez-Canessa G; Lyons AS; Henson MA; Womack WJ; Puttlitz CM
Spine J; 2009 May; 9(5):366-73. PubMed ID: 18790684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
