These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20512573)
1. Sporting and physical activity following hip resurfacing. Fisher NE; Killampalli VV; Kundra RK; Jagodzinski NA; Mathur K; Reading AD Int Orthop; 2011 Jul; 35(7):977-80. PubMed ID: 20512573 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A medium-term comparison of hybrid hip replacement and Birmingham hip resurfacing in active young patients. Baker RP; Pollard TC; Eastaugh-Waring SJ; Bannister GC J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2011 Feb; 93(2):158-63. PubMed ID: 21282752 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A comparison of total hip resurfacing and total hip arthroplasty - patients and outcomes. Fowble VA; dela Rosa MA; Schmalzried TP Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis; 2009; 67(2):108-12. PubMed ID: 19583535 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Resurfacing and uncemented arthroplasty for young hip arthritis: functional outcomes at 5 years. Killampalli VV; Kundra RK; Chaudhry F; Chowdhry M; Fisher NE; Reading AD Hip Int; 2009; 19(3):234-8. PubMed ID: 19876877 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Are Females at Greater Risk for Revision Surgery After Hip Resurfacing Arthroplasty With the Articular Surface Replacement Prosthesis? Donahue GS; Lindgren V; Galea VP; Madanat R; Muratoglu O; Malchau H Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2016 Oct; 474(10):2257-65. PubMed ID: 27121872 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Short and mid-term outcomes and functional results in metal-on-metal hip resurfacing arthroplasty at 5 years follow-up: the Spanish experience. Pérez-Moro OS; Fernández-Cuadros ME; Neira-Borrajo I; Aranda-Izquierdo E; Albaladejo-Florin MJ; Llopis-Miró R BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2019 Apr; 20(1):172. PubMed ID: 30992064 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Outcomes after metal-on-metal hip resurfacing: could we achieve better function? Newman MA; Barker KL; Pandit H; Murray DW Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2008 Apr; 89(4):660-6. PubMed ID: 18373996 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Clinical and radiographic outcomes of the Birmingham Hip Resurfacing arthroplasty at a minimum follow-up of 10 years: results from an independent centre. Moroni A; Miscione MT; Orsini R; Micera G; Mosca S; Sinapi F; De Girolamo L; Banfi G Hip Int; 2017 Mar; 27(2):134-139. PubMed ID: 28362050 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Hip resurfacing in patients under thirty years old: an attractive option for young and active patients. Krantz N; Miletic B; Migaud H; Girard J Int Orthop; 2012 Sep; 36(9):1789-94. PubMed ID: 22576079 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Mid-Term Results and Predictors of Patient-Reported Outcomes of Birmingham Hip Resurfacing. Oak SR; Strnad GJ; O'Rourke C; Higuera CA; Spindler KP; Brooks PJ J Arthroplasty; 2017 Jan; 32(1):110-118. PubMed ID: 27480827 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Hip resurfacing arthroplasty: a series of 140 consecutive hips with a minimum five year follow-up. A clinical, radiological and histological analysis. Giannini S; Cadossi M; Chiarello E; Faldini C; Moroni A; Romagnoli M Hip Int; 2011; 21(1):52-8. PubMed ID: 21279970 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The relationship of sporting activity and implant survivorship after hip resurfacing. Le Duff MJ; Amstutz HC J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2012 May; 94(10):911-8. PubMed ID: 22617919 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Hip resurfacing versus total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review comparing standardized outcomes. Marshall DA; Pykerman K; Werle J; Lorenzetti D; Wasylak T; Noseworthy T; Dick DA; O'Connor G; Sundaram A; Heintzbergen S; Frank C Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2014 Jul; 472(7):2217-30. PubMed ID: 24700446 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The early results of metal-on-metal hip resurfacing - a prospective study at a minimum two-year follow-up. Bergeron SG; Desy NM; Nikolaou VS; Debiparshad K; Antoniou J Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis; 2009; 67(2):132-4. PubMed ID: 19583540 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Primary ceramic-on-ceramic total hip replacement versus metal-on-metal hip resurfacing in young active patients. Pattyn C; De Smet KA Orthopedics; 2008 Nov; 31(11):1078. PubMed ID: 19226097 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Treatment of the young active patient with osteoarthritis of the hip. A five- to seven-year comparison of hybrid total hip arthroplasty and metal-on-metal resurfacing. Pollard TC; Baker RP; Eastaugh-Waring SJ; Bannister GC J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2006 May; 88(5):592-600. PubMed ID: 16645103 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Survivorship and clinical outcome of Birmingham hip resurfacing: a minimum ten years' follow-up. Azam MQ; McMahon S; Hawdon G; Sankineani SR Int Orthop; 2016 Jan; 40(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 25820838 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Five to Ten-Year Results of the Birmingham Hip Resurfacing Implant in the U.S.: A Single Institution's Experience. Ford MC; Hellman MD; Kazarian GS; Clohisy JC; Nunley RM; Barrack RL J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2018 Nov; 100(21):1879-1887. PubMed ID: 30399083 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Ultrashort versus Conventional Anatomic Cementless Femoral Stems in the Same Patients Younger Than 55 Years. Kim YH; Park JW; Kim JS Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2016 Sep; 474(9):2008-17. PubMed ID: 27260482 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Surgical principles and clinical experiences with the DUROM hip resurfacing system using a lateral approach]. Gravius S; Mumme T; Weber O; Berdel P; Wirtz DC Oper Orthop Traumatol; 2009 Dec; 21(6):586-601. PubMed ID: 20087719 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]