These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20512708)

  • 1. Differences in carbohydrate profiles in batch culture grown planktonic and biofilm cells of Amphora rostrata Wm. Sm.
    Khodse VB; Bhosle NB
    Biofouling; 2010 Jul; 26(5):527-37. PubMed ID: 20512708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Persister cells, the biofilm matrix and tolerance to metal cations in biofilm and planktonic Pseudomonas aeruginosa.
    Harrison JJ; Turner RJ; Ceri H
    Environ Microbiol; 2005 Jul; 7(7):981-94. PubMed ID: 15946294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Polysaccharide differences between planktonic and biofilm-associated EPS from Pseudomonas fluorescens B52.
    Kives J; Orgaz B; Sanjosé C
    Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces; 2006 Oct; 52(2):123-7. PubMed ID: 16757156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Planktonic cell yield is linked to biofilm development.
    Bester E; Edwards EA; Wolfaardt GM
    Can J Microbiol; 2009 Oct; 55(10):1195-206. PubMed ID: 19935892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Role of exopolymeric substances of corrosion-aggressive bacteria in the biofilm formation on the steel surface].
    Purish LM; Asaulenko LH; Abdulina DR; Vasyl'ev VM; Iutyns'ka HO
    Mikrobiol Z; 2011; 73(1):3-9. PubMed ID: 21442946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. NMR metabolomics of planktonic and biofilm modes of growth in Pseudomonas aeruginosa.
    Gjersing EL; Herberg JL; Horn J; Schaldach CM; Maxwell RS
    Anal Chem; 2007 Nov; 79(21):8037-45. PubMed ID: 17915964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Flow cell hydrodynamics and their effects on E. coli biofilm formation under different nutrient conditions and turbulent flow.
    Teodósio JS; Simões M; Melo LF; Mergulhão FJ
    Biofouling; 2011 Jan; 27(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 21082456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Immunogenic potential of Enterococcus faecalis biofilm under simulated growth conditions.
    Mathew S; Yaw-Chyn L; Kishen A
    J Endod; 2010 May; 36(5):832-6. PubMed ID: 20416428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Differences in biofilm and planktonic cell mediated reduction of metalloid oxyanions.
    Harrison JJ; Ceri H; Stremick C; Turner RJ
    FEMS Microbiol Lett; 2004 Jun; 235(2):357-62. PubMed ID: 15183885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The characterization and comparison of exopolysaccharides from two benthic diatoms with different biofilm formation abilities.
    Jin C; Yu Z; Peng S; Feng KE; Zhang L; Zhou X
    An Acad Bras Cienc; 2018; 90(2):1503-1519. PubMed ID: 29898109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Characterization of Bordetella pertussis growing as biofilm by chemical analysis and FT-IR spectroscopy.
    Bosch A; Serra D; Prieto C; Schmitt J; Naumann D; Yantorno O
    Appl Microbiol Biotechnol; 2006 Aug; 71(5):736-47. PubMed ID: 16292646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Planktonic replication is essential for biofilm formation by Legionella pneumophila in a complex medium under static and dynamic flow conditions.
    Mampel J; Spirig T; Weber SS; Haagensen JA; Molin S; Hilbi H
    Appl Environ Microbiol; 2006 Apr; 72(4):2885-95. PubMed ID: 16597995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A comparative study of biofilm formation by Shiga toxigenic Escherichia coli using epifluorescence microscopy on stainless steel and a microtitre plate method.
    Rivas L; Dykes GA; Fegan N
    J Microbiol Methods; 2007 Apr; 69(1):44-51. PubMed ID: 17239460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Escherichia coli serotype O157:H7 retention on solid surfaces and peroxide resistance is enhanced by dual-strain biofilm formation.
    Uhlich GA; Rogers DP; Mosier DA
    Foodborne Pathog Dis; 2010 Aug; 7(8):935-43. PubMed ID: 20367070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Destruction of planktonic, adherent and biofilm cells of Staphylococcus epidermidis using a gliding discharge in humid air.
    Kamgang JO; Briandet R; Herry JM; Brisset JL; Naïtali M
    J Appl Microbiol; 2007 Sep; 103(3):621-8. PubMed ID: 17714395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Biofilm-specific surface properties and protein expression in oral Streptococcus sanguis.
    Black C; Allan I; Ford SK; Wilson M; McNab R
    Arch Oral Biol; 2004 Apr; 49(4):295-304. PubMed ID: 15003548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Biofilm diatom community structure: influence of temporal and substratum variability.
    Patil JS; Anil AC
    Biofouling; 2005; 21(3-4):189-206. PubMed ID: 16371339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Phage release from biofilm and planktonic Staphylococcus aureus cells.
    Resch A; Fehrenbacher B; Eisele K; Schaller M; Götz F
    FEMS Microbiol Lett; 2005 Nov; 252(1):89-96. PubMed ID: 16213676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of filamentation and mode of growth on antifungal susceptibility of Candida albicans.
    Watamoto T; Samaranayake LP; Jayatilake JA; Egusa H; Yatani H; Seneviratne CJ
    Int J Antimicrob Agents; 2009 Oct; 34(4):333-9. PubMed ID: 19376687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Antagonism between Bacillus cereus and Pseudomonas fluorescens in planktonic systems and in biofilms.
    Simões M; Simoes LC; Pereira MO; Vieira MJ
    Biofouling; 2008; 24(5):339-49. PubMed ID: 18576180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.