124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20512857)
1. Feasibility of in vivo measurement of carotid wall shear rate using spiral Fourier velocity encoded MRI.
Carvalho JL; Nielsen JF; Nayak KS
Magn Reson Med; 2010 Jun; 63(6):1537-47. PubMed ID: 20512857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Three-dimensional phase contrast velocity mapping acquisition improves wall shear stress estimation in vivo.
Wu SP; Ringgaard S; Pedersen EM
Magn Reson Imaging; 2004 Apr; 22(3):345-51. PubMed ID: 15062929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. MRI and CFD studies of pulsatile flow in healthy and stenosed carotid bifurcation models.
Marshall I; Zhao S; Papathanasopoulou P; Hoskins P; Xu Y
J Biomech; 2004 May; 37(5):679-87. PubMed ID: 15046997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Wall shear rates differ between the normal carotid, femoral, and brachial arteries: an in vivo MRI study.
Wu SP; Ringgaard S; Oyre S; Hansen MS; Rasmus S; Pedersen EM
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2004 Feb; 19(2):188-93. PubMed ID: 14745752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Optimization of 4D Flow MRI Spatial and Temporal Resolution for Examining Complex Hemodynamics in the Carotid Artery Bifurcation.
El Sayed R; Sharifi A; Park CC; Haussen DC; Allen JW; Oshinski JN
Cardiovasc Eng Technol; 2023 Jun; 14(3):476-488. PubMed ID: 37156900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Volumetric arterial wall shear stress calculation based on cine phase contrast MRI.
Potters WV; van Ooij P; Marquering H; vanBavel E; Nederveen AJ
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2015 Feb; 41(2):505-16. PubMed ID: 24436246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. MRI-based biomechanical parameters for carotid artery plaque vulnerability assessment.
Speelman L; Teng Z; Nederveen AJ; van der Lugt A; Gillard JH
Thromb Haemost; 2016 Mar; 115(3):493-500. PubMed ID: 26791734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Peak velocity measurements in tortuous arteries with phase contrast magnetic resonance imaging: the effect of multidirectional velocity encoding.
Schubert T; Bieri O; Pansini M; Stippich C; Santini F
Invest Radiol; 2014 Apr; 49(4):189-94. PubMed ID: 24300842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. MRI-determined carotid artery flow velocities and wall shear stress in a mouse model of vulnerable and stable atherosclerotic plaque.
van Bochove GS; Straathof R; Krams R; Nicolay K; Strijkers GJ
MAGMA; 2010 Apr; 23(2):77-84. PubMed ID: 20229088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. In vitro and preliminary in vivo validation of echo particle image velocimetry in carotid vascular imaging.
Zhang F; Lanning C; Mazzaro L; Barker AJ; Gates PE; Strain WD; Fulford J; Gosling OE; Shore AC; Bellenger NG; Rech B; Chen J; Chen J; Shandas R
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2011 Mar; 37(3):450-64. PubMed ID: 21316562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Distribution of wall shear rate throughout the arterial tree: a case study.
Stroev PV; Hoskins PR; Easson WJ
Atherosclerosis; 2007 Apr; 191(2):276-80. PubMed ID: 16828101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Wall shear stress calculations based on 3D cine phase contrast MRI and computational fluid dynamics: a comparison study in healthy carotid arteries.
Cibis M; Potters WV; Gijsen FJ; Marquering H; vanBavel E; van der Steen AF; Nederveen AJ; Wentzel JJ
NMR Biomed; 2014 Jul; 27(7):826-34. PubMed ID: 24817676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A comparison of estimation methods for computational fluid dynamics outflow boundary conditions using patient-specific carotid artery.
Lee CJ; Uemiya N; Ishihara S; Zhang Y; Qian Y
Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2013 Jun; 227(6):663-71. PubMed ID: 23636745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Wall shear stress estimated with phase contrast MRI in an in vitro and in vivo intracranial aneurysm.
van Ooij P; Potters WV; Guédon A; Schneiders JJ; Marquering HA; Majoie CB; vanBavel E; Nederveen AJ
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2013 Oct; 38(4):876-84. PubMed ID: 23417769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Wall shear stress--an important determinant of endothelial cell function and structure--in the arterial system in vivo. Discrepancies with theory.
Reneman RS; Arts T; Hoeks AP
J Vasc Res; 2006; 43(3):251-69. PubMed ID: 16491020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Assessment of the accuracy of MRI wall shear stress estimation using numerical simulations.
Petersson S; Dyverfeldt P; Ebbers T
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2012 Jul; 36(1):128-38. PubMed ID: 22336966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Flow-based method demonstrates improved accuracy for calculating wall shear stress in arterial flows from 4D flow MRI data.
Hurd ER; Iffrig E; Jiang D; Oshinski JN; Timmins LH
J Biomech; 2023 Jan; 146():111413. PubMed ID: 36535100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Profound increase in longitudinal displacements of the porcine carotid artery wall can take place independently of wall shear stress: a continuation report.
Ahlgren ÅR; Steen S; Segstedt S; Erlöv T; Lindström K; Sjöberg T; Persson HW; Ricci S; Tortoli P; Cinthio M
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2015 May; 41(5):1342-53. PubMed ID: 25726134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Spatial and spectral heterogeneity of time-varying shear stress profiles in the carotid bifurcation by phase-contrast MRI.
Gelfand BD; Epstein FH; Blackman BR
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2006 Dec; 24(6):1386-92. PubMed ID: 17083089
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Seven-tesla magnetic resonance imaging of atherosclerotic plaque in the significantly stenosed carotid artery: a feasibility study.
de Rotte AA; Koning W; Truijman MT; den Hartog AG; Bovens SM; Vink A; Sepehrkhouy S; Zwanenburg JJ; Klomp DW; Pasterkamp G; Moll FL; Luijten PR; Hendrikse J; de Borst GJ
Invest Radiol; 2014 Nov; 49(11):749-57. PubMed ID: 24918464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
