These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
296 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20513780)
41. Appraisal of guidelines for androgenetic alopecia using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation II instrument. Huang M; Zhou X J Eval Clin Pract; 2015 Dec; 21(6):1089-94. PubMed ID: 26507460 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Guidelines for the use of survivorship care plans: a systematic quality appraisal using the AGREE II instrument. Birken SA; Ellis SD; Walker JS; DiMartino LD; Check DK; Gerstel AA; Mayer DK Implement Sci; 2015 May; 10():63. PubMed ID: 25935752 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Improving the reliability of clinical practice guideline appraisals: effects of the Korean AGREE II scoring guide. Oh MK; Jo H; Lee YK J Korean Med Sci; 2014 Jun; 29(6):771-5. PubMed ID: 24932076 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Midwifery care: development of an instrument to measure quality based on the World Health Organization's classification of care in normal birth. Sandin Bojö AK; Hall-Lord ML; Axelsson O; Udén G; Wilde Larsson B J Clin Nurs; 2004 Jan; 13(1):75-83. PubMed ID: 14687296 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Evaluation of primary open-angle glaucoma clinical practice guidelines. Wu AM; Wu CM; Young BK; Wu DJ; Chen A; Margo CE; Greenberg PB Can J Ophthalmol; 2015 Jun; 50(3):192-6. PubMed ID: 26040218 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. E-learning interventions are comparable to user's manual in a randomized trial of training strategies for the AGREE II. Brouwers MC; Makarski J; Durocher LD; Levinson AJ Implement Sci; 2011 Jul; 6():81. PubMed ID: 21791080 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. [A brief introduction to Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation II]. Xie LM; Wang WY Zhong Xi Yi Jie He Xue Bao; 2012 Feb; 10(2):160-5. PubMed ID: 22313883 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Evaluation of the quality of guidelines for myasthenia gravis with the AGREE II instrument. Zhang Z; Guo J; Su G; Li J; Wu H; Xie X PLoS One; 2014; 9(11):e111796. PubMed ID: 25402504 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Appraising the quality of clinical practice guidelines in traditional Chinese medicine using AGREE II instrument: A systematic review. Yao L; Chen Y; Wang X; Shi X; Wang Y; Guo T; Yang K Int J Clin Pract; 2017 May; 71(5):. PubMed ID: 28382763 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Developing a Clinician Friendly Tool to Identify Useful Clinical Practice Guidelines: G-TRUST. Shaughnessy AF; Vaswani A; Andrews BK; Erlich DR; D'Amico F; Lexchin J; Cosgrove L Ann Fam Med; 2017 Sep; 15(5):413-418. PubMed ID: 28893810 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Findings from a novel approach to publication guideline revision: user road testing of a draft version of SQUIRE 2.0. Davies L; Donnelly KZ; Goodman DJ; Ogrinc G BMJ Qual Saf; 2016 Apr; 25(4):265-72. PubMed ID: 26263916 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Comparison of international guideline programs to evaluate and update the Dutch program for clinical guideline development in physical therapy. Van der Wees PJ; Hendriks EJ; Custers JW; Burgers JS; Dekker J; de Bie RA BMC Health Serv Res; 2007 Nov; 7():191. PubMed ID: 18036215 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Evaluation of the practice guidelines of Finnish Institute of Occupational Health with AGREE instrument. Kinnunen-Amoroso M; Pasternack I; Mattila S; Parantainen A Ind Health; 2009 Dec; 47(6):689-93. PubMed ID: 19996548 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Selecting a strategy for prevention of contrast-induced nephropathy in clinical practice: an evaluation of different clinical practice guidelines using the AGREE tool. Vanommeslaeghe F; De Mulder E; Van de Bruaene C; Van de Bruaene L; Lameire N; Van Biesen W Nephrol Dial Transplant; 2015 Aug; 30(8):1300-6. PubMed ID: 26047631 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Evidence-based guidelines in the evaluation of work disability: an international survey and a comparison of quality of development. de Boer WE; Bruinvels DJ; Rijkenberg AM; Donceel P; Anema JR BMC Public Health; 2009 Sep; 9():349. PubMed ID: 19765295 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Improving the user experience of patient versions of clinical guidelines: user testing of a Scottish Intercollegiate Guideline Network (SIGN) patient version. Fearns N; Graham K; Johnston G; Service D BMC Health Serv Res; 2016 Feb; 16():37. PubMed ID: 26837683 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Characteristics of high-quality guidelines: evaluation of 86 clinical guidelines developed in ten European countries and Canada. Burgers JS; Cluzeau FA; Hanna SE; Hunt C; Grol R Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2003; 19(1):148-57. PubMed ID: 12701947 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Assessing the process and outcome of the development of practice guidelines and recommendations: PANELVIEW instrument development. Wiercioch W; Akl EA; Santesso N; Zhang Y; Morgan RL; Yepes-Nuñez JJ; Kowalski S; Baldeh T; Mustafa RA; Laisaar KT; Raid U; Etxeandia-Ikobaltzeta I; Carrasco-Labra A; Ventresca M; Neumann I; Falavigna M; Brignardello-Petersen R; Morgano GP; Brożek J; McConnell M; Schünemann HJ; CMAJ; 2020 Oct; 192(40):E1138-E1145. PubMed ID: 33020121 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. [Systemic validation of clinical practice guidelines: the AGREE network]. Hannes K; Van Royen P; Aertgeerts B; Buntinx F; Ramaekers D; Chevalier P Rev Med Liege; 2005 Dec; 60(12):949-56. PubMed ID: 16457396 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Quality of reporting and evidence in American Academy of Pediatrics guidelines. Isaac A; Saginur M; Hartling L; Robinson JL Pediatrics; 2013 Apr; 131(4):732-8. PubMed ID: 23530180 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]