These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

105 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20514190)

  • 1. Parametric analysis of presession exposure to edible and nonedible stimuli.
    Sy JR; Borrero JC
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2009; 42(4):833-7. PubMed ID: 20514190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The generality of nicotine as a reinforcer enhancer in rats: effects on responding maintained by primary and conditioned reinforcers and resistance to extinction.
    Raiff BR; Dallery J
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 2008 Dec; 201(2):305-14. PubMed ID: 18695928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Using progressive ratio schedules to evaluate tokens as generalized conditioned reinforcers.
    Russell D; Ingvarsson ET; Haggar JL; Jessel J
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2018 Jan; 51(1):40-52. PubMed ID: 29193060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects of a motivating operation manipulation on the maintenance of mands.
    O'Reilly M; Aguilar J; Fragale C; Lang R; Edrisinha C; Sigafoos J; Lancioni G; Didden R
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2012; 45(2):443-7. PubMed ID: 22844154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Interactions between the effects of food and water motivating operations on food- and water-reinforced responding in mice.
    Lewon M; Spurlock ED; Peters CM; Hayes LJ
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2019 May; 111(3):493-507. PubMed ID: 31038215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Resistance to change and frequency of response-dependent stimuli uncorrelated with reinforcement.
    Podlesnik CA; Jimenez-Gomez C; Ward RD; Shahan TA
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2009 Sep; 92(2):199-214. PubMed ID: 20354599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Escalation of food-maintained responding and sensitivity to the locomotor stimulant effects of cocaine in mice.
    Goeders JE; Murnane KS; Banks ML; Fantegrossi WE
    Pharmacol Biochem Behav; 2009 Jul; 93(1):67-74. PubMed ID: 19376153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparing the reinforcing efficacy of tokens and primary reinforcers.
    Bonfonte SA; Bourret JC; Lloveras LA
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2020 Jul; 53(3):1593-1605. PubMed ID: 31930500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Stimulus dynamics increase the self-administration of compound visual and auditory stimuli.
    Olsen CM; Winder DG
    Neurosci Lett; 2012 Mar; 511(1):8-11. PubMed ID: 22249116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Motivational influences on performance maintained by food reinforcement.
    North ST; Iwata BA
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2005; 38(3):317-33. PubMed ID: 16270842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effects of reinforcer consumption and magnitude on response rates during noncontingent reinforcement.
    Roscoe EM; Iwata BA; Rand MS
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2003; 36(4):525-39. PubMed ID: 14768670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. An examination of within-session responding following access to reinforcing stimuli.
    Rispoli M; O'Reilly M; Lang R; Machalicek W; Kang S; Davis T; Neely L
    Res Dev Disabil; 2016 Jan; 48():25-34. PubMed ID: 26524727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Delayed reinforcement of operant behavior.
    Lattal KA
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2010 Jan; 93(1):129-39. PubMed ID: 20676272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A review of positive conditioned reinforcement.
    KELLEHER RT; GOLLUB LR
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1962 Oct; 5(4 Suppl):543-97. PubMed ID: 14031747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Parametric analysis of delayed primary and conditioned reinforcers.
    Leon Y; Borrero JC; DeLeon IG
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2016 Sep; 49(3):639-55. PubMed ID: 27174440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A systematic examination of different parameters of presession exposure to tangible stimuli that maintain problem behavior.
    O'Reilly M; Lang R; Davis T; Rispoli M; Machalicek W; Sigafoos J; Lancioni G; Didden R
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2009; 42(4):773-83. PubMed ID: 22102760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of reinforcer limitations on fixed-ratio responding during repeated administration of chlorpromazine.
    Smith JB
    Pharmacol Biochem Behav; 1993 Jul; 45(3):565-9. PubMed ID: 8332617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Withdrawal of presession saccharin suppresses food-maintained responding in rats.
    Rudski J; Gurmankin C
    Percept Mot Skills; 1998 Apr; 86(2):355-61. PubMed ID: 9638732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Experience with dynamic reinforcement rates decreases resistance to extinction.
    Craig AR; Shahan TA
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2016 Mar; 105(2):291-306. PubMed ID: 26813330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Examining stimuli paired with alternative reinforcement to mitigate resurgence in children diagnosed with autism spectrum disorder and pigeons.
    Shvarts S; Jimenez-Gomez C; Bai JYH; Thomas RR; Oskam JJ; Podlesnik CA
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2020 Jan; 113(1):214-231. PubMed ID: 31856325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.