These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20514452)

  • 1. Genomic change of chromosome 8 predicts the response to taxane-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy in node-positive breast cancer.
    Han S; Park K; Shin E; Kim HJ; Kim JY; Kim JY; Gwak G
    Oncol Rep; 2010 Jul; 24(1):121-8. PubMed ID: 20514452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Relationship of clinical and pathologic response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy and outcome of locally advanced breast cancer.
    Gajdos C; Tartter PI; Estabrook A; Gistrak MA; Jaffer S; Bleiweiss IJ
    J Surg Oncol; 2002 May; 80(1):4-11. PubMed ID: 11967899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Genomic alterations in primary breast cancers compared with their sentinel and more distal lymph node metastases: an aCGH study.
    Wang C; Iakovlev VV; Wong V; Leung S; Warren K; Iakovleva G; Arneson NC; Pintilie M; Miller N; Youngson B; McCready DR; Done SJ
    Genes Chromosomes Cancer; 2009 Dec; 48(12):1091-101. PubMed ID: 19760610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. High-resolution genomic profiling to predict 10-year overall survival in node-negative breast cancer.
    Möllerström E; Delle U; Danielsson A; Parris T; Olsson B; Karlsson P; Helou K
    Cancer Genet Cytogenet; 2010 Apr; 198(2):79-89. PubMed ID: 20362222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. High-resolution genomic profiling reveals association of chromosomal aberrations on 1q and 16p with histologic and genetic subgroups of invasive breast cancer.
    Stange DE; Radlwimmer B; Schubert F; Traub F; Pich A; Toedt G; Mendrzyk F; Lehmann U; Eils R; Kreipe H; Lichter P
    Clin Cancer Res; 2006 Jan; 12(2):345-52. PubMed ID: 16428471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Prognostic value of persistent node involvement after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with operable breast cancer.
    Pierga JY; Mouret E; Diéras V; Laurence V; Beuzeboc P; Dorval T; Palangié T; Jouve M; Vincent-Salomon A; Scholl S; Extra JM; Asselain B; Pouillart P
    Br J Cancer; 2000 Dec; 83(11):1480-7. PubMed ID: 11076657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Genomic aberrations in squamous cell lung carcinoma related to lymph node or distant metastasis.
    Boelens MC; Kok K; van der Vlies P; van der Vries G; Sietsma H; Timens W; Postma DS; Groen HJ; van den Berg A
    Lung Cancer; 2009 Dec; 66(3):372-8. PubMed ID: 19324446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Analysis of chromosomal aberrations in breast cancer by comparative genomic hybridization (CGH). Correlation with histoprognostic variables and c-erbB-2 immunoexpression.
    Malamou-Mitsi VD; Syrrou M; Georgiou I; Pagoulatos G; Agnantis NJ
    J Exp Clin Cancer Res; 1999 Sep; 18(3):357-61. PubMed ID: 10606182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Gene expression profiles of breast cancer obtained from core cut biopsies before neoadjuvant docetaxel, adriamycin, and cyclophoshamide chemotherapy correlate with routine prognostic markers and could be used to identify predictive signatures.
    Rody A; Karn T; Gätje R; Kourtis K; Minckwitz G; Loibl S; Munnes M; Ruckhäberle E; Holtrich U; Kaufmann M; Ahr A
    Zentralbl Gynakol; 2006 Apr; 128(2):76-81. PubMed ID: 16673249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. DNA sequence losses on chromosomes 11p and 18q are associated with clinical outcome in lymph node-negative ductal breast cancer.
    Dellas A; Torhorst J; Schultheiss E; Mihatsch MJ; Moch H
    Clin Cancer Res; 2002 May; 8(5):1210-6. PubMed ID: 12006540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Determining the morphological features of breast cancer and predicting the effects of neoadjuvant chemotherapy via diagnostic breast imaging.
    Tsunoda-Shimizu H; Hayashi N; Hamaoka T; Kawasaki T; Tsugawa K; Yagata H; Kikuchi M; Suzuki K; Nakamura S
    Breast Cancer; 2008; 15(2):133-40. PubMed ID: 18288570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Genomic alterations of chromosome region 11p as predictive marker by array comparative genomic hybridization in lung adenocarcinoma patients.
    Sung JS; Park KH; Kim YH
    Cancer Genet Cytogenet; 2010 Apr; 198(1):27-34. PubMed ID: 20303011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Global search for chromosomal abnormalities in infiltrating ductal carcinoma of the breast using array-comparative genomic hybridization.
    Somiari SB; Shriver CD; He J; Parikh K; Jordan R; Hooke J; Hu H; Deyarmin B; Lubert S; Malicki L; Heckman C; Somiari RI
    Cancer Genet Cytogenet; 2004 Dec; 155(2):108-18. PubMed ID: 15571796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. BAC clones related to prognosis in patients with esophageal squamous carcinoma: an array comparative genomic hybridization study.
    Hirasaki S; Noguchi T; Mimori K; Onuki J; Morita K; Inoue H; Sugihara K; Mori M; Hirano T
    Oncologist; 2007 Apr; 12(4):406-17. PubMed ID: 17470683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A prognostic DNA signature for T1T2 node-negative breast cancer patients.
    Gravier E; Pierron G; Vincent-Salomon A; Gruel N; Raynal V; Savignoni A; De Rycke Y; Pierga JY; Lucchesi C; Reyal F; Fourquet A; Roman-Roman S; Radvanyi F; Sastre-Garau X; Asselain B; Delattre O
    Genes Chromosomes Cancer; 2010 Dec; 49(12):1125-34. PubMed ID: 20842727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A copy number gain of the 6p arm is linked with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: an array-based comparative genomic hybridization study.
    Chochi Y; Kawauchi S; Nakao M; Furuya T; Hashimoto K; Oga A; Oka M; Sasaki K
    J Pathol; 2009 Apr; 217(5):677-84. PubMed ID: 19097070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. High-resolution array comparative genomic hybridization of chromosome arm 8q: evaluation of genetic progression markers for prostate cancer.
    van Duin M; van Marion R; Vissers K; Watson JE; van Weerden WM; Schröder FH; Hop WC; van der Kwast TH; Collins C; van Dekken H
    Genes Chromosomes Cancer; 2005 Dec; 44(4):438-49. PubMed ID: 16130124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Genome-wide profiling of oral squamous cell carcinoma by array-based comparative genomic hybridization.
    Sparano A; Quesnelle KM; Kumar MS; Wang Y; Sylvester AJ; Feldman M; Sewell DA; Weinstein GS; Brose MS
    Laryngoscope; 2006 May; 116(5):735-41. PubMed ID: 16652080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of HER-2 status determined by fluorescence in situ hybridization in primary and metastatic breast carcinoma.
    Gong Y; Booser DJ; Sneige N
    Cancer; 2005 May; 103(9):1763-9. PubMed ID: 15786420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Differences in genetic alterations between primary lobular and ductal breast cancers detected by comparative genomic hybridization.
    Günther K; Merkelbach-Bruse S; Amo-Takyi BK; Handt S; Schröder W; Tietze L
    J Pathol; 2001 Jan; 193(1):40-7. PubMed ID: 11169514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.