176 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20514826)
1. Imaging the vulnerable carotid artery plaque.
Hermus L; Tielliu IF; Wallis de Vries BM; van den Dungen JJ; Zeebregts CJ
Acta Chir Belg; 2010; 110(2):159-64. PubMed ID: 20514826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Contemporary carotid imaging: from degree of stenosis to plaque vulnerability.
Brinjikji W; Huston J; Rabinstein AA; Kim GM; Lerman A; Lanzino G
J Neurosurg; 2016 Jan; 124(1):27-42. PubMed ID: 26230478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. What are current preprocedure imaging requirements for carotid artery stenting and carotid endarterectomy: have magnetic resonance angiography and computed tomographic angiography made a difference?
Maldonado TS
Semin Vasc Surg; 2007 Dec; 20(4):205-15. PubMed ID: 18082837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Plaque At RISK (PARISK): prospective multicenter study to improve diagnosis of high-risk carotid plaques.
Truijman MT; Kooi ME; van Dijk AC; de Rotte AA; van der Kolk AG; Liem MI; Schreuder FH; Boersma E; Mess WH; van Oostenbrugge RJ; Koudstaal PJ; Kappelle LJ; Nederkoorn PJ; Nederveen AJ; Hendrikse J; van der Steen AF; Daemen MJ; van der Lugt A
Int J Stroke; 2014 Aug; 9(6):747-54. PubMed ID: 24138596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Diagnostic imaging of carotid stenosis: ultrasound, magnetic resonance imaging, and computed tomography angiography].
Nemoto S
Nihon Geka Gakkai Zasshi; 2011 Nov; 112(6):371-6. PubMed ID: 22165710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Advanced carotid plaque imaging.
Hermus L; van Dam GM; Zeebregts CJ
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg; 2010 Feb; 39(2):125-33. PubMed ID: 20031452
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluating the carotid plaque: going beyond stenosis.
Chalela JA
Cerebrovasc Dis; 2009; 27 Suppl 1():19-24. PubMed ID: 19342830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Plaque morphology (the PLAC Scale) on CT angiography: predicting long-term anatomical success of primary carotid stenting.
Pelz DM; Lownie SP; Lee DH; Boulton MR
J Neurosurg; 2015 Oct; 123(4):856-61. PubMed ID: 25816084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Clinical usefulness of and problems with three-dimensional CT angiography for the evaluation of arteriosclerotic stenosis of the carotid artery: comparison with conventional angiography, MRA, and ultrasound sonography.
Sameshima T; Futami S; Morita Y; Yokogami K; Miyahara S; Sameshima Y; Goya T; Wakisaka S
Surg Neurol; 1999 Mar; 51(3):301-8; discussion 308-9. PubMed ID: 10086495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. National variation in preoperative imaging, carotid duplex ultrasound criteria, and threshold for surgery for asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis.
Arous EJ; Simons JP; Flahive JM; Beck AW; Stone DH; Hoel AW; Messina LM; Schanzer A;
J Vasc Surg; 2015 Oct; 62(4):937-44. PubMed ID: 26067201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Plaque Characteristics of Patients with Symptomatic Mild Carotid Artery Stenosis.
Takai H; Uemura J; Yagita Y; Ogawa Y; Kinoshita K; Hirai S; Ishihara M; Hara K; Toi H; Matsubara S; Nishimura H; Uno M
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis; 2018 Jul; 27(7):1930-1936. PubMed ID: 29571763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Computed tomography angiography validates duplex sonographic evaluation of carotid artery stenosis.
Cinat ME; Casalme C; Wilson SE; Pham H; Anderson P
Am Surg; 2003 Oct; 69(10):842-7. PubMed ID: 14570360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The vulnerable carotid artery plaque: current imaging methods and new perspectives.
Nighoghossian N; Derex L; Douek P
Stroke; 2005 Dec; 36(12):2764-72. PubMed ID: 16282537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Combined use of duplex imaging and magnetic resonance angiography for evaluation of patients with symptomatic ipsilateral high-grade carotid stenosis.
Turnipseed WD; Kennell TW; Turski PA; Acher CW; Hoch JR
J Vasc Surg; 1993 May; 17(5):832-9; discussion 839-40. PubMed ID: 8487351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Early detection of asymptomatic carotid disease in patients with obliterative arteriosclerosis of the lower extremities].
Rancić Z; Radak D; Stojanović D
Srp Arh Celok Lek; 2002; 130(7-8):258-64. PubMed ID: 12585003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Utility of 3-dimensional ultrasound imaging to evaluate carotid artery stenosis: comparison with magnetic resonance angiography.
Igase K; Kumon Y; Matsubara I; Arai M; Goishi J; Watanabe H; Ohnishi T; Sadamoto K
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis; 2015 Jan; 24(1):148-53. PubMed ID: 25440325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Carotid angioplasty and stenting is safe and effective for treatment of recurrent stenosis after eversion endarterectomy.
Radak D; Tanaskovic S; Sagic D; Antonic Z; Babic S; Popov P; Matic P; Rancic Z
J Vasc Surg; 2014 Sep; 60(3):645-51. PubMed ID: 24794275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Carotid endarterectomy in the acute phase of crescendo cerebral transient ischemic attacks is safe and effective.
Leseche G; Alsac JM; Castier Y; Fady F; Lavallee PC; Mazighi M; Amarenco P
J Vasc Surg; 2011 Mar; 53(3):637-42. PubMed ID: 21129902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Carotid stenosis: diagnosis, patient selection, therapy].
Barth A
Ther Umsch; 2003 Sep; 60(9):563-8. PubMed ID: 14579625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Quantitative assessment of carotid stenosis: comparison between Doppler ultrasound, spiral computed tomography angiography, magnetic resonance angiography and digital angiography].
Tiev KP; Sevestre MA; Reix T; Auquier M; Cabane J; Dehouck B; Jounaville F; Idy Perretti I; Sentou Y; Remond A; Pietri J
J Mal Vasc; 2000 Dec; 25(5):325-331. PubMed ID: 11148393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
