These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

177 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20514965)

  • 1. The financial and environmental costs of reusable and single-use plastic anaesthetic drug trays.
    McGain F; McAlister S; McGavin A; Story D
    Anaesth Intensive Care; 2010 May; 38(3):538-44. PubMed ID: 20514965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A life cycle assessment of reusable and single-use central venous catheter insertion kits.
    McGain F; McAlister S; McGavin A; Story D
    Anesth Analg; 2012 May; 114(5):1073-80. PubMed ID: 22492185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Financial and environmental costs of reusable and single-use anaesthetic equipment.
    McGain F; Story D; Lim T; McAlister S
    Br J Anaesth; 2017 Jun; 118(6):862-869. PubMed ID: 28505289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Life Cycle Assessment and Costing Methods for Device Procurement: Comparing Reusable and Single-Use Disposable Laryngoscopes.
    Sherman JD; Raibley LA; Eckelman MJ
    Anesth Analg; 2018 Aug; 127(2):434-443. PubMed ID: 29324492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Carbon Footprint in Flexible Ureteroscopy: A Comparative Study on the Environmental Impact of Reusable and Single-Use Ureteroscopes.
    Davis NF; McGrath S; Quinlan M; Jack G; Lawrentschuk N; Bolton DM
    J Endourol; 2018 Mar; 32(3):214-217. PubMed ID: 29373918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparative life cycle assessment of disposable and reusable laryngeal mask airways.
    Eckelman M; Mosher M; Gonzalez A; Sherman J
    Anesth Analg; 2012 May; 114(5):1067-72. PubMed ID: 22492190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of economic and environmental impacts between disposable and reusable instruments used for laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
    Adler S; Scherrer M; Rückauer KD; Daschner FD
    Surg Endosc; 2005 Feb; 19(2):268-72. PubMed ID: 15580444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. SSET Project: Cost-effectiveness Analysis of Surgical Specialty Emergency Trays in the Emergency Department.
    Humphries LS; Shenaq DS; Teven CM; Park JE; Song DH
    Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open; 2018 Jan; 6(1):e1591. PubMed ID: 29464153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Data analysis of vascular surgery instrument trays yielded large cost and efficiency savings.
    Knowles M; Gay SS; Konchan SK; Mendes R; Rath S; Deshpande V; Farber MA; Wood BC
    J Vasc Surg; 2021 Jun; 73(6):2144-2153. PubMed ID: 33359847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Disposable versus reusable biopsy forceps in GI endoscopy: a cost-minimization analysis.
    Bourguignon C; Destrumelle AS; Koch S; Grumblat A; Carayon P; Chopard C; Woronoff-Lemsi MC
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2003 Aug; 58(2):226-9. PubMed ID: 12872090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of the Costs of Reusable Versus Disposable Equipment for Endoscopic Carpal Tunnel Release Procedures Using Activity-Based Costing Analysis.
    Voigt J; Seigerman D; Lutsky K; Beredjiklian P; Leinberry C
    J Hand Surg Am; 2021 Apr; 46(4):339.e1-339.e15. PubMed ID: 33191039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cost comparison of reusable and disposable air/water syringe tips in a large French teaching hospital.
    Silva ML; Zumpe M; Lespinasse J; Aulois-Griot M
    Swiss Dent J; 2018 Jan; 128(1):20-29. PubMed ID: 30920783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Reducing cost and improving operating room efficiency: examination of surgical instrument processing.
    Dyas AR; Lovell KM; Balentine CJ; Wang TN; Porterfield JR; Chen H; Lindeman BM
    J Surg Res; 2018 Sep; 229():15-19. PubMed ID: 29936982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Single-use disposable digital flexible ureteroscopes: an ex vivo assessment and cost analysis.
    Hennessey DB; Fojecki GL; Papa NP; Lawrentschuk N; Bolton D
    BJU Int; 2018 May; 121 Suppl 3():55-61. PubMed ID: 29656467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Systematic review of reusable versus disposable laparoscopic instruments: costs and safety.
    Siu J; Hill AG; MacCormick AD
    ANZ J Surg; 2017 Jan; 87(1-2):28-33. PubMed ID: 27878921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Surgical tray optimization as a simple means to decrease perioperative costs.
    Farrelly JS; Clemons C; Witkins S; Hall W; Christison-Lagay ER; Ozgediz DE; Cowles RA; Stitelman DH; Caty MG
    J Surg Res; 2017 Dec; 220():320-326. PubMed ID: 29180198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Surgical Tray Optimization and Efficiency: The Impact of a Novel Sealed Sterile Container and Instrument Tray Technology.
    Marchand KB; Taylor KB; Salem HS; Mont MA; Marchand RC
    Surg Technol Int; 2020 Nov; 37():349-355. PubMed ID: 33245139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Life-cycle assessment of single-use versus reusable surgical drapes (cellulose/polyethylene-mixed cotton system)].
    Dettenkofer M; Griesshammer R; Scherrer M; Daschner F
    Chirurg; 1999 Apr; 70(4):485-91; discussion 491-2. PubMed ID: 10354851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Environmental impact of single-use, reusable, and mixed trocar systems used for laparoscopic cholecystectomies.
    Boberg L; Singh J; Montgomery A; Bentzer P
    PLoS One; 2022; 17(7):e0271601. PubMed ID: 35839237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [A comparative cost analysis of single-use versus reusable fiberoptic bronchoscopes: Is single-use fiberscope worth it?].
    Videau M; Rghioui K; Mottet B; Sainfort A; Lefort I
    Ann Pharm Fr; 2017 Nov; 75(6):473-479. PubMed ID: 28818319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.