These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
177 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20514965)
1. The financial and environmental costs of reusable and single-use plastic anaesthetic drug trays. McGain F; McAlister S; McGavin A; Story D Anaesth Intensive Care; 2010 May; 38(3):538-44. PubMed ID: 20514965 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A life cycle assessment of reusable and single-use central venous catheter insertion kits. McGain F; McAlister S; McGavin A; Story D Anesth Analg; 2012 May; 114(5):1073-80. PubMed ID: 22492185 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Financial and environmental costs of reusable and single-use anaesthetic equipment. McGain F; Story D; Lim T; McAlister S Br J Anaesth; 2017 Jun; 118(6):862-869. PubMed ID: 28505289 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Life Cycle Assessment and Costing Methods for Device Procurement: Comparing Reusable and Single-Use Disposable Laryngoscopes. Sherman JD; Raibley LA; Eckelman MJ Anesth Analg; 2018 Aug; 127(2):434-443. PubMed ID: 29324492 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Carbon Footprint in Flexible Ureteroscopy: A Comparative Study on the Environmental Impact of Reusable and Single-Use Ureteroscopes. Davis NF; McGrath S; Quinlan M; Jack G; Lawrentschuk N; Bolton DM J Endourol; 2018 Mar; 32(3):214-217. PubMed ID: 29373918 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparative life cycle assessment of disposable and reusable laryngeal mask airways. Eckelman M; Mosher M; Gonzalez A; Sherman J Anesth Analg; 2012 May; 114(5):1067-72. PubMed ID: 22492190 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of economic and environmental impacts between disposable and reusable instruments used for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Adler S; Scherrer M; Rückauer KD; Daschner FD Surg Endosc; 2005 Feb; 19(2):268-72. PubMed ID: 15580444 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. SSET Project: Cost-effectiveness Analysis of Surgical Specialty Emergency Trays in the Emergency Department. Humphries LS; Shenaq DS; Teven CM; Park JE; Song DH Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open; 2018 Jan; 6(1):e1591. PubMed ID: 29464153 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Data analysis of vascular surgery instrument trays yielded large cost and efficiency savings. Knowles M; Gay SS; Konchan SK; Mendes R; Rath S; Deshpande V; Farber MA; Wood BC J Vasc Surg; 2021 Jun; 73(6):2144-2153. PubMed ID: 33359847 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Disposable versus reusable biopsy forceps in GI endoscopy: a cost-minimization analysis. Bourguignon C; Destrumelle AS; Koch S; Grumblat A; Carayon P; Chopard C; Woronoff-Lemsi MC Gastrointest Endosc; 2003 Aug; 58(2):226-9. PubMed ID: 12872090 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of the Costs of Reusable Versus Disposable Equipment for Endoscopic Carpal Tunnel Release Procedures Using Activity-Based Costing Analysis. Voigt J; Seigerman D; Lutsky K; Beredjiklian P; Leinberry C J Hand Surg Am; 2021 Apr; 46(4):339.e1-339.e15. PubMed ID: 33191039 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Cost comparison of reusable and disposable air/water syringe tips in a large French teaching hospital. Silva ML; Zumpe M; Lespinasse J; Aulois-Griot M Swiss Dent J; 2018 Jan; 128(1):20-29. PubMed ID: 30920783 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]