These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
217 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20515190)
1. Timing is affected by demands in memory search but not by task switching. Fortin C; Schweickert R; Gaudreault R; Viau-Quesnel C J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Jun; 36(3):580-95. PubMed ID: 20515190 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Bidirectional interference between timing and concurrent memory processing in children. Rattat AC J Exp Child Psychol; 2010; 106(2-3):145-62. PubMed ID: 20211473 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Working memory costs of task switching. Liefooghe B; Barrouillet P; Vandierendonck A; Camos V J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 May; 34(3):478-94. PubMed ID: 18444750 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Temporal order in memory and interval timing: an interference analysis. Fortin C; Champagne J; Poirier M Acta Psychol (Amst); 2007 Sep; 126(1):18-33. PubMed ID: 17123455 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Bivalent task switching and memory load: Similar costs on reaction times, different costs on concurrent timing. Viau-Quesnel C; Fortin C Can J Exp Psychol; 2014 Sep; 68(3):194-203. PubMed ID: 25383477 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The role of executive functions in human prospective interval timing. Ogden RS; Salominaite E; Jones LA; Fisk JE; Montgomery C Acta Psychol (Amst); 2011 Jul; 137(3):352-8. PubMed ID: 21561595 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Regular physical activity improves executive function during task switching in young adults. Kamijo K; Takeda Y Int J Psychophysiol; 2010 Mar; 75(3):304-11. PubMed ID: 20079771 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Age differences and similarities in the improvement of controlled search. Madden DJ Exp Aging Res; 1982; 8(2):91-8. PubMed ID: 7128659 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Working memory capacity and the top-down control of visual search: Exploring the boundaries of "executive attention". Kane MJ; Poole BJ; Tuholski SW; Engle RW J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Jul; 32(4):749-77. PubMed ID: 16822145 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Visual search does not remain efficient when executive working memory is working. Han SH; Kim MS Psychol Sci; 2004 Sep; 15(9):623-8. PubMed ID: 15327634 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Modulating the interference effect in timing with varying stimulus onset asynchrony. Rattat AC; Fortin C Can J Exp Psychol; 2011 Sep; 65(3):151-62. PubMed ID: 21639613 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Task switching in video game players: Benefits of selective attention but not resistance to proactive interference. Karle JW; Watter S; Shedden JM Acta Psychol (Amst); 2010 May; 134(1):70-8. PubMed ID: 20064634 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effect of template complexity on visual search and dual-task performance. Bourke PA; Duncan J Psychol Sci; 2005 Mar; 16(3):208-13. PubMed ID: 15733201 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Executive working memory load does not compromise perceptual processing during visual search: evidence from additive factors analysis. He J; McCarley JS Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Feb; 72(2):308-16. PubMed ID: 20139447 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Erroneous knowledge of results affects decision and memory processes on timing tasks. Ryan LJ; Fritz MS J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2007 Dec; 33(6):1468-82. PubMed ID: 18085957 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]