These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
218 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20515238)
1. A model-averaging approach to replication: the case of p rep. Iverson GJ; Wagenmakers EJ; Lee MD Psychol Methods; 2010 Jun; 15(2):172-81. PubMed ID: 20515238 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Killeen's (2005) p rep coefficient: logical and mathematical problems. Maraun M; Gabriel S Psychol Methods; 2010 Jun; 15(2):182-91. PubMed ID: 20515239 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. How often is prep close to the true replication probability? Trafimow D; MacDonald JA; Rice S; Clason DL Psychol Methods; 2010 Sep; 15(3):300-7. PubMed ID: 20822254 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Killeen's probability of replication and predictive probabilities: how to compute, use, and interpret them. Lecoutre B; Lecoutre MP; Poitevineau J Psychol Methods; 2010 Jun; 15(2):158-71. PubMed ID: 20515237 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Replication, p rep, and confidence intervals: comment prompted by Iverson, Wagenmakers, and Lee (2010); Lecoutre, Lecoutre, and Poitevineau (2010); and Maraun and Gabriel (2010). Cumming G Psychol Methods; 2010 Jun; 15(2):192-8. PubMed ID: 20515240 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. P pep replicates: comment prompted by Iverson, Wagenmakers, and Lee (2010); Lecoutre, Lecoutre, and Poitevineau (2010); and Maraun and Gabriel (2010). Killeen PR Psychol Methods; 2010 Jun; 15(2):199-202. PubMed ID: 20515241 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Aggregate and individual replication probability within an explicit model of the research process. Miller J; Schwarz W Psychol Methods; 2011 Sep; 16(3):337-60. PubMed ID: 21534683 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Regarding p rep: comment prompted by Iverson, Wagenmakers, and Lee (2010); Lecoutre, Lecoutre, and Poitevineau (2010); and Maraun and Gabriel (2010). Serlin RC Psychol Methods; 2010 Jun; 15(2):203-8. PubMed ID: 20515242 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Replication is not coincidence: reply to Iverson, Lee, and Wagenmakers (2009). Lecoutre B; Killeen PR Psychon Bull Rev; 2010 Apr; 17(2):263-9; author reply 270-2. PubMed ID: 20382930 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A tutorial on a practical Bayesian alternative to null-hypothesis significance testing. Masson ME Behav Res Methods; 2011 Sep; 43(3):679-90. PubMed ID: 21302025 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Equivalence of the statistics for replicability and area under the ROC curve. Irwin RJ Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2009 Nov; 62(Pt 3):485-7. PubMed ID: 19017433 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Bayesian t tests for accepting and rejecting the null hypothesis. Rouder JN; Speckman PL; Sun D; Morey RD; Iverson G Psychon Bull Rev; 2009 Apr; 16(2):225-37. PubMed ID: 19293088 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. P(rep) misestimates the probability of replication. Iverson GJ; Lee MD; Wagenmakers EJ Psychon Bull Rev; 2009 Apr; 16(2):424-9. PubMed ID: 19293117 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Statistical significance--a misconstrued notion in medical research. Nurminen M Scand J Work Environ Health; 1997 Jun; 23(3):232-5. PubMed ID: 9243735 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Bayesian hypothesis testing-use in interpretation of measurements. Miller G; Martz H; Little T; Bertelli L Health Phys; 2008 Mar; 94(3):248-54. PubMed ID: 18301098 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. An R package for state-trace analysis. Prince M; Hawkins G; Love J; Heathcote A Behav Res Methods; 2012 Sep; 44(3):644-55. PubMed ID: 22806707 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A critique of the false-positive report probability. Lucke JF Genet Epidemiol; 2009 Feb; 33(2):145-50. PubMed ID: 18720477 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. An alternative to null-hypothesis significance tests. Killeen PR Psychol Sci; 2005 May; 16(5):345-53. PubMed ID: 15869691 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Null misinterpretation in statistical testing and its impact on health risk assessment. Greenland S Prev Med; 2011 Oct; 53(4-5):225-8. PubMed ID: 21871481 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Adaptive learning via selectionism and Bayesianism, Part I: connection between the two. Zhang J Neural Netw; 2009 Apr; 22(3):220-8. PubMed ID: 19386469 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]