These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20515240)

  • 1. Replication, p rep, and confidence intervals: comment prompted by Iverson, Wagenmakers, and Lee (2010); Lecoutre, Lecoutre, and Poitevineau (2010); and Maraun and Gabriel (2010).
    Cumming G
    Psychol Methods; 2010 Jun; 15(2):192-8. PubMed ID: 20515240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. P pep replicates: comment prompted by Iverson, Wagenmakers, and Lee (2010); Lecoutre, Lecoutre, and Poitevineau (2010); and Maraun and Gabriel (2010).
    Killeen PR
    Psychol Methods; 2010 Jun; 15(2):199-202. PubMed ID: 20515241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Regarding p rep: comment prompted by Iverson, Wagenmakers, and Lee (2010); Lecoutre, Lecoutre, and Poitevineau (2010); and Maraun and Gabriel (2010).
    Serlin RC
    Psychol Methods; 2010 Jun; 15(2):203-8. PubMed ID: 20515242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Killeen's probability of replication and predictive probabilities: how to compute, use, and interpret them.
    Lecoutre B; Lecoutre MP; Poitevineau J
    Psychol Methods; 2010 Jun; 15(2):158-71. PubMed ID: 20515237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A model-averaging approach to replication: the case of p rep.
    Iverson GJ; Wagenmakers EJ; Lee MD
    Psychol Methods; 2010 Jun; 15(2):172-81. PubMed ID: 20515238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Killeen's (2005) p rep coefficient: logical and mathematical problems.
    Maraun M; Gabriel S
    Psychol Methods; 2010 Jun; 15(2):182-91. PubMed ID: 20515239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Replication is not coincidence: reply to Iverson, Lee, and Wagenmakers (2009).
    Lecoutre B; Killeen PR
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2010 Apr; 17(2):263-9; author reply 270-2. PubMed ID: 20382930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparing methods for calculating confidence intervals for vaccine efficacy.
    Ewell M
    Stat Med; 1996 Nov 15-30; 15(21-22):2379-92. PubMed ID: 8931208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Calculating the main alternatives to null-hypothesis-significance testing in between-subject experimental designs.
    Balluerka Lasa N; Vergara Iraeta AI; Arnau Gras J
    Psicothema; 2009 Feb; 21(1):141-51. PubMed ID: 19178869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Extracting a maximum of useful information from statistical research data.
    Sohlberg S; Andersson G
    Scand J Psychol; 2005 Feb; 46(1):69-77. PubMed ID: 15660635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. How often is prep close to the true replication probability?
    Trafimow D; MacDonald JA; Rice S; Clason DL
    Psychol Methods; 2010 Sep; 15(3):300-7. PubMed ID: 20822254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Count on your beliefs. Bayes--not the P value--measures credence].
    Taube A; Malmquist J
    Lakartidningen; 2001 Jul; 98(28-29):3208-11. PubMed ID: 11496808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Efficient computation of confidence intervals for Bayesian model predictions based on multidimensional parameter space.
    Smith AD; Genz A; Freiberger DM; Belenky G; Van Dongen HP
    Methods Enzymol; 2009; 454():213-31. PubMed ID: 19216928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. An improved effect size for single-case research: nonoverlap of all pairs.
    Parker RI; Vannest K
    Behav Ther; 2009 Dec; 40(4):357-67. PubMed ID: 19892081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Bayesian statistical inference enhances the interpretation of contemporary randomized controlled trials.
    Wijeysundera DN; Austin PC; Hux JE; Beattie WS; Laupacis A
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2009 Jan; 62(1):13-21.e5. PubMed ID: 18947971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A tutorial on a practical Bayesian alternative to null-hypothesis significance testing.
    Masson ME
    Behav Res Methods; 2011 Sep; 43(3):679-90. PubMed ID: 21302025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Confidence intervals and replication: where will the next mean fall?
    Cumming G; Maillardet R
    Psychol Methods; 2006 Sep; 11(3):217-27. PubMed ID: 16953701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Confidence limits of the probability of success in animal experiments and clinical studies: a Bayesian approach.
    Stavreva N; Stavrev P; Fallone GB
    Phys Med; 2009 Mar; 25(1):43-6. PubMed ID: 18280763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Confidence intervals for the binomial parameter: some new considerations.
    Reiczigel J
    Stat Med; 2003 Feb; 22(4):611-21. PubMed ID: 12590417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Confidence intervals for a ratio of two independent binomial proportions.
    Price RM; Bonett DG
    Stat Med; 2008 Nov; 27(26):5497-508. PubMed ID: 18781560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.