119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20515274)
1. Measurement performance goals: how they can be estimated and a view to managing them.
Kallner A
Scand J Clin Lab Invest Suppl; 2010; 242():34-9. PubMed ID: 20515274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Early standardization of high sensitivity troponin T reporting - a lost opportunity.
Kavsak PA
Clin Biochem; 2011 Jul; 44(10-11):758-9. PubMed ID: 21515252
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Standardization of protein biomarker measurements: is it feasible?
Schimmel H; Zegers I; Emons H
Scand J Clin Lab Invest Suppl; 2010; 242():27-33. PubMed ID: 20515273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Requirements for reproducibility, trueness and error of measurement in internal quality control schemes.
Bonvicini P; Metus P; Pavón MA; Tocchini M
Clin Chem Lab Med; 2003 May; 41(5):693-9. PubMed ID: 12812269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Verification/validation of the performances of analytical method].
Vassault A; Hulin A; Chapuzet E; Arnaud J; Giroud C;
Ann Biol Clin (Paris); 2010 Dec; 68 Spec No 1():247-94. PubMed ID: 21613021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Performance criteria for reference measurement procedures and reference materials.
Schimmel H; Zegers I
Clin Chem Lab Med; 2015 May; 53(6):899-904. PubMed ID: 25870968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Managing quality vs. measuring uncertainty in the medical laboratory.
Westgard JO
Clin Chem Lab Med; 2010; 48(1):31-40. PubMed ID: 19919330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Clinical validity: defining biomarker performance.
Bossuyt PM
Scand J Clin Lab Invest Suppl; 2010; 242():46-52. PubMed ID: 20515277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The need for a system of quality standards for modern quality management.
Westgard JO
Scand J Clin Lab Invest; 1999 Nov; 59(7):483-6. PubMed ID: 10667684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Recent advances in evaluating the prognostic value of a marker.
Dalton JE; Kattan MW
Scand J Clin Lab Invest Suppl; 2010; 242():59-62. PubMed ID: 20515279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Determining and verifying reference intervals in clinical laboratories].
Henny J
Ann Biol Clin (Paris); 2011; 69(2):229-37. PubMed ID: 21464019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Setting performance goals and evaluating total analytical error for diagnostic assays.
Krouwer JS
Clin Chem; 2002 Jun; 48(6 Pt 1):919-27. PubMed ID: 12029009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [The analytical reliability of clinical laboratory information and role of the standards in its support].
Men'shikov VV
Klin Lab Diagn; 2012 Dec; (12):52-3. PubMed ID: 23479979
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Uncertainty of measurement].
Giroud C; Arnaud J; Vassault A;
Ann Biol Clin (Paris); 2010 Dec; 68 Spec No 1():237-45. PubMed ID: 21613020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Laboratory standardization from the patient's point of view.
Hoeltge GA
Rinsho Byori; 2009 Jun; 57(6):549-53. PubMed ID: 19621787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Standardization of serum creatinine and estimated GFR in the Kidney Early Evaluation Program (KEEP).
Stevens LA; Stoycheff N
Am J Kidney Dis; 2008 Apr; 51(4 Suppl 2):S77-82. PubMed ID: 18359411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Promoting clinical and laboratory interaction by harmonization.
Plebani M; Panteghini M
Clin Chim Acta; 2014 May; 432():15-21. PubMed ID: 24120352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Optimization of results of laboratory measurements in patient biological specimens].
Kallner A; Khorovskaia LA; Emanuél' VL; Miagkova LM; Bondarenko IB
Klin Lab Diagn; 2002 Jul; (7):39-42. PubMed ID: 12187590
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Use of diagnostic accuracy as a metric for evaluating laboratory proficiency with microarray assays using mixed-tissue RNA reference samples.
Pine PS; Boedigheimer M; Rosenzweig BA; Turpaz Y; He YD; Delenstarr G; Ganter B; Jarnagin K; Jones WD; Reid LH; Thompson KL
Pharmacogenomics; 2008 Nov; 9(11):1753-63. PubMed ID: 19018728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Assessment and statistical modeling of the relationship between remotely sensed aerosol optical depth and PM2.5 in the eastern United States.
Paciorek CJ; Liu Y;
Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2012 May; (167):5-83; discussion 85-91. PubMed ID: 22838153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
