BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

1980 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20515358)

  • 1. Biomechanical comparison of single-level posterior versus transforaminal lumbar interbody fusions with bilateral pedicle screw fixation: segmental stability and the effects on adjacent motion segments.
    Sim HB; Murovic JA; Cho BY; Lim TJ; Park J
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2010 Jun; 12(6):700-8. PubMed ID: 20515358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: the effect of various instrumentation techniques on the flexibility of the lumbar spine.
    Harris BM; Hilibrand AS; Savas PE; Pellegrino A; Vaccaro AR; Siegler S; Albert TJ
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2004 Feb; 29(4):E65-70. PubMed ID: 15094547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Biomechanical analysis of an interspinous fusion device as a stand-alone and as supplemental fixation to posterior expandable interbody cages in the lumbar spine.
    Gonzalez-Blohm SA; Doulgeris JJ; Aghayev K; Lee WE; Volkov A; Vrionis FD
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2014 Feb; 20(2):209-19. PubMed ID: 24286528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Biomechanical stability of unilateral pedicle screw fixation on cadaveric model simulated two-level posterior lumbar interbody fusion].
    Dong JW; Feng F; Zhao WD; Rong LM; Liu XM
    Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2011 May; 49(5):436-9. PubMed ID: 21733402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Primary stiffness of a modified transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion cage with integrated screw fixation: cadaveric biomechanical study.
    Keiler A; Schmoelz W; Erhart S; Gnanalingham K
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2014 Aug; 39(17):E994-E1000. PubMed ID: 24875958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Stability of transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in the setting of retained facets and posterior fixation using transfacet or standard pedicle screws.
    Chin KR; Reis MT; Reyes PM; Newcomb AG; Neagoe A; Gabriel JP; Sung RD; Crawford NR
    Spine J; 2015 May; 15(5):1077-82. PubMed ID: 24210638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Biomechanical evaluation of lateral lumbar interbody fusion with secondary augmentation.
    Reis MT; Reyes PM; Bse ; Altun I; Newcomb AG; Singh V; Chang SW; Kelly BP; Crawford NR
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2016 Dec; 25(6):720-726. PubMed ID: 27391398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Biomechanical analysis of an expandable lateral cage and a static transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion cage with posterior instrumentation in an in vitro spondylolisthesis model.
    Mantell M; Cyriac M; Haines CM; Gudipally M; O'Brien JR
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2016 Jan; 24(1):32-8. PubMed ID: 26384133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Biomechanical analysis of a novel posterior construct in a transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion model an in vitro study.
    Sethi A; Muzumdar AM; Ingalhalikar A; Vaidya R
    Spine J; 2011 Sep; 11(9):863-9. PubMed ID: 21802998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Would an anatomically shaped lumbar interbody cage provide better stability? An in vitro cadaveric biomechanical evaluation.
    Tsitsopoulos PP; Serhan H; Voronov LI; Carandang G; Havey RM; Ghanayem AJ; Patwardhan AG
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2012 Dec; 25(8):E240-4. PubMed ID: 22362111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Biomechanical comparison of anterior lumbar interbody fusion and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.
    Ploumis A; Wu C; Fischer G; Mehbod AA; Wu W; Faundez A; Transfeldt EE
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2008 Apr; 21(2):120-5. PubMed ID: 18391717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. In vitro study of biomechanical behavior of anterior and transforaminal lumbar interbody instrumentation techniques.
    Niemeyer TK; Koriller M; Claes L; Kettler A; Werner K; Wilke HJ
    Neurosurgery; 2006 Dec; 59(6):1271-6; discussion 1276-7. PubMed ID: 17277690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Novel pedicle screw and plate system provides superior stability in unilateral fixation for minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: an in vitro biomechanical study.
    Li J; Xiao H; Zhu Q; Zhou Y; Li C; Liu H; Huang Z; Shang J
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(3):e0123134. PubMed ID: 25807513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Biomechanical effect of transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and axial interbody threaded rod on range of motion and S1 screw loading in a destabilized L5-S1 spondylolisthesis model.
    Fleischer GD; Hart D; Ferrara LA; Freeman AL; Avidano EE
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2014 Jan; 39(2):E82-8. PubMed ID: 24150429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A Comparative Biomechanical Analysis of Stand Alone Versus Facet Screw and Pedicle Screw Augmented Lateral Interbody Arthrodesis: An In Vitro Human Cadaveric Model.
    Kretzer RM; Molina C; Hu N; Umekoji H; Baaj AA; Serhan H; Cunningham BW
    Clin Spine Surg; 2016 Aug; 29(7):E336-43. PubMed ID: 27137151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Bilateral pedicle screw fixation provides superior biomechanical stability in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a finite element study.
    Ambati DV; Wright EK; Lehman RA; Kang DG; Wagner SC; Dmitriev AE
    Spine J; 2015 Aug; 15(8):1812-22. PubMed ID: 24983669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Less invasive posterior fixation method following transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a biomechanical analysis.
    Slucky AV; Brodke DS; Bachus KN; Droge JA; Braun JT
    Spine J; 2006; 6(1):78-85. PubMed ID: 16413452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Biomechanical analysis of a newly developed shape memory alloy hook in a transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) in vitro model.
    Wang X; Xu J; Zhu Y; Li J; Zhou S; Tian S; Xiang Y; Liu X; Zheng Y; Pan T
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(12):e114326. PubMed ID: 25474112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Revision strategies for single- and two-level total disc arthroplasty procedures: a biomechanical perspective.
    Cunningham BW; Hu N; Beatson HJ; Serhan H; Sefter JC; McAfee PC
    Spine J; 2009 Sep; 9(9):735-43. PubMed ID: 19477694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Does the Choice of Spinal Interbody Fusion Approach Significantly Affect Adjacent Segment Mobility?
    Wangsawatwong P; Sawa AGU; Pereira BA; Lehrman JN; Turner JD; Uribe JS; Kelly BP
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2021 Nov; 46(21):E1119-E1124. PubMed ID: 34618704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 99.