These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

101 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20515375)

  • 1. Using the cumulative deviation method for cross-institutional benchmarking in the Berlin progress test.
    Schauber S; Nouns ZM
    Med Teach; 2010; 32(6):471-5. PubMed ID: 20515375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Benchmarking by cross-institutional comparison of student achievement in a progress test.
    Muijtjens AM; Schuwirth LW; Cohen-Schotanus J; Thoben AJ; van der Vleuten CP
    Med Educ; 2008 Jan; 42(1):82-8. PubMed ID: 18181848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Differences in knowledge development exposed by multi-curricular progress test data.
    Muijtjens AM; Schuwirth LW; Cohen-Schotanus J; van der Vleuten CP
    Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2008 Dec; 13(5):593-605. PubMed ID: 17479352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The versatility of progress testing assessed in an international context: a start for benchmarking global standardization?
    Verhoeven BH; Snellen-Balendong HA; Hay IT; Boon JM; van der Linde MJ; Blitz-Lindeque JJ; Hoogenboom RJ; Verwijnen GM; Wijnen WH; Scherpbier AJ; van der Vleuten CP
    Med Teach; 2005 Sep; 27(6):514-20. PubMed ID: 16199358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Progress testing in German speaking countries.
    Nouns ZM; Georg W
    Med Teach; 2010; 32(6):467-70. PubMed ID: 20515374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Standard setting for progress tests: combining external and internal standards.
    Ricketts C; Freeman AC; Coombes LR
    Med Educ; 2009 Jun; 43(6):589-93. PubMed ID: 19493184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cross institutional collaboration in assessment: a case on progress testing.
    van der Vleuten CP; Schuwirth LW; Muijtjens AM; Thoben AJ; Cohen-Schotanus J; van Boven CP
    Med Teach; 2004 Dec; 26(8):719-25. PubMed ID: 15763876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Can computer-based assessment enhance the acceptance of formative multiple choice exams? A utility analysis.
    Karay Y; Schauber SK; Stosch C; Schuettpelz-Brauns K
    Med Teach; 2012; 34(4):292-6. PubMed ID: 22404878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Flexible electronic feedback using the virtues of progress testing.
    Muijtjens AM; Timmermans I; Donkers J; Peperkamp R; Medema H; Cohen-Schotanus J; Thoben A; Wenink AC; van der Vleuten CP
    Med Teach; 2010; 32(6):491-5. PubMed ID: 20515379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Progress testing in resource-poor countries: a case from Mozambique.
    Aarts R; Steidel K; Manuel BA; Driessen EW
    Med Teach; 2010; 32(6):461-3. PubMed ID: 20515372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cumulative achievement testing: progress testing in reverse.
    Swanson DB; Holtzman KZ; Butler A;
    Med Teach; 2010; 32(6):516-20. PubMed ID: 20515385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Benchmarking progress tests for cross-institutional comparisons: every road makes a difference and all of them have bumps.
    Albanese M
    Med Educ; 2008 Jan; 42(1):4-7. PubMed ID: 18181841
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The profession of medicine: a joint US-German collaborative project in medical education.
    Tillmanns RW; Ringwelski A; Kretschmann J; Spangler LD; Curry RH
    Med Teach; 2007 Nov; 29(9):e269-75. PubMed ID: 18158651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Measurement practices: methods for developing content-valid student examinations.
    Bridge PD; Musial J; Frank R; Roe T; Sawilowsky S
    Med Teach; 2003 Jul; 25(4):414-21. PubMed ID: 12893554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Essential steps in implementing a comprehensive testing and review program.
    Jones JH; Bremner MN
    Nurse Educ; 2008; 33(5):206-9. PubMed ID: 18769322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Competence in the musculoskeletal system: assessing the progression of knowledge through an undergraduate medical course.
    Basu S; Roberts C; Newble DI; Snaith M
    Med Educ; 2004 Dec; 38(12):1253-60. PubMed ID: 15566536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A comprehensive model for the selection of medical students.
    Bore M; Munro D; Powis D
    Med Teach; 2009 Dec; 31(12):1066-72. PubMed ID: 19995169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Choosing and designing knowledge assessments: experience at a new medical school.
    Freeman AC; Ricketts C
    Med Teach; 2010; 32(7):578-81. PubMed ID: 20653380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Collaboration on progress testing in medical schools in the Netherlands.
    Schuwirth L; Bosman G; Henning RH; Rinkel R; Wenink AC
    Med Teach; 2010; 32(6):476-9. PubMed ID: 20515376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Quality assurance, benchmarking, assessment and mutual international recognition of qualifications.
    Hobson R; Rolland S; Rotgans J; Schoonheim-Klein M; Best H; Chomyszyn-Gajewska M; Dymock D; Essop R; Hupp J; Kundzina R; Love R; Memon RA; Moola M; Neumann L; Ozden N; Roth K; Samwel P; Villavicencio J; Wright P; Harzer W
    Eur J Dent Educ; 2008 Feb; 12 Suppl 1():92-100. PubMed ID: 18289272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.