These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20515545)

  • 1. Validation of a multi-source feedback tool for use in general practice.
    Campbell J; Narayanan A; Burford B; Greco M
    Educ Prim Care; 2010 May; 21(3):165-79. PubMed ID: 20515545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Multisource feedback in evaluating the performance of doctors: the example of the UK General Medical Council patient and colleague questionnaires.
    Wright C; Richards SH; Hill JJ; Roberts MJ; Norman GR; Greco M; Taylor MR; Campbell JL
    Acad Med; 2012 Dec; 87(12):1668-78. PubMed ID: 23095930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Assessing the professional performance of UK doctors: an evaluation of the utility of the General Medical Council patient and colleague questionnaires.
    Campbell JL; Richards SH; Dickens A; Greco M; Narayanan A; Brearley S
    Qual Saf Health Care; 2008 Jun; 17(3):187-93. PubMed ID: 18519625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Self-other agreement in multisource feedback: the influence of doctor and rater group characteristics.
    Roberts MJ; Campbell JL; Richards SH; Wright C
    J Contin Educ Health Prof; 2013; 33(1):14-23. PubMed ID: 23512556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Commentary: the role of appraisal and multisource feedback in the UK General Medical Council's new revalidation system.
    Rubin P
    Acad Med; 2012 Dec; 87(12):1654-6. PubMed ID: 23187912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. What is a good general practitioner (GP)? The development and evaluation of a multi-source feedback instrument for GP appraisal.
    Shepherd A; Lough M
    Educ Prim Care; 2010 May; 21(3):149-64. PubMed ID: 20515544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A multi-method analysis of free-text comments from the UK General Medical Council Colleague Questionnaires.
    Richards SH; Campbell JL; Walshaw E; Dickens A; Greco M
    Med Educ; 2009 Aug; 43(8):757-66. PubMed ID: 19659489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. User perceptions of multi-source feedback tools for junior doctors.
    Burford B; Illing J; Kergon C; Morrow G; Livingston M
    Med Educ; 2010 Feb; 44(2):165-76. PubMed ID: 20059677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Multisource feedback questionnaires in appraisal and for revalidation: a qualitative study in UK general practice.
    Hill JJ; Asprey A; Richards SH; Campbell JL
    Br J Gen Pract; 2012 May; 62(598):e314-21. PubMed ID: 22546590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of physicians' professional performance: an iterative development and validation study of multisource feedback instruments.
    Overeem K; Wollersheim HC; Arah OA; Cruijsberg JK; Grol RP; Lombarts KM
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2012 Mar; 12():80. PubMed ID: 22448816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Getting the questions right: non-compound questions are more reliable than compound questions on matched multi-source feedback instruments.
    Mackillop L; Parker-Swift J; Crossley J
    Med Educ; 2011 Aug; 45(8):843-8. PubMed ID: 21752081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Multisource feedback for radiation oncologists.
    Vinod SK; Lonergan DM
    J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2013 Jun; 57(3):384-9. PubMed ID: 23721151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A single generic multi-source feedback tool for revalidation of all UK career-grade doctors: does one size fit all?
    Mackillop LH; Crossley J; Vivekananda-Schmidt P; Wade W; Armitage M
    Med Teach; 2011; 33(2):e75-83. PubMed ID: 21275537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Multisource feedback as part of the Medical Board of Australia's Professional Performance Framework: outcomes from a preliminary study.
    Narayanan A; Farmer EA; Greco MJ
    BMC Med Educ; 2018 Dec; 18(1):323. PubMed ID: 30594157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The reliability of workplace-based assessment in postgraduate medical education and training: a national evaluation in general practice in the United Kingdom.
    Murphy DJ; Bruce DA; Mercer SW; Eva KW
    Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2009 May; 14(2):219-32. PubMed ID: 18306052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Interpreting multisource feedback: online study of consensus and variation among GP appraisers.
    Wright C; Campbell J; McGowan L; Roberts MJ; Jelley D; Chatterjee A
    Br J Gen Pract; 2016 Apr; 66(645):e277-84. PubMed ID: 26965027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Multisource feedback in the assessment of physician competencies.
    Lockyer J
    J Contin Educ Health Prof; 2003; 23(1):4-12. PubMed ID: 12739254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Factors that might undermine the validity of patient and multi-source feedback.
    Archer JC; McAvoy P
    Med Educ; 2011 Sep; 45(9):886-93. PubMed ID: 21848716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Using a 'peer assessment questionnaire' in primary medical care.
    Elwyn G; Lewis M; Evans R; Hutchings H
    Br J Gen Pract; 2005 Sep; 55(518):690-5. PubMed ID: 16176736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Revalidation - a personal reflection.
    Dawda P
    Aust Fam Physician; 2013 Nov; 42(11):826-8. PubMed ID: 24217109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.