These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. Feedback enhances the positive effects and reduces the negative effects of multiple-choice testing. Butler AC; Roediger HL Mem Cognit; 2008 Apr; 36(3):604-16. PubMed ID: 18491500 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Memorial consequences of answering SAT II questions. Marsh EJ; Agarwal PK; Roediger HL J Exp Psychol Appl; 2009 Mar; 15(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 19309212 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The positive and negative consequences of multiple-choice testing. Roediger HL; Marsh EJ J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2005 Sep; 31(5):1155-9. PubMed ID: 16248758 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The memorial consequences of multiple-choice testing. Marsh EJ; Roediger HL; Bjork RA; Bjork EL Psychon Bull Rev; 2007 Apr; 14(2):194-9. PubMed ID: 17694900 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. "None of the above" as a correct and incorrect alternative on a multiple-choice test: implications for the testing effect. Odegard TN; Koen JD Memory; 2007 Nov; 15(8):873-85. PubMed ID: 17965982 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A role for familiarity in supporting the testing effect over time. Shaffer RA; McDermott KB Neuropsychologia; 2020 Feb; 138():107298. PubMed ID: 31838098 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. How "none of the above" (NOTA) affects the accessibility of tested and related information in multiple-choice questions. Blendermann MF; Little JL; Gray KM Memory; 2020 Apr; 28(4):473-480. PubMed ID: 32106781 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. All of the above: When multiple correct response options enhance the testing effect. Bishara AJ; Lanzo LA Memory; 2015; 23(7):1013-28. PubMed ID: 25122187 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Delayed, but not immediate, feedback after multiple-choice questions increases performance on a subsequent short-answer, but not multiple-choice, exam: evidence for the dual-process theory of memory. Sinha N; Glass AL J Gen Psychol; 2015; 142(2):118-34. PubMed ID: 25832741 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Can Multiple-Choice Testing Induce Desirable Difficulties? Evidence from the Laboratory and the Classroom. Bjork EL; Soderstrom NC; Little JL Am J Psychol; 2015; 128(2):229-39. PubMed ID: 26255442 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Optimizing multiple-choice tests as tools for learning. Little JL; Bjork EL Mem Cognit; 2015 Jan; 43(1):14-26. PubMed ID: 25123774 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Multiple-choice tests exonerated, at least of some charges: fostering test-induced learning and avoiding test-induced forgetting. Little JL; Bjork EL; Bjork RA; Angello G Psychol Sci; 2012; 23(11):1337-44. PubMed ID: 23034566 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The Effect of Type of Feedback in Multiple-Choice Testing on Long-Term Retention. Jang Y; Marshall E J Gen Psychol; 2018; 145(2):107-119. PubMed ID: 29547068 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Multiple-choice pretesting potentiates learning of related information. Little JL; Bjork EL Mem Cognit; 2016 Oct; 44(7):1085-101. PubMed ID: 27177505 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Student retention of course content is improved by collaborative-group testing. Cortright RN; Collins HL; Rodenbaugh DW; DiCarlo SE Adv Physiol Educ; 2003 Dec; 27(1-4):102-8. PubMed ID: 12928319 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Retrieval practice with short-answer, multiple-choice, and hybrid tests. Smith MA; Karpicke JD Memory; 2014; 22(7):784-802. PubMed ID: 24059563 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]