These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20516221)

  • 21. Retrieval practice with short-answer, multiple-choice, and hybrid tests.
    Smith MA; Karpicke JD
    Memory; 2014; 22(7):784-802. PubMed ID: 24059563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Effect of delay on recognition decisions: evidence for a criterion shift.
    Singer M; Wixted JT
    Mem Cognit; 2006 Jan; 34(1):125-37. PubMed ID: 16686112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The effect of type and timing of feedback on learning from multiple-choice tests.
    Butler AC; Karpicke JD; Roediger HL
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2007 Dec; 13(4):273-81. PubMed ID: 18194050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Cued recall from image and sentence memory: a shift from episodic to identical elements representation.
    Rickard TC; Bajic D
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Jul; 32(4):734-48. PubMed ID: 16822144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Mood-congruent false memories persist over time.
    Knott LM; Thorley C
    Cogn Emot; 2014; 28(5):903-12. PubMed ID: 24294987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Robust recollection rejection in the memory conjunction paradigm.
    Lampinen JM; Odegard TN; Neuschatz JS
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2004 Mar; 30(2):332-42. PubMed ID: 14979808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Multiple-choice tests stabilize access to marginal knowledge.
    Cantor AD; Eslick AN; Marsh EJ; Bjork RA; Bjork EL
    Mem Cognit; 2015 Feb; 43(2):193-205. PubMed ID: 25201690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Paradoxical effects of testing: repeated retrieval attempts enhance the likelihood of later accurate and false recall.
    McDermott KB
    Mem Cognit; 2006 Mar; 34(2):261-7. PubMed ID: 16752590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The effects of divided attention at study and test on false recognition: a comparison of DRM and categorized lists.
    Knott LM; Dewhurst SA
    Mem Cognit; 2007 Dec; 35(8):1954-65. PubMed ID: 18265611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Altering memory through recall: the effects of cue-guided retrieval processing.
    McDaniel MA; Kowitz MD; Dunay PK
    Mem Cognit; 1989 Jul; 17(4):423-34. PubMed ID: 2761400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Implicitly activated memories are associated to general context cues.
    Nelson DL; Goodmon LB; Akirmak U
    Mem Cognit; 2007 Dec; 35(8):1878-91. PubMed ID: 18265605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Effects of list organization and retrieval cues on children's delayed recall.
    Ramisetty-Mikler S
    J Genet Psychol; 1992 Dec; 153(4):421-33. PubMed ID: 1295954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. When does testing enhance retention? A distribution-based interpretation of retrieval as a memory modifier.
    Halamish V; Bjork RA
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 Jul; 37(4):801-12. PubMed ID: 21480751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The impact of cueing on written examinations of clinical decision making: a case study.
    Desjardins I; Touchie C; Pugh D; Wood TJ; Humphrey-Murto S
    Med Educ; 2014 Mar; 48(3):255-61. PubMed ID: 24528460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Diminished testing benefits in young adults with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder.
    Dudukovic NM; Gottshall JL; Cavanaugh PA; Moody CT
    Memory; 2015; 23(8):1264-76. PubMed ID: 25385006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Recollection rejection: gist cuing of verbatim memory.
    Odegard TN; Lampinen JM
    Mem Cognit; 2005 Dec; 33(8):1422-30. PubMed ID: 16615390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Probing memory with conceptual cues at multiple retention intervals: a comparison of forgetting rates on implicit and explicit tests.
    Goshen-Gottstein Y; Kempinsky H
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2001 Mar; 8(1):139-46. PubMed ID: 11340859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Strategies of text retrieval: a criterion shift account.
    Singer M; Gagnon N; Richards E
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2002 Mar; 56(1):41-57. PubMed ID: 11901960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Attention effects during visual short-term memory maintenance: protection or prioritization?
    Matsukura M; Luck SJ; Vecera SP
    Percept Psychophys; 2007 Nov; 69(8):1422-34. PubMed ID: 18078232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. How do Students Regulate Their Use of Multiple Choice Practice Tests?
    Badali S; Rawson KA; Dunlosky J
    Educ Psychol Rev; 2023; 35(2):43. PubMed ID: 37013110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.