These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

193 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20516229)

  • 1. Crossmodal action selection: evidence from dual-task compatibility.
    Huestegge L; Koch I
    Mem Cognit; 2010 Jun; 38(4):493-501. PubMed ID: 20516229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Eliminating dual-task costs by minimizing crosstalk between tasks: The role of modality and feature pairings.
    Göthe K; Oberauer K; Kliegl R
    Cognition; 2016 May; 150():92-108. PubMed ID: 26878090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The role of temporal unpredictability for process interference and code overlap in perception-action dual tasks.
    Koch I; Metin B; Schuch S
    Psychol Res; 2003 Nov; 67(4):244-52. PubMed ID: 12684780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The role of crosstalk in dual-task performance: evidence from manipulating response-code overlap.
    Koch I
    Psychol Res; 2009 May; 73(3):417-24. PubMed ID: 18443819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Dual-task crosstalk between saccades and manual responses.
    Huestegge L; Koch I
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2009 Apr; 35(2):352-62. PubMed ID: 19331493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Dissociation of S-R compatibility and Simon effects with mixed tasks and mappings.
    Proctor RW; Yamaguchi M; Dutt V; Gonzalez C
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2013 Apr; 39(2):593-609. PubMed ID: 22963231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Backward crosstalk and the role of dimensional overlap within and between tasks.
    Huestegge L; Pieczykolan A; Janczyk M
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2018 Jul; 188():139-147. PubMed ID: 29933176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effect of visual-verbal load and spatial compatibility on stimulus response.
    Huang WS; Hsu CC; Liu CC; Lai CH
    Psychol Rep; 2011 Apr; 108(2):487-502. PubMed ID: 21675563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The functional neuroanatomy of multitasking: combining dual tasking with a short term memory task.
    Deprez S; Vandenbulcke M; Peeters R; Emsell L; Amant F; Sunaert S
    Neuropsychologia; 2013 Sep; 51(11):2251-60. PubMed ID: 23938320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Task-set inertia and memory-consolidation bottleneck in dual tasks.
    Koch I; Rumiati RI
    Psychol Res; 2006 Nov; 70(6):448-58. PubMed ID: 16215746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The interplay of crossmodal attentional preparation and modality compatibility in cued task switching.
    Fintor E; Stephan DN; Koch I
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2019 Apr; 72(4):955-965. PubMed ID: 29642783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The control of stimulus-driven saccades is subject not to central, but to visual attention limitations.
    Carbone E; Schneider WX
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Nov; 72(8):2168-75. PubMed ID: 21097860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The neural effect of stimulus-response modality compatibility on dual-task performance: an fMRI study.
    Stelzel C; Schumacher EH; Schubert T; D'Esposito M
    Psychol Res; 2006 Nov; 70(6):514-25. PubMed ID: 16175414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Crosstalk, not resource competition, as a source of dual-task costs: Evidence from manipulating stimulus-action effect conceptual compatibility.
    Schacherer J; Hazeltine E
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2021 Aug; 28(4):1224-1232. PubMed ID: 33689145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. More insight into the interplay of response selection and visual attention in dual-tasks: masked visual search and response selection are performed in parallel.
    Reimer CB; Schubert T
    Psychol Res; 2019 Apr; 83(3):459-475. PubMed ID: 28917014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Sources of interference in cross-modal action: response selection, crosstalk, and general dual-execution costs.
    Pieczykolan A; Huestegge L
    Psychol Res; 2018 Jan; 82(1):109-120. PubMed ID: 28956154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Sequence learning at optimal stimulus-response mapping: evidence from a serial reaction time task.
    Kinder A; Rolfs M; Kliegl R
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2008 Feb; 61(2):203-9. PubMed ID: 17886161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The role of visual working memory (VWM) in the control of gaze during visual search.
    Hollingworth A; Luck SJ
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 May; 71(4):936-49. PubMed ID: 19429970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Do small dual-task costs reflect ideomotor compatibility or the absence of crosstalk?
    Halvorson KM; Hazeltine E
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2015 Oct; 22(5):1403-9. PubMed ID: 25754530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Sensory-motor modality compatibility in multitasking: The influence of processing codes.
    Schaeffner S; Koch I; Philipp AM
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2018 Nov; 191():210-218. PubMed ID: 30312892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.