These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. Trends in material choice for direct restorations by final year students from University College Cork 2004-2009. O'Sullivan CO; McKenna GJ; Burke FM Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2012 Mar; 20(1):31-4. PubMed ID: 22474934 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effects of enamel-bonding, type of restoration, patient age and operator on the longevity of an anterior composite resin. Smales RJ Am J Dent; 1991 Jun; 4(3):130-3. PubMed ID: 1830747 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Nine-year evaluation of a polyacid-modified resin composite/resin composite open sandwich technique in Class II cavities. Lindberg A; van Dijken JW; Lindberg M J Dent; 2007 Feb; 35(2):124-9. PubMed ID: 16956709 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Attitudes of some European dental undergraduate students to the placement of direct restorative materials in posterior teeth. Lynch CD; Guillem SE; Nagrani B; Gilmour AS; Ericson D J Oral Rehabil; 2010 Dec; 37(12):916-26. PubMed ID: 20557432 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A retrospective clinical study on longevity of posterior composite and amalgam restorations. Opdam NJ; Bronkhorst EM; Roeters JM; Loomans BA Dent Mater; 2007 Jan; 23(1):2-8. PubMed ID: 16417916 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Failure risk of posterior composites with post-operative sensitivity. Hayashi M; Wilson NH Oper Dent; 2003; 28(6):681-8. PubMed ID: 14653280 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Eighteen-month clinical evaluation of microhybrid, packable and nanofilled resin composites in Class I restorations. Sadeghi M; Lynch CD; Shahamat N J Oral Rehabil; 2010 Jul; 37(7):532-7. PubMed ID: 20202097 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Durability of resin composite restorations in high C-factor cavities: a 12-year follow-up. van Dijken JW J Dent; 2010 Jun; 38(6):469-74. PubMed ID: 20193727 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A clinical evaluation of posterior composite restorations: 17-year findings. da Rosa Rodolpho PA; Cenci MS; Donassollo TA; Loguércio AD; Demarco FF J Dent; 2006 Aug; 34(7):427-35. PubMed ID: 16314023 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Selection of dental materials and longevity of replaced restorations in Public Dental Health clinics in northern Sweden. Sunnegårdh-Grönberg K; van Dijken JW; Funegård U; Lindberg A; Nilsson M J Dent; 2009 Sep; 37(9):673-8. PubMed ID: 19477572 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Teaching of posterior resin-based composite restorations in Brazilian dental schools. Gordan VV; Mjör IA; Veiga Filho LC; Ritter AV Quintessence Int; 2000; 31(10):735-40. PubMed ID: 11204001 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Dental treatment profile of New Zealand Defence Force personnel. Logan TP; Cutress TW; Garrett N; Trengrove HG N Z Dent J; 2009 Sep; 105(3):77-81. PubMed ID: 19772107 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. How well do fourth year Wits dental students place resin composite restorations? Lightfoot J; Clarke FM; Grossman ES SADJ; 2003 Mar; 58(2):56-61. PubMed ID: 12800265 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Decisions of practitioners regarding placement of amalgam and composite restorations in general practice settings. Pink FE; Minden NJ; Simmonds S Oper Dent; 1994; 19(4):127-32. PubMed ID: 9028231 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Studies on posterior composite resins with special reference to class II restorations. Lundin SA Swed Dent J Suppl; 1990; 73():1-41. PubMed ID: 2264013 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Three-year clinical evaluation of a flowable and a hybrid resin composite in non-carious cervical lesions. Kubo S; Yokota H; Yokota H; Hayashi Y J Dent; 2010 Mar; 38(3):191-200. PubMed ID: 19840829 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]