BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

516 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20517080)

  • 1. Patient satisfaction in postmastectomy breast reconstruction: a comparative evaluation of DIEP, TRAM, latissimus flap, and implant techniques.
    Yueh JH; Slavin SA; Adesiyun T; Nyame TT; Gautam S; Morris DJ; Tobias AM; Lee BT
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2010 Jun; 125(6):1585-1595. PubMed ID: 20517080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Outcomes of delayed abdominal-based autologous reconstruction versus latissimus dorsi flap plus implant reconstruction in previously irradiated patients.
    Levine SM; Patel N; Disa JJ
    Ann Plast Surg; 2012 Oct; 69(4):380-2. PubMed ID: 22964681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Breast reconstruction with superficial inferior epigastric artery flaps: a prospective comparison with TRAM and DIEP flaps.
    Chevray PM
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2004 Oct; 114(5):1077-83; discussion 1084-5. PubMed ID: 15457015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Determinants of patient satisfaction in postmastectomy breast reconstruction.
    Alderman AK; Wilkins EG; Lowery JC; Kim M; Davis JA
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2000 Sep; 106(4):769-76. PubMed ID: 11007387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Quality of Life and Patient-Reported Outcomes in Breast Cancer Survivors: A Multicenter Comparison of Four Abdominally Based Autologous Reconstruction Methods.
    Macadam SA; Zhong T; Weichman K; Papsdorf M; Lennox PA; Hazen A; Matros E; Disa J; Mehrara B; Pusic AL
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2016 Mar; 137(3):758-771. PubMed ID: 26910656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Double pedicle deep inferior epigastric perforator/muscle-sparing TRAM flaps for unilateral breast reconstruction.
    Agarwal JP; Gottlieb LJ
    Ann Plast Surg; 2007 Apr; 58(4):359-63. PubMed ID: 17413875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Inclusion of mesh in donor-site repair of free TRAM and muscle-sparing free TRAM flaps yields rates of abdominal complications comparable to those of DIEP flap reconstruction.
    Wan DC; Tseng CY; Anderson-Dam J; Dalio AL; Crisera CA; Festekjian JH
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2010 Aug; 126(2):367-374. PubMed ID: 20679822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. DIEP and pedicled TRAM flaps: a comparison of outcomes.
    Garvey PB; Buchel EW; Pockaj BA; Casey WJ; Gray RJ; Hernández JL; Samson TD
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2006 May; 117(6):1711-9; discussion 1720-1. PubMed ID: 16651940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of morbidity, functional outcome, and satisfaction following bilateral TRAM versus bilateral DIEP flap breast reconstruction.
    Chun YS; Sinha I; Turko A; Yueh JH; Lipsitz S; Pribaz JJ; Lee BT
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2010 Oct; 126(4):1133-1141. PubMed ID: 20555301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Analysis of complications and patient satisfaction in pedicled transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous and deep inferior epigastric perforator flap breast reconstruction.
    Momoh AO; Colakoglu S; Westvik TS; Curtis MS; Yueh JH; de Blacam C; Tobias AM; Lee BT
    Ann Plast Surg; 2012 Jul; 69(1):19-23. PubMed ID: 21659842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A systematic review of abdominal wall function following abdominal flaps for postmastectomy breast reconstruction.
    Atisha D; Alderman AK
    Ann Plast Surg; 2009 Aug; 63(2):222-30. PubMed ID: 19593108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Muscle-sparing TRAM flap does not protect breast reconstruction from postmastectomy radiation damage compared with the DIEP flap.
    Garvey PB; Clemens MW; Hoy AE; Smith B; Zhang H; Kronowitz SJ; Butler CE
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2014 Feb; 133(2):223-233. PubMed ID: 24469158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Postmastectomy breast reconstruction in the irradiated breast: a comparative study of DIEP and latissimus dorsi flap outcome.
    Lindegren A; Halle M; Docherty Skogh AC; Edsander-Nord Å
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2012 Jul; 130(1):10-18. PubMed ID: 22743867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A retrospective analysis of outcomes using three common methods for immediate breast reconstruction.
    Spear SL; Newman MK; Bedford MS; Schwartz KA; Cohen M; Schwartz JS
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2008 Aug; 122(2):340-347. PubMed ID: 18626348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Is Unipedicled Transverse Rectus Abdominis Myocutaneous Flap Obsolete Owing to Superiority of DIEP Flap?
    Leyngold MM
    Ann Plast Surg; 2018 Jun; 80(6S Suppl 6):S418-S420. PubMed ID: 29369109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of 2-Year Complication Rates Among Common Techniques for Postmastectomy Breast Reconstruction.
    Bennett KG; Qi J; Kim HM; Hamill JB; Pusic AL; Wilkins EG
    JAMA Surg; 2018 Oct; 153(10):901-908. PubMed ID: 29926077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Institutional review of free TRAM flap breast reconstruction.
    Knight MA; Nguyen DT; Kobayashi MR; Evans GR
    Ann Plast Surg; 2006 Jun; 56(6):593-8. PubMed ID: 16721068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Breast Reconstruction with the free TRAM or DIEP flap: patient selection, choice of flap, and outcome.
    Nahabedian MY; Momen B; Galdino G; Manson PN
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2002 Aug; 110(2):466-75; discussion 476-7. PubMed ID: 12142662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The differential effect of BMI on prosthetic versus autogenous breast reconstruction: a multivariate analysis of 12,986 patients.
    Hanwright PJ; Davila AA; Hirsch EM; Khan SA; Fine NA; Bilimoria KY; Kim JY
    Breast; 2013 Oct; 22(5):938-45. PubMed ID: 23769660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Is there a psychological and physiological difference between DIEP- and free TRAM-flap? A retrospective patient survey].
    Wurzer P; Spendel S; Kamolz LP; Parvizi D; Tuca A; Rappl T
    Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir; 2014 Aug; 46(4):256-62. PubMed ID: 25162244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 26.