BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20517103)

  • 1. Curvilinear mandibular distraction results and long-term stability effects in a group of 40 patients.
    Aizenbud D; Hazan-Molina H; Thimmappa B; Hopkins EM; Schendel SA
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2010 Jun; 125(6):1771-1780. PubMed ID: 20517103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Reliability of panoramic radiographs for the assessment of mandibular elongation after distraction osteogenesis procedures.
    Hazan-Molina H; Molina-Hazan V; Schendel SA; Aizenbud D
    Orthod Craniofac Res; 2011 Feb; 14(1):25-32. PubMed ID: 21205166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Clinical application of curvilinear distraction osteogenesis for correction of mandibular deformities.
    Kaban LB; Seldin EB; Kikinis R; Yeshwant K; Padwa BL; Troulis MJ
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 May; 67(5):996-1008. PubMed ID: 19375009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The importance of vector selection in preoperative planning of unilateral mandibular distraction.
    Dec W; Peltomaki T; Warren SM; Garfinkle JS; Grayson BH; McCarthy JG
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2008 Jun; 121(6):2084-2092. PubMed ID: 18520899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Mandibular hypoplasia with curvilinear distraction.
    Keçik D; Aydoğdu E; Ateş U; Uçkan S
    J Craniofac Surg; 2010 Jan; 21(1):168-73. PubMed ID: 20072008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The importance of vector selection in preoperative planning of bilateral mandibular distraction.
    Vendittelli BL; Dec W; Warren SM; Garfinkle JS; Grayson BH; McCarthy JG
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2008 Oct; 122(4):1144-1153. PubMed ID: 18827649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Long-Term Effects of Distraction Osteogenesis of the Mandible.
    Peacock ZS; Salcines A; Troulis MJ; Kaban LB
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2018 Jul; 76(7):1512-1523. PubMed ID: 29425758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effects of transmandibular symphyseal distraction on teeth, bone, and temporomandibular joint.
    Gunbay T; Akay MC; Aras A; Gomel M
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Oct; 67(10):2254-65. PubMed ID: 19761921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Five year follow-up of mandibular distraction osteogenesis on the dentofacial structures of syndromic children.
    Gürsoy S; Hukki J; Hurmerinta K
    Orthod Craniofac Res; 2008 Feb; 11(1):57-64. PubMed ID: 18199081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of skeletal and soft-tissue changes following unilateral mandibular distraction osteogenesis.
    Altug-Atac AT; Grayson BH; McCarthy JG
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2008 May; 121(5):1751-1759. PubMed ID: 18454000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Unilateral mandibular ramus elongation by intraoral distraction osteogenesis.
    Kofod T; Nørholt SE; Pedersen TK; Jensen J
    J Craniofac Surg; 2005 Mar; 16(2):247-54. PubMed ID: 15750421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Long-term stability and growth following unilateral mandibular distraction in growing children with craniofacial microsomia.
    Shetye PR; Grayson BH; Mackool RJ; McCarthy JG
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2006 Sep; 118(4):985-995. PubMed ID: 16980861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Long-term skeletal stability after maxillary advancement with distraction osteogenesis using a rigid external distraction device in cleft maxillary deformities.
    Figueroa AA; Polley JW; Friede H; Ko EW
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2004 Nov; 114(6):1382-92; discussion 1393-4. PubMed ID: 15509923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Distraction osteogenesis in the treatment of hemifacial microsomia].
    Kulewicz M; Cudzilo D; Hortis-Dzierzbicka M; Obloj B; Krol Z
    Med Wieku Rozwoj; 2004; 8(3 Pt 2):761-72. PubMed ID: 15858248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Mandibular distraction osteogenesis by sagittal split osteotomy and intraoral curvilinear distraction.
    Schendel SA; Linck DW
    J Craniofac Surg; 2004 Jul; 15(4):631-5. PubMed ID: 15213543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparative evaluation of vertical body osteotomy and sagittal split osteotomy for mandibular corpus distraction.
    Sahoo NK; Rangarajan H
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 Feb; 69(2):381-9. PubMed ID: 21111521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Mandibular distraction osteogenesis with multidirectional extraoral distraction device in hemifacial microsomia patients: three-dimensional treatment planning, prediction tracings, and case outcomes.
    Tharanon W; Sinn DP
    J Craniofac Surg; 1999 May; 10(3):202-13. PubMed ID: 10530229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Mandibular distraction combined with orthognathic techniques for the correction of severe adult mandibular hypoplasia.
    Yin L; Tang X; Shi L; Yin H; Zhang Z
    J Craniofac Surg; 2014 Nov; 25(6):1947-52. PubMed ID: 25377953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cephalometric analysis of the consolidation phase following bilateral pediatric mandibular distraction.
    Hopper RA; Altug AT; Grayson BH; Barillas I; Sato Y; Cutting CB; McCarthy JG
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2003 May; 40(3):233-40. PubMed ID: 12733950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Computer simulation of curvilinear mandibular distraction: accuracy and predictability.
    Scolozzi P; Link DW; Schendel SA
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2007 Dec; 120(7):1975-1980. PubMed ID: 18090762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.