76 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20517817)
1. Comparison of two co-registration methods for real-time ultrasonography fused with MRI: a phantom study.
Ewertsen C; Ellegaard K; Boesen M; Torp-Pedersen S; Bachmann Nielsen M
Ultraschall Med; 2010 Jun; 31(3):296-301. PubMed ID: 20517817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Interactive deformation registration of endorectal prostate MRI using ITK thin plate splines.
Cheung MR; Krishnan K
Acad Radiol; 2009 Mar; 16(3):351-7. PubMed ID: 19201364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Phantom Study Investigating the Accuracy of Manual and Automatic Image Fusion with the GE Logiq E9: Implications for use in Percutaneous Liver Interventions.
Burgmans MC; den Harder JM; Meershoek P; van den Berg NS; Chan SXJM; van Leeuwen FWB; van Erkel AR
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol; 2017 Jun; 40(6):914-923. PubMed ID: 28204959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Image fusion between ultrasonography and CT, MRI or PET/CT for image guidance and intervention - a theoretical and clinical study.
Ewertsen C
Dan Med Bull; 2010 Sep; 57(9):B4172. PubMed ID: 20816020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Merging molecular and anatomical information: a feasibility study on rodents using microPET and MRI.
Guo WY; Lee JJ; Lin MH; Yang CC; Chen CL; Huang YH; Tyan YS; Wu TH
Nucl Med Commun; 2007 Oct; 28(10):804-12. PubMed ID: 17728611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Impact of a self-developed planning and self-constructed navigation system on skull base surgery: 10 years experience.
Caversaccio M; Langlotz F; Nolte LP; Häusler R
Acta Otolaryngol; 2007 Apr; 127(4):403-7. PubMed ID: 17453461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Simultaneous ultrasound and MRI system for breast biopsy: compatibility assessment and demonstration in a dual modality phantom.
Tang AM; Kacher DF; Lam EY; Wong KK; Jolesz FA; Yang ES
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2008 Feb; 27(2):247-54. PubMed ID: 18334446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Optically neuronavigated ultrasonography in an intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging environment.
Katisko JP; Koivukangas JP
Neurosurgery; 2007 Apr; 60(4 Suppl 2):373-80; discussion 380-1. PubMed ID: 17415177
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of manual vs. automated multimodality (CT-MRI) image registration for brain tumors.
Sarkar A; Santiago RJ; Smith R; Kassaee A
Med Dosim; 2005; 30(1):20-4. PubMed ID: 15749007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Neuronavigation in intraoperative MRI.
Samset E; Hirschberg H
Comput Aided Surg; 1999; 4(4):200-7. PubMed ID: 10567098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Freehand biopsy guided by electromagnetic needle tracking: a phantom study.
Ewertsen C; Nielsen KR; Nielsen MB
Ultraschall Med; 2011 Dec; 32(6):614-8. PubMed ID: 22144128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Image fusion of MR images and real-time ultrasonography: evaluation of fusion accuracy combining two commercial instruments, a neuronavigation system and a ultrasound system.
Schlaier JR; Warnat J; Dorenbeck U; Proescholdt M; Schebesch KM; Brawanski A
Acta Neurochir (Wien); 2004 Mar; 146(3):271-6; discussion 276-7. PubMed ID: 15015050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Registration of intraoperative 3D ultrasound with preoperative MRI data for computer-assisted orthopaedic surgery].
Winter S; Dekomien C; Hensel K; Hold S; Schmitz G; Teske W
Z Orthop Unfall; 2007; 145(5):586-90. PubMed ID: 17939068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Improved methods for image registration.
Alpert NM; Berdichevsky D; Levin Z; Morris ED; Fischman AJ
Neuroimage; 1996 Feb; 3(1):10-8. PubMed ID: 9345471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Prospective registration of human head magnetic resonance images for reproducible slice positioning using localizer images.
Gedat E; Braun J; Sack I; Bernarding J
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2004 Oct; 20(4):581-7. PubMed ID: 15390147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of extended field of view and dual image ultrasound techniques: accuracy and reliability of distance measurements in phantom study.
Ying M; Sin MH
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2005 Jan; 31(1):79-83. PubMed ID: 15653233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Development of a platform for co-registered ultrasound and MR contrast imaging in vivo.
Chandrana C; Bevan P; Hudson J; Pang I; Burns P; Plewes D; Chopra R
Phys Med Biol; 2011 Feb; 56(3):861-77. PubMed ID: 21242630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Registration of functional and anatomical MRI: accuracy assessment and application in navigated neurosurgery.
Rohlfing T; West JB; Beier J; Liebig T; Taschner CA; Thomale UW
Comput Aided Surg; 2000; 5(6):414-25. PubMed ID: 11295854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [MR-based volumetric analysis of small tumor volumes: accuracy of phantom examinations of simulated eye tumors].
Lemke AJ; Kazi I; Hosten N; Bechrakis NE; Foerster MH; Felix R
Rofo; 2003 Jul; 175(7):958-62. PubMed ID: 12847651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Magnetic resonance image registration in multiple sclerosis: comparison with repositioning error and observer-based variability.
Tan IL; van Schijndel RA; van Walderveen MA; Quist M; Bos R; Pouwels PJ; Desmedt P; Adèr HJ; Barkhof F
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2002 May; 15(5):505-10. PubMed ID: 11997890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
