115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20518901)
1. Evaluation of CD56 and CD57 immunostainings for discrimination between endocrine ductal carcinoma in situ and intraductal papilloma.
Tajima S; Maeda I; Kanemaki Y; Nakajima Y; Tatsunami S; Fukuda M; Takagi M
Pathol Int; 2010 Jun; 60(6):459-65. PubMed ID: 20518901
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Combined evaluation of CK5/6, ER, p63, and MUC3 for distinguishing breast intraductal papilloma from ductal carcinoma in situ.
Furuya C; Kawano H; Yamanouchi T; Oga A; Ueda J; Takahashi M
Pathol Int; 2012 Jun; 62(6):381-90. PubMed ID: 22612506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Solid papillary ductal carcinoma in situ versus usual ductal hyperplasia in the breast: a potentially difficult distinction resolved by cytokeratin 5/6.
Rabban JT; Koerner FC; Lerwill MF
Hum Pathol; 2006 Jul; 37(7):787-93. PubMed ID: 16784976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Clinicopathologic study of breast cancer with features of endocrine ductal carcinoma-in-situ].
Yang WT; Xu YX; Zhang TQ
Zhonghua Bing Li Xue Za Zhi; 2006 Oct; 35(10):594-7. PubMed ID: 17134566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Concomitant expression of epithelial-mesenchymal transition biomarkers in breast ductal carcinoma: association with progression.
Logullo AF; Nonogaki S; Pasini FS; Osório CA; Soares FA; Brentani MM
Oncol Rep; 2010 Feb; 23(2):313-20. PubMed ID: 20043090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Ductal carcinoma in situ with spindle cells: a potential diagnostic pitfall in the evaluation of breast lesions.
Tan PH; Lui GG; Chiang G; Yap WM; Poh WT; Bay BH
Histopathology; 2004 Oct; 45(4):343-51. PubMed ID: 15469472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Is CD56 a specific and reliable neuroendocrine marker for discriminating between endocrine/neuroendocrine ductal carcinoma in situ and intraductal papilloma of the breast?
Kawasaki T; Kondo T; Nakazawa T; Mochizuki K; Yamane T; Murata S; Inoue S; Tsunoda H; Katoh R
Pathol Int; 2011 Jan; 61(1):49-51. PubMed ID: 21166944
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. A useful immunohistochemical approach to evaluate intraductal proliferative lesions of the breast and to predict their prognosis.
Omi Y; Yamamoto T; Okamoto T; Obara T; Kobayashi M
Histol Histopathol; 2011 Jan; 26(1):79-86. PubMed ID: 21117029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Carcinoma in situ of the female breast. A clinico-pathological, immunohistological, and DNA ploidy study.
Ottesen GL
APMIS Suppl; 2003; (108):1-67. PubMed ID: 12874968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. CD24 expression in ductal carcinoma in situ and invasive ductal carcinoma of breast: an immunohistochemistry-based pilot study.
Bircan S; Kapucuoglu N; Baspinar S; Inan G; Candir O
Pathol Res Pract; 2006; 202(8):569-76. PubMed ID: 16828238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Nipple aspirate fluid cytology in breast carcinoma.
Krishnamurthy S; Sneige N; Thompson PA; Marcy SM; Singletary SE; Cristofanilli M; Hunt KK; Kuerer HM
Cancer; 2003 Apr; 99(2):97-104. PubMed ID: 12704689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Immunocytochemical analysis of p63 and 34βE12 in fine needle aspiration cytology specimens for breast lesions: a potentially useful discriminatory marker between intraductal papilloma and ductal carcinoma in situ.
Hoshikawa S; Sano T; Hirato J; Oyama T; Fukuda T
Cytopathology; 2016 Apr; 27(2):108-14. PubMed ID: 25810244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Analysis of the progression of intraductal proliferative lesions in the breast by PCR-based clonal assay.
Yu Q; Niu Y; Yu Y; Ding X; Shi Y
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2009 Apr; 114(3):433-40. PubMed ID: 18425676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. HER2 status in pure ductal carcinoma in situ and in the intraductal and invasive components of invasive ductal carcinoma determined by fluorescence in situ hybridization and immunohistochemistry.
Park K; Han S; Kim HJ; Kim J; Shin E
Histopathology; 2006 May; 48(6):702-7. PubMed ID: 16681686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Expression of cytokeratin markers, ER-alpha, PR, HER-2/neu, and EGFR in pure ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) and DCIS with co-existing invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC) of the breast.
Steinman S; Wang J; Bourne P; Yang Q; Tang P
Ann Clin Lab Sci; 2007; 37(2):127-34. PubMed ID: 17522367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Ductal carcinoma in situ in core biopsies containing invasive breast cancer: correlation with extensive intraductal component and lumpectomy margins.
Dzierzanowski M; Melville KA; Barnes PJ; MacIntosh RF; Caines JS; Porter GA
J Surg Oncol; 2005 May; 90(2):71-6. PubMed ID: 15844190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Usefulness of immunohistochemistry for differential diagnosis between benign and malignant breast lesions.
Moriya T; Kanomata N; Kozuka Y; Fukumoto M; Iwachido N; Hata S; Takahashi Y; Miura H; Ishida K; Watanabe M
Breast Cancer; 2009; 16(3):173-8. PubMed ID: 19475479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Ductoscopy and intraductal vacuum assisted biopsy in women with pathologic nipple discharge.
Hünerbein M; Raubach M; Gebauer B; Schneider W; Schlag PM
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2006 Oct; 99(3):301-7. PubMed ID: 16752074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Estrogen receptor alpha and beta, progesterone receptor, pS2 and HER-2/neu expression delineate different subgroups in ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast.
Rody A; Diallo R; Poremba C; Speich R; Wuelfing P; Kissler S; Solbach C; Kiesel L; Jackisch C
Oncol Rep; 2004 Oct; 12(4):695-9. PubMed ID: 15375487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Breast carcinoma in situ in 167 women--incidence, mode of presentation, therapy and follow-up.
Ringberg A; Andersson I; Aspegren K; Linell F
Eur J Surg Oncol; 1991 Oct; 17(5):466-76. PubMed ID: 1657650
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
