These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
693 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20518928)
1. SEM evaluation of root canal debridement with Sonicare CanalBrush irrigation. Salman MI; Baumann MA; Hellmich M; Roggendorf MJ; Termaat S Int Endod J; 2010 May; 43(5):363-9. PubMed ID: 20518928 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effectiveness of different final irrigant activation protocols on smear layer removal in curved canals. Caron G; Nham K; Bronnec F; Machtou P J Endod; 2010 Aug; 36(8):1361-6. PubMed ID: 20647097 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The effect of application time of EDTA and NaOCl on intracanal smear layer removal: an SEM analysis. Teixeira CS; Felippe MC; Felippe WT Int Endod J; 2005 May; 38(5):285-90. PubMed ID: 15876291 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. SEM evaluation of canal wall dentine following use of Mtwo and ProTaper NiTi rotary instruments. Foschi F; Nucci C; Montebugnoli L; Marchionni S; Breschi L; Malagnino VA; Prati C Int Endod J; 2004 Dec; 37(12):832-9. PubMed ID: 15548274 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A comparative scanning electron microscopic investigation of the smear layer after the use of sodium hypochlorite gel and solution forms as root canal irrigants. Zand V; Lotfi M; Rahimi S; Mokhtari H; Kazemi A; Sakhamanesh V J Endod; 2010 Jul; 36(7):1234-7. PubMed ID: 20630306 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effectiveness of ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) and MTAD on debris and smear layer removal using a self-adjusting file. Adigüzel O; Yiğit-Özer S; Kaya S; Uysal İ; Ganidağli-Ayaz S; Akkuş Z Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2011 Dec; 112(6):803-8. PubMed ID: 21873086 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The self-adjusting file (SAF). Part 3: removal of debris and smear layer-A scanning electron microscope study. Metzger Z; Teperovich E; Cohen R; Zary R; Paqué F; Hülsmann M J Endod; 2010 Apr; 36(4):697-702. PubMed ID: 20307746 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Root canal debridement efficacy of different final irrigation protocols. Al-Ali M; Sathorn C; Parashos P Int Endod J; 2012 Oct; 45(10):898-906. PubMed ID: 22486845 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Scanning electron microscopic evaluation of debris and smear layer remaining following use of ProTaper and Hero Shaper instruments in combination with NaOCl and EDTA irrigation. Yang G; Wu H; Zheng Y; Zhang H; Li H; Zhou X Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2008 Oct; 106(4):e63-71. PubMed ID: 18701325 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of radicular dentin erosion and smear layer removal capacity of Self-Adjusting File using different concentrations of sodium hypochlorite as an initial irrigant. Kaya S; Yiğit-Özer S; Adigüzel Ö Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2011 Oct; 112(4):524-30. PubMed ID: 21664155 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Root canal debris removal using different irrigating needles: an SEM study. Ghivari S; Kubasad G Indian J Dent Res; 2011; 22(5):659-63. PubMed ID: 22406709 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of the efficacy of Smear Clear with and without a canal brush in smear layer and debris removal from instrumented root canal using WaveOne versus ProTaper: a scanning electron microscopic study. Kamel WH; Kataia EM J Endod; 2014 Mar; 40(3):446-50. PubMed ID: 24565669 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. An ex vivo evaluation of a new root canal irrigation technique with intracanal aspiration. Fukumoto Y; Kikuchi I; Yoshioka T; Kobayashi C; Suda H Int Endod J; 2006 Feb; 39(2):93-9. PubMed ID: 16454788 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A scanning electron microscopic evaluation of root canal wall cleanliness after calcium hydroxide removal using three irrigation regimens. Naaman A; Kaloustian H; Ounsi HF; Naaman-Bou Abboud N; Ricci C; Medioni E J Contemp Dent Pract; 2007 Jan; 8(1):11-8. PubMed ID: 17211500 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effect of a low-concentration EDTA solution on root canal walls: a scanning electron microscopic study. Perez F; Rouqueyrol-Pourcel N Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2005 Mar; 99(3):383-7. PubMed ID: 15716850 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The influence of volume, type of irrigant and flushing method on removing artificially placed dentine debris from the apical root canal during passive ultrasonic irrigation. van der Sluis LW; Gambarini G; Wu MK; Wesselink PR Int Endod J; 2006 Jun; 39(6):472-6. PubMed ID: 16674742 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of smear layer removal after use of a canal brush: an SEM study. Garip Y; Sazak H; Gunday M; Hatipoglu S Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2010 Aug; 110(2):e62-6. PubMed ID: 20573530 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Smear layer removal and canal cleanliness using different irrigation systems (EndoActivator, EndoVac, and passive ultrasonic irrigation): field emission scanning electron microscopic evaluation in an in vitro study. Mancini M; Cerroni L; Iorio L; Armellin E; Conte G; Cianconi L J Endod; 2013 Nov; 39(11):1456-60. PubMed ID: 24139274 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A scanning electron microscopic study of debris and smear layer remaining following use of AET instruments and K-flexofiles. Drukteinis S; Balciuniene I Stomatologija; 2006; 8(3):70-5. PubMed ID: 17191061 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of the efficacy of maleic acid and ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid in smear layer removal from instrumented human root canal: a scanning electron microscopic study. Ballal NV; Kandian S; Mala K; Bhat KS; Acharya S J Endod; 2009 Nov; 35(11):1573-6. PubMed ID: 19840650 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]