These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

91 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2052080)

  • 1. Conflict in NIH panel.
    Nature; 1991 Jun; 351(6328):598. PubMed ID: 2052080
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Scientific misconduct. NIH: Imanishi-Kari guilty.
    Anderson C
    Nature; 1991 Mar; 350(6316):262-3. PubMed ID: 2008203
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. US realigns misconduct offices at NIH.
    Anderson C
    Nature; 1992 Jun; 357(6378):431. PubMed ID: 1319001
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. NIH takes Stewart and Feder off the misconduct beat.
    Mervis J
    Nature; 1993 Apr; 362(6422):686. PubMed ID: 8469274
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Warm praise for a whistle-blower.
    Science; 1991 Mar; 251(5001):1552. PubMed ID: 2011730
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Popovic says OSI is wrong.
    Popovic M
    Nature; 1992 Aug; 358(6387):533. PubMed ID: 1501706
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. NIH change procedures for monitoring scientific misconduct.
    Palca J
    Nature; 1989 Feb; 337(6208):588. PubMed ID: 2918889
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. NIH office plans research on misconduct.
    Dalton R
    Nature; 1999 Jul; 400(6740):99. PubMed ID: 10408427
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Science and scandal: what can be done about scientific misconduct?
    Robinson A
    CMAJ; 1994 Sep; 151(6):831-4. PubMed ID: 8087757
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Inquiry into misconduct excoriates Michigan State.
    Maddox J
    Nature; 1993 Jan; 361(6410):287. PubMed ID: 8426641
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Court rules for NIH.
    Science; 1992 May; 256(5060):1137. PubMed ID: 1589790
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. NIH publish new rules.
    Anderson C
    Nature; 1991 Jun; 351(6328):595. PubMed ID: 2052078
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. US drops Imanishi-Kari investigation; Baltimore withdraws Cell retraction.
    Anderson C; Watson T
    Nature; 1992 Jul; 358(6383):177. PubMed ID: 1630478
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A new web resource for NIH immunology.
    Siegel RM
    Nat Immunol; 2006 Oct; 7(10):1007. PubMed ID: 16985492
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Dissent on forensic evidence.
    McDevitt HO; Storb U
    Nature; 1991 Jul; 352(6332):184. PubMed ID: 1857406
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Scientific publishing. Congress puts similar heat on NIH.
    Kaiser J
    Science; 2004 Jul; 305(5683):458. PubMed ID: 15273365
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. NIH laboratory admits to fabricated embryo research, retracts paper.
    Anderson C
    Nature; 1992 Jun; 357(6378):427. PubMed ID: 1608434
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Scientific publishing. NIH proposes 6-month public access to papers.
    Kaiser J
    Science; 2004 Sep; 305(5690):1548. PubMed ID: 15361594
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Scientific misconduct in academia: a survey and analysis of applicable law.
    Sise CB
    San Diego Law Rev; 1991; 28(2):401-28. PubMed ID: 11651628
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Federal panel endorses Baylor fraud claim.
    Dalton R
    Nature; 1999 Feb; 397(6720):549. PubMed ID: 10050835
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.