BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

568 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20521859)

  • 1. Sound processing hierarchy within human auditory cortex.
    Okamoto H; Stracke H; Bermudez P; Pantev C
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2011 Aug; 23(8):1855-63. PubMed ID: 20521859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Bottom-up driven involuntary auditory evoked field change: constant sound sequencing amplifies but does not sharpen neural activity.
    Okamoto H; Stracke H; Lagemann L; Pantev C
    J Neurophysiol; 2010 Jan; 103(1):244-9. PubMed ID: 19889852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Neural interactions within and beyond the critical band elicited by two simultaneously presented narrow band noises: a magnetoencephalographic study.
    Okamoto H; Stracke H; Pantev C
    Neuroscience; 2008 Feb; 151(3):913-20. PubMed ID: 18191899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Top-down modulation of auditory processing: effects of sound context, musical expertise and attentional focus.
    Tervaniemi M; Kruck S; De Baene W; Schröger E; Alter K; Friederici AD
    Eur J Neurosci; 2009 Oct; 30(8):1636-42. PubMed ID: 19821835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Responsiveness of the human auditory cortex to degraded speech sounds: reduction of amplitude resolution vs. additive noise.
    Miettinen I; Alku P; Salminen N; May PJ; Tiitinen H
    Brain Res; 2011 Jan; 1367():298-309. PubMed ID: 20969833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The dependence of the auditory evoked N1m decrement on the bandwidth of preceding notch-filtered noise.
    Okamoto H; Kakigi R; Gunji A; Kubo T; Pantev C
    Eur J Neurosci; 2005 Apr; 21(7):1957-61. PubMed ID: 15869488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effects of center frequency on binaural auditory filter bandwidth in the human brain.
    Soeta Y; Shimokura R; Nakagawa S
    Neuroreport; 2008 Nov; 19(17):1709-13. PubMed ID: 18841088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Enhancement of auditory-evoked potentials in musicians reflects an influence of expertise but not selective attention.
    Baumann S; Meyer M; Jäncke L
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2008 Dec; 20(12):2238-49. PubMed ID: 18457513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Neuromagnetic recordings reveal the temporal dynamics of auditory spatial processing in the human cortex.
    Tiitinen H; Salminen NH; Palomäki KJ; Mäkinen VT; Alku P; May PJ
    Neurosci Lett; 2006 Mar; 396(1):17-22. PubMed ID: 16343772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Neural generators underlying concurrent sound segregation.
    Arnott SR; Bardouille T; Ross B; Alain C
    Brain Res; 2011 Apr; 1387():116-24. PubMed ID: 21362407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Breaking the wave: effects of attention and learning on concurrent sound perception.
    Alain C
    Hear Res; 2007 Jul; 229(1-2):225-36. PubMed ID: 17303355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Neuromagnetic evaluation of binaural unmasking.
    Sasaki T; Kawase T; Nakasato N; Kanno A; Ogura M; Tominaga T; Kobayashi T
    Neuroimage; 2005 Apr; 25(3):684-9. PubMed ID: 15808969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Right hemispheric laterality of human 40 Hz auditory steady-state responses.
    Ross B; Herdman AT; Pantev C
    Cereb Cortex; 2005 Dec; 15(12):2029-39. PubMed ID: 15772375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of the binaural auditory filter in the human brain.
    Soeta Y; Nakagawa S
    Neuroreport; 2007 Dec; 18(18):1939-43. PubMed ID: 18007191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Auditory cortex responses to the transition from monophonic to pseudo-stereo sound.
    Ross B; Herdman AT; Wollbrink A; Pantev C
    Neurol Clin Neurophysiol; 2004 Nov; 2004():18. PubMed ID: 16012692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Functional asymmetry in primary auditory cortex for processing musical sounds: temporal pattern analysis of fMRI time series.
    Izumi S; Itoh K; Matsuzawa H; Takahashi S; Kwee IL; Nakada T
    Neuroreport; 2011 Jul; 22(10):470-3. PubMed ID: 21642880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Endogenous auditory spatial attention modulates obligatory sensory activity in auditory cortex.
    Power AJ; Lalor EC; Reilly RB
    Cereb Cortex; 2011 Jun; 21(6):1223-30. PubMed ID: 21068187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Time course and hemispheric lateralization effects of complex pitch processing: evoked magnetic fields in response to rippled noise stimuli.
    Hertrich I; Mathiak K; Lutzenberger W; Ackermann H
    Neuropsychologia; 2004; 42(13):1814-26. PubMed ID: 15351630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Hemispheric asymmetry of auditory evoked fields elicited by spectral versus temporal stimulus change.
    Okamoto H; Stracke H; Draganova R; Pantev C
    Cereb Cortex; 2009 Oct; 19(10):2290-7. PubMed ID: 19136454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Distraction task rather than focal attention modulates gamma activity associated with auditory steady-state responses (ASSRs).
    Griskova-Bulanova I; Ruksenas O; Dapsys K; Maciulis V; Arnfred SM
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2011 Aug; 122(8):1541-8. PubMed ID: 21377412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 29.