These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

109 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2052282)

  • 1. Reliability of the Vistech Contrast Test System in a life-span adult sample.
    Scialfa CT; Adams EM; Giovanetto M
    Optom Vis Sci; 1991 Apr; 68(4):270-4. PubMed ID: 2052282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of the VCTS-6500 and the CSV-1000 tests for visual contrast sensitivity testing.
    Franco S; Silva AC; Carvalho AS; Macedo AS; Lira M
    Neurotoxicology; 2010 Dec; 31(6):758-61. PubMed ID: 20600292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Vistech VCTS 6500 charts--within- and between-session reliability.
    Reeves BC; Wood JM; Hill AR
    Optom Vis Sci; 1991 Sep; 68(9):728-37. PubMed ID: 1745500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Normative contrast sensitivity data for young children.
    Scharre JE; Cotter SA; Block SS; Kelly SA
    Optom Vis Sci; 1990 Nov; 67(11):826-32. PubMed ID: 2250891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Assessment of the Vistech contrast sensitivity test for repeated-measures applications.
    Kennedy RS; Dunlap WP
    Optom Vis Sci; 1990 Apr; 67(4):248-51. PubMed ID: 2342786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Correlation between contrast sensitivity and visual acuity in retinitis pigmentosa patients.
    Akeo K; Hiida Y; Saga M; Inoue R; Oguchi Y
    Ophthalmologica; 2002; 216(3):185-91. PubMed ID: 12065855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Assessment of cycloplegic effects on the vistech contrast sensitivity test in Army aviator candidates.
    Bachman WG; Egenmaier W
    Optom Vis Sci; 1991 Jun; 68(6):452-5. PubMed ID: 1891196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The usefulness of Vistech and FACT contrast sensitivity charts for cataract and refractive surgery outcomes research.
    Pesudovs K; Hazel CA; Doran RM; Elliott DB
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2004 Jan; 88(1):11-6. PubMed ID: 14693761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Age differences in Vistech near contrast sensitivity.
    Scialfa CT; Tyrrell RA; Garvey PM; Deering LM; Leibowitz HW; Goebel CC
    Am J Optom Physiol Opt; 1988 Dec; 65(12):951-6. PubMed ID: 3066222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Contrast sensitivity in 24- and 36-month-olds as assessed with the contrast sensitivity card procedure.
    Adams RJ; Courage ML
    Optom Vis Sci; 1993 Feb; 70(2):97-101. PubMed ID: 8446383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Reliabilities of alternate measures of contrast sensitivity functions.
    Long GM; Tuck JP
    Am J Optom Physiol Opt; 1988 Jan; 65(1):37-48. PubMed ID: 3348349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Visual performance of subjects wearing presbyopic contact lenses.
    Rajagopalan AS; Bennett ES; Lakshminarayanan V
    Optom Vis Sci; 2006 Aug; 83(8):611-5. PubMed ID: 16909087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Age-related change in contrast sensitivity among Japanese adults.
    Nomura H; Ando F; Niino N; Shimokata H; Miyake Y
    Jpn J Ophthalmol; 2003; 47(3):299-303. PubMed ID: 12782168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Clinical contrast sensitivity chart evaluation.
    Elliott DB; Whitaker D
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1992 Jul; 12(3):275-80. PubMed ID: 1454362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Accuracy of the contrast sensitivity card test for infants: retest variability and prediction of spatial resolution.
    Drover JR; Courage ML; Dalton SM; Adams RJ
    Optom Vis Sci; 2006 Apr; 83(4):228-32. PubMed ID: 16614578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A comparison of three clinical methods of spatial contrast-sensitivity testing in normal subjects.
    Tweten S; Wall M; Schwartz BD
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 1990; 228(1):24-7. PubMed ID: 2311941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Predicting individual contrast sensitivity functions from acuity and letter contrast sensitivity measurements.
    Thurman SM; Davey PG; McCray KL; Paronian V; Seitz AR
    J Vis; 2016 Dec; 16(15):15. PubMed ID: 28006065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Contrast sensitivity norms for the Mentor B-VAT II-SG video acuity tester.
    Corwin TR; Carlson NB; Berger E
    Optom Vis Sci; 1989 Dec; 66(12):864-70. PubMed ID: 2626254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The effect of neodymium: YAG capsulotomy on contrast sensitivity and the evaluation of methods for its assessment.
    Tan JC; Spalton DJ; Arden GB
    Ophthalmology; 1999 Apr; 106(4):703-9. PubMed ID: 10201590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Visual contrast sensitivity testing: a comparison of two F.A.C.T. test types.
    Hitchcock EM; Dick RB; Krieg EF
    Neurotoxicol Teratol; 2004; 26(2):271-7. PubMed ID: 15019960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.