These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

220 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20522895)

  • 21. Power and sample size when multiple endpoints are considered.
    Senn S; Bretz F
    Pharm Stat; 2007; 6(3):161-70. PubMed ID: 17674404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Efficient experimental design for binary matched pairs data.
    Lennox KP; Sherman M
    Stat Med; 2009 Oct; 28(24):2952-66. PubMed ID: 19691023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Quantile-function based null distribution in resampling based multiple testing.
    van der Laan MJ; Hubbard AE
    Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol; 2006; 5():Article14. PubMed ID: 17049025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Issues in designing flexible trials.
    Posch M; Bauer P; Brannath W
    Stat Med; 2003 Mar; 22(6):953-69. PubMed ID: 12627412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Explorations in statistics: the analysis of ratios and normalized data.
    Curran-Everett D
    Adv Physiol Educ; 2013 Sep; 37(3):213-9. PubMed ID: 24022766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. How often is prep close to the true replication probability?
    Trafimow D; MacDonald JA; Rice S; Clason DL
    Psychol Methods; 2010 Sep; 15(3):300-7. PubMed ID: 20822254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Explorations in statistics: the assumption of normality.
    Curran-Everett D
    Adv Physiol Educ; 2017 Sep; 41(3):449-453. PubMed ID: 28743689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. How well do multiple testing methods scale up when both n and k increase?
    Westfall PH; Manage A
    J Biopharm Stat; 2011 Jul; 21(4):583-94. PubMed ID: 21516558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. [Comparison of two or more samples of quantitative data].
    Ivanković D; Tiljak MK
    Acta Med Croatica; 2006; 60 Suppl 1():37-46. PubMed ID: 16526306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. A comparison of model choices for the Continual Reassessment Method in phase I cancer trials.
    Paoletti X; Kramar A
    Stat Med; 2009 Oct; 28(24):3012-28. PubMed ID: 19672839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The geography of power: statistical performance of tests of clusters and clustering in heterogeneous populations.
    Waller LA; Hill EG; Rudd RA
    Stat Med; 2006 Mar; 25(5):853-65. PubMed ID: 16453372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. [How to assess the size of a clinical trial?].
    Paesmans M
    Rev Mal Respir; 1994; 11(6):547-57. PubMed ID: 7831504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Statistical power and estimation of the number of required subjects for a study based on the t-test: a surgeon's primer.
    Livingston EH; Cassidy L
    J Surg Res; 2005 Jun; 126(2):149-59. PubMed ID: 15919413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Adaptive design and estimation in randomized clinical trials with correlated observations.
    Yin G; Shen Y
    Biometrics; 2005 Jun; 61(2):362-9. PubMed ID: 16011682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. A general approach for sample size and power calculations based on the Haseman-Elston method.
    Hädicke O; Pahlke F; Ziegler A
    Biom J; 2008 Apr; 50(2):257-69. PubMed ID: 18383449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Optimal conditional error functions for the control of conditional power.
    Brannath W; Bauer P
    Biometrics; 2004 Sep; 60(3):715-23. PubMed ID: 15339294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Score tests for exploring complex models: application to HIV dynamics models.
    Drylewicz J; Commenges D; Thiébaut R
    Biom J; 2010 Feb; 52(1):10-21. PubMed ID: 19937998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Inappropriate use of statistical power.
    Fraser RA
    Bone Marrow Transplant; 2023 May; 58(5):474-477. PubMed ID: 36869191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Test statistics and sample size formulae for comparative binomial trials with null hypothesis of non-zero risk difference or non-unity relative risk by C. P. Farrington and G. Manning, Statistics in Medicine 1990; 9: 1447-1454.
    Schoder V; Pichlmeier U; Berger J
    Stat Med; 2002 Jul; 21(13):1958-60; author reply 1960. PubMed ID: 12111901
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. A test for psychometric function shift.
    Logvinenko AD; Tyurin YN; Sawey M
    Behav Res Methods; 2012 Jun; 44(2):503-15. PubMed ID: 22083658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.