BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2052340)

  • 1. Errors generated with the use of rectangular collimation.
    Parks ET
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1991 Apr; 71(4):509-13. PubMed ID: 2052340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A comparison of rectangular and cylindrical collimation for intraoral radiographs.
    Horton PS; Sippy FH; Nelson JF; Kohout FJ; Kienzle GC
    J Dent Educ; 1983 Dec; 47(12):771-3. PubMed ID: 6582105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluating cone cut in rectangular collimation in intraoral radiography: application of ALADA and radiation stewardship.
    Clark-Perry D; Berkhout WER; Sanderink GC; Slot DE
    Clin Oral Investig; 2023 Sep; 27(9):5391-5402. PubMed ID: 37537518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of technical errors in pediatric bitewing radiographs acquired with round vs rectangular collimation.
    Campbell RE; Anderson D; Strauss K; Brown C; Fenchel M; Wilson S; Scarfe W
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2022 Mar; 133(3):333-342. PubMed ID: 34627711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A comparison between bitewing radiographs taken with rectangular and circular collimators in UK military dental practices: a retrospective study.
    Parrott LA; Ng SY
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2011 Feb; 40(2):102-9. PubMed ID: 21239573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Intraoral radiographic errors.
    Patel JR
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1979 Nov; 48(5):479-83. PubMed ID: 290948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A Comparison of Technique Errors using Two Radiographic Intra-oral Receptor-holding Devices.
    Mauriello SM; Tang Q; Johnson KB; Hadgraft HH; Platin E
    J Dent Hyg; 2015 Dec; 89(6):384-9. PubMed ID: 26684996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of the efficacy and technical accuracy of different rectangular collimators for intraoral radiography.
    Zhang W; Abramovitch K; Thames W; Leon IL; Colosi DC; Goren AD
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2009 Jul; 108(1):e22-8. PubMed ID: 19464209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. In vivo determination of radiographic projection errors produced by a novel filmholder and an x-ray beam manipulator.
    Zappa U; Simona C; Graf H; van Aken J
    J Periodontol; 1991 Nov; 62(11):674-83. PubMed ID: 1753320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Thyroid dose distribution in dental radiography.
    Bristow RG; Wood RE; Clark GM
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1989 Oct; 68(4):482-7. PubMed ID: 2797745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Digital intraoral imaging: analysis of retakes and reduction in radiation exposure using rectangular collimation.
    Vijayan S; Shah N; Potluri A
    Gen Dent; 2022; 70(6):66-70. PubMed ID: 36288078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The influence of image quality on radiographic diagnosis of approximal caries.
    Svenson B
    Swed Dent J Suppl; 1991; 74():1-62. PubMed ID: 2035145
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Kerma area product (KAP) and scatter measurements for intraoral X-ray machines using three different types of round collimation compared with rectangular beam limiter.
    Magill D; Ngo NJH; Felice MA; Mupparapu M
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2019 Feb; 48(2):20180183. PubMed ID: 30346798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Patient risk related to common dental radiographic examinations: the impact of 2007 International Commission on Radiological Protection recommendations regarding dose calculation.
    Ludlow JB; Davies-Ludlow LE; White SC
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2008 Sep; 139(9):1237-43. PubMed ID: 18762634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of filtration, collimation, and target-receptor distance on artificial approximal enamel lesion detection with the use of RadioVisioGraphy.
    Parks ET; Miles DA; Van Dis ML; Williamson GF; Razmus TF; Bricker SL
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1994 Apr; 77(4):419-26. PubMed ID: 8015809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Radiation doses of commonly used dental radiographic surveys.
    Freeman JP; Brand JW
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1994 Mar; 77(3):285-9. PubMed ID: 8170662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Errors on dental bitewing radiographs.
    Nysether S; Hansen BF
    Community Dent Oral Epidemiol; 1983 Oct; 11(5):286-8. PubMed ID: 6578896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Radiation dosage of a dental imaging system.
    Soh G; Loh FC; Chong YH
    Quintessence Int; 1993 Mar; 24(3):189-91. PubMed ID: 8511278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Direct digital radiography in the dental office.
    Wenzel A; Gröndahl HG
    Int Dent J; 1995 Feb; 45(1):27-34. PubMed ID: 7607741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of two film holders for periapical radiography performed by dental students.
    Choksi SK; Rao MS
    MSDA J; 1996; 39(1):23-6. PubMed ID: 9569872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.