These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20523852)
1. Designing informative warning signals: Effects of indicator type, modality, and task demand on recognition speed and accuracy. Stevens CJ; Brennan D; Petocz A; Howell C Adv Cogn Psychol; 2009 May; 5():84-90. PubMed ID: 20523852 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cough once for danger: icons versus abstract warnings as informative alerts in civil aviation. Perry NC; Stevens CJ; Wiggins MW; Howell CE Hum Factors; 2007 Dec; 49(6):1061-71. PubMed ID: 18074705 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Auditory warnings, signal-referent relations, and natural indicators: re-thinking theory and application. Petocz A; Keller PE; Stevens CJ J Exp Psychol Appl; 2008 Jun; 14(2):165-78. PubMed ID: 18590372 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The Impact of Different Types of Auditory Warnings on Working Memory. Lei Z; Ma S; Li H; Yang Z Front Psychol; 2022; 13():780657. PubMed ID: 35282225 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Toward a Better Understanding of In-Vehicle Auditory Warnings and Background Noise. Šabić E; Chen J; MacDonald JA Hum Factors; 2021 Mar; 63(2):312-335. PubMed ID: 31593500 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The modality shift effect and the effectiveness of warning signals in different modalities. Rodway P Acta Psychol (Amst); 2005 Oct; 120(2):199-226. PubMed ID: 15993828 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Are the warning icons more attentional? Tao J; Yafeng N; Lei Z Appl Ergon; 2017 Nov; 65():51-60. PubMed ID: 28802460 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Learning and retention of associations between auditory icons and denotative referents: implications for the design of auditory warnings. Stephan KL; Smith SE; Martin RL; Parker SP; McAnally KI Hum Factors; 2006; 48(2):288-99. PubMed ID: 16884050 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Augmented reality warnings in vehicles: Effects of modality and specificity on effectiveness. Schwarz F; Fastenmeier W Accid Anal Prev; 2017 Apr; 101():55-66. PubMed ID: 28189059 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Decrements in performance on a primary task associated with the reaction to voice warning messages. Wheale J Br J Audiol; 1982 Nov; 16(4):265-72. PubMed ID: 6218850 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Looming auditory collision warnings for driving. Gray R Hum Factors; 2011 Feb; 53(1):63-74. PubMed ID: 21469534 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Use of auditory icons as emergency warnings: evaluation within a vehicle collision avoidance application. Graham R Ergonomics; 1999 Sep; 42(9):1233-48. PubMed ID: 10503056 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A new class of auditory warning signals for complex systems: auditory icons. Belz SM; Robinson GS; Casali JG Hum Factors; 1999 Dec; 41(4):608-18. PubMed ID: 10774131 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A comparison of tactile, visual, and auditory warnings for rear-end collision prevention in simulated driving. Scott JJ; Gray R Hum Factors; 2008 Apr; 50(2):264-75. PubMed ID: 18516837 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Mapping candidate within-vehicle auditory displays to their referents. McKeown D; Isherwood S Hum Factors; 2007 Jun; 49(3):417-28. PubMed ID: 17552306 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A psychophysiological evaluation of the perceived urgency of auditory warning signals. Burt JL; Bartolome DS; Burdette DW; Comstock JR Ergonomics; 1995 Nov; 38(11):2327-40. PubMed ID: 7498191 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The speed of response to synthesized voice messages. Wheale JL Br J Audiol; 1981 Aug; 15(3):205-12. PubMed ID: 6170372 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Supporting interruption management and multimodal interface design: three meta-analyses of task performance as a function of interrupting task modality. Lu SA; Wickens CD; Prinet JC; Hutchins SD; Sarter N; Sebok A Hum Factors; 2013 Aug; 55(4):697-724. PubMed ID: 23964412 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effectiveness of auditory and tactile crossmodal cues in a dual-task visual and auditory scenario. Hopkins K; Kass SJ; Blalock LD; Brill JC Ergonomics; 2017 May; 60(5):692-700. PubMed ID: 27267493 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]