These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20524753)

  • 21. Spatiotemporal Complexity of the Aortic Sinus Vortex as a Function of Leaflet Calcification.
    Hatoum H; Dasi LP
    Ann Biomed Eng; 2019 Apr; 47(4):1116-1128. PubMed ID: 30710186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Analytical modeling of the instantaneous maximal transvalvular pressure gradient in aortic stenosis.
    Garcia D; Kadem L; Savéry D; Pibarot P; Durand LG
    J Biomech; 2006; 39(16):3036-44. PubMed ID: 16307750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Kangaroo versus freestyle stentless bioprostheses in a juvenile sheep model: hemodynamic performance and calcification behavior.
    Neethling WM; Hodge AJ; Glancy R
    J Card Surg; 2005; 20(1):29-34. PubMed ID: 15673407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Intraoperative determination of the aortic valve area (Gorlin) by flowmetry.
    Larmi TK; Kärkölä P; Kairaluoma MI; Tuononen S; Nuutinen L; Takkunen J
    Ann Chir Gynaecol; 1977; 66(2):87-9. PubMed ID: 869483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Fluid structure interaction modelling of aortic valve stenosis: Effects of valve calcification on coronary artery flow and aortic root hemodynamics.
    Kivi AR; Sedaghatizadeh N; Cazzolato BS; Zander AC; Roberts-Thomson R; Nelson AJ; Arjomandi M
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2020 Nov; 196():105647. PubMed ID: 32688138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Direct numerical simulation of a 2D-stented aortic heart valve at physiological flow rates.
    Dimakopoulos Y; Bogaerds AC; Anderson PD; Hulsen MA; Baaijens FP
    Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2012; 15(11):1157-79. PubMed ID: 22185614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. An approach to the simulation of fluid-structure interaction in the aortic valve.
    Carmody CJ; Burriesci G; Howard IC; Patterson EA
    J Biomech; 2006; 39(1):158-69. PubMed ID: 16271600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The hemodynamics of the Berlin pulsatile VAD and the role of its MHV configuration.
    Avrahami I; Rosenfeld M; Einav S
    Ann Biomed Eng; 2006 Sep; 34(9):1373-88. PubMed ID: 16838127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The prognostic value of calcification and impaired valve motion in combined aortic stenosis and coronary artery disease.
    Eitz T; Kleikamp G; Minami K; Körfer R
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2002 Sep; 11(5):713-8. PubMed ID: 12358410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. On the opening mechanism of the aortic valve: some observations from simulations.
    Howard IC; Patterson EA; Yoxall A
    J Med Eng Technol; 2003; 27(6):259-66. PubMed ID: 14602517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Stentless bioprostheses improve postoperative coronary flow more than stented prostheses after valve replacement for aortic stenosis.
    Bakhtiary F; Schiemann M; Dzemali O; Wittlinger T; Doss M; Ackermann H; Moritz A; Kleine P
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2006 Apr; 131(4):883-8. PubMed ID: 16580448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Prediction of pressure recovery location in aortic valve stenosis: an in-vitro validation study.
    Rhodes KD; Stroml JA; Rahman MM; VanAuker MD
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2007 Sep; 16(5):489-94. PubMed ID: 17944120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Predicting ATS Open Pivot heart valve performance with computational fluid dynamics.
    Dumont K; Vierendeels JA; Segers P; Van Nooten GJ; Verdonck PR
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2005 May; 14(3):393-9. PubMed ID: 15974535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Experimental measurement of dynamic fluid shear stress on the ventricular surface of the aortic valve leaflet.
    Yap CH; Saikrishnan N; Yoganathan AP
    Biomech Model Mechanobiol; 2012 Jan; 11(1-2):231-44. PubMed ID: 21465260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Dynamic simulation pericardial bioprosthetic heart valve function.
    Kim H; Lu J; Sacks MS; Chandran KB
    J Biomech Eng; 2006 Oct; 128(5):717-24. PubMed ID: 16995758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. [Flow through the mitral and aortic ostium quantified with magnetic resonance velocity measurement].
    Søndergaard L; Thomsen C; Ståhlberg F; Gymoese E; Lindvig K; Hildebrandt PR; Henriksen O
    Ugeskr Laeger; 1993 Apr; 155(17):1297-301. PubMed ID: 8506579
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. [Doppler echocardiographic determination of aortic valve gradients].
    Kronik G; Siostrzonek P; Zangeneh M; Schmoliner R; Gössinger H; Mösslacher H
    Wien Klin Wochenschr; 1987 Oct; 99(20):712-5. PubMed ID: 2961132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Transcription factor Egr-1 in calcific aortic valve disease.
    Ghazvini-Boroujerdi M; Clark J; Narula N; Palmatory E; Connolly JM; DeFelice S; Xu J; Jian B; Hazelwood S; Levy RJ
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2004 Nov; 13(6):894-903. PubMed ID: 15597579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Systemic pressure does not directly affect pressure gradient and valve area estimates in aortic stenosis in vitro.
    Mascherbauer J; Fuchs C; Stoiber M; Schima H; Pernicka E; Maurer G; Baumgartner H
    Eur Heart J; 2008 Aug; 29(16):2049-57. PubMed ID: 18502739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Effect of Left and Right Coronary Flow Waveforms on Aortic Sinus Hemodynamics and Leaflet Shear Stress: Correlation with Calcification Locations.
    Flemister DC; Hatoum H; Guhan V; Zebhi B; Lincoln J; Crestanello J; Dasi LP
    Ann Biomed Eng; 2020 Dec; 48(12):2796-2808. PubMed ID: 33145675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.