BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

413 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20525629)

  • 41. Integrating fossil preservation biases in the selection of calibrations for molecular divergence time estimation.
    Dornburg A; Beaulieu JM; Oliver JC; Near TJ
    Syst Biol; 2011 Jul; 60(4):519-27. PubMed ID: 21436104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Patterns of macroevolution among Primates inferred from a supermatrix of mitochondrial and nuclear DNA.
    Fabre PH; Rodrigues A; Douzery EJ
    Mol Phylogenet Evol; 2009 Dec; 53(3):808-25. PubMed ID: 19682589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Angiosperm divergence times: the effect of genes, codon positions, and time constraints.
    Magallón SA; Sanderson MJ
    Evolution; 2005 Aug; 59(8):1653-70. PubMed ID: 16329238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. A comparison of global, gene-specific, and relaxed clock methods in a comparative genomics framework: dating the polyploid history of soybean (Glycine max).
    Egan AN; Doyle J
    Syst Biol; 2010 Oct; 59(5):534-47. PubMed ID: 20705909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Molecular claims of Gondwanan age for Australian agamid lizards are untenable.
    Hugall AF; Lee MS
    Mol Biol Evol; 2004 Nov; 21(11):2102-10. PubMed ID: 15297599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. The impact of calibration and clock-model choice on molecular estimates of divergence times.
    Duchêne S; Lanfear R; Ho SY
    Mol Phylogenet Evol; 2014 Sep; 78():277-89. PubMed ID: 24910154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. The effects of fossil placement and calibration on divergence times and rates: an example from the termites (Insecta: Isoptera).
    Ware JL; Grimaldi DA; Engel MS
    Arthropod Struct Dev; 2010; 39(2-3):204-19. PubMed ID: 19962450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Mitogenomic perspectives on the origin and phylogeny of living amphibians.
    Zhang P; Zhou H; Chen YQ; Liu YF; Qu LH
    Syst Biol; 2005 Jun; 54(3):391-400. PubMed ID: 16012106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Estimating divergence times in phylogenetic trees without a molecular clock.
    Britton T
    Syst Biol; 2005 Jun; 54(3):500-7. PubMed ID: 16012115
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. [Molecular dating in the genomic era].
    Douzery EJ; Delsuc F; Philippe H
    Med Sci (Paris); 2006 Apr; 22(4):374-80. PubMed ID: 16597406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Testing the molecular clock using mechanistic models of fossil preservation and molecular evolution.
    Warnock RCM; Yang Z; Donoghue PCJ
    Proc Biol Sci; 2017 Jun; 284(1857):. PubMed ID: 28637852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Evolutionary rate variation among vertebrate beta globin genes: implications for dating gene family duplication events.
    Aguileta G; Bielawski JP; Yang Z
    Gene; 2006 Sep; 380(1):21-9. PubMed ID: 16843621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Evaluation of Bayesian models of substitution rate evolution--parental guidance versus mutual independence.
    Linder M; Britton T; Sennblad B
    Syst Biol; 2011 May; 60(3):329-42. PubMed ID: 21386113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Systematics of the lizard family pygopodidae with implications for the diversification of Australian temperate biotas.
    Jennings WB; Pianka ER; Donnellan S
    Syst Biol; 2003 Dec; 52(6):757-80. PubMed ID: 14668116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Phylotranscriptomics to bring the understudied into the fold: monophyletic ostracoda, fossil placement, and pancrustacean phylogeny.
    Oakley TH; Wolfe JM; Lindgren AR; Zaharoff AK
    Mol Biol Evol; 2013 Jan; 30(1):215-33. PubMed ID: 22977117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. The impact of the representation of fossil calibrations on Bayesian estimation of species divergence times.
    Inoue J; Donoghue PC; Yang Z
    Syst Biol; 2010 Jan; 59(1):74-89. PubMed ID: 20525621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Estimation of divergence times in cnidarian evolution based on mitochondrial protein-coding genes and the fossil record.
    Park E; Hwang DS; Lee JS; Song JI; Seo TK; Won YJ
    Mol Phylogenet Evol; 2012 Jan; 62(1):329-45. PubMed ID: 22040765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Critiquing blind dating: the dangers of over-confident date estimates in comparative genomics.
    Wheat CW; Wahlberg N
    Trends Ecol Evol; 2013 Nov; 28(11):636-42. PubMed ID: 23973265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Mitochondrial phylogenetics and evolution of mysticete whales.
    Sasaki T; Nikaido M; Hamilton H; Goto M; Kato H; Kanda N; Pastene L; Cao Y; Fordyce R; Hasegawa M; Okada N
    Syst Biol; 2005 Feb; 54(1):77-90. PubMed ID: 15805012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Caveats on the use of fossil calibrations for molecular dating: a comment on Near et al.
    Parham JF; Irmis RB
    Am Nat; 2008 Jan; 171(1):132-6; author reply 137-40. PubMed ID: 18171158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 21.