These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

243 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20525730)

  • 1. Sub-AQUA: real-value quality assessment of protein structure models.
    Yang YD; Spratt P; Chen H; Park C; Kihara D
    Protein Eng Des Sel; 2010 Aug; 23(8):617-32. PubMed ID: 20525730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Estimating quality of template-based protein models by alignment stability.
    Chen H; Kihara D
    Proteins; 2008 May; 71(3):1255-74. PubMed ID: 18041762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. FragQA: predicting local fragment quality of a sequence-structure alignment.
    Gao X; Bu D; Li SC; Xu J; Li M
    Genome Inform; 2007; 19():27-39. PubMed ID: 18546502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Structure-dependent sequence alignment for remotely related proteins.
    Yang AS
    Bioinformatics; 2002 Dec; 18(12):1658-65. PubMed ID: 12490451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. MetaMQAP: a meta-server for the quality assessment of protein models.
    Pawlowski M; Gajda MJ; Matlak R; Bujnicki JM
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2008 Sep; 9():403. PubMed ID: 18823532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Fr-TM-align: a new protein structural alignment method based on fragment alignments and the TM-score.
    Pandit SB; Skolnick J
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2008 Dec; 9():531. PubMed ID: 19077267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Assessment of protein model structure accuracy estimation in CASP13: Challenges in the era of deep learning.
    Won J; Baek M; Monastyrskyy B; Kryshtafovych A; Seok C
    Proteins; 2019 Dec; 87(12):1351-1360. PubMed ID: 31436360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Protein structure validation by generalized linear model root-mean-square deviation prediction.
    Bagaria A; Jaravine V; Huang YJ; Montelione GT; Güntert P
    Protein Sci; 2012 Feb; 21(2):229-38. PubMed ID: 22113924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A further leap of improvement in tertiary structure prediction in CASP13 prompts new routes for future assessments.
    Abriata LA; Tamò GE; Dal Peraro M
    Proteins; 2019 Dec; 87(12):1100-1112. PubMed ID: 31344267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Multiple structure alignment by optimal RMSD implies that the average structure is a consensus.
    Wang X; Snoeyink J
    Comput Syst Bioinformatics Conf; 2006; ():79-87. PubMed ID: 17369627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. How well can the accuracy of comparative protein structure models be predicted?
    Eramian D; Eswar N; Shen MY; Sali A
    Protein Sci; 2008 Nov; 17(11):1881-93. PubMed ID: 18832340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Predicting local quality of a sequence-structure alignment.
    Gao X; Xu J; Li SC; Li M
    J Bioinform Comput Biol; 2009 Oct; 7(5):789-810. PubMed ID: 19785046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Quality assessment of modeled protein structure using physicochemical properties.
    Rana PS; Sharma H; Bhattacharya M; Shukla A
    J Bioinform Comput Biol; 2015 Apr; 13(2):1550005. PubMed ID: 25524475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Analysis and prediction of functional sub-types from protein sequence alignments.
    Hannenhalli SS; Russell RB
    J Mol Biol; 2000 Oct; 303(1):61-76. PubMed ID: 11021970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Consensus alignment for reliable framework prediction in homology modeling.
    Prasad JC; Comeau SR; Vajda S; Camacho CJ
    Bioinformatics; 2003 Sep; 19(13):1682-91. PubMed ID: 12967965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Assessment of model accuracy estimations in CASP12.
    Kryshtafovych A; Monastyrskyy B; Fidelis K; Schwede T; Tramontano A
    Proteins; 2018 Mar; 86 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):345-360. PubMed ID: 28833563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Template-based protein structure prediction in CASP11 and retrospect of I-TASSER in the last decade.
    Yang J; Zhang W; He B; Walker SE; Zhang H; Govindarajoo B; Virtanen J; Xue Z; Shen HB; Zhang Y
    Proteins; 2016 Sep; 84 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):233-46. PubMed ID: 26343917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Large-scale assessment of the utility of low-resolution protein structures for biochemical function assignment.
    Arakaki AK; Zhang Y; Skolnick J
    Bioinformatics; 2004 May; 20(7):1087-96. PubMed ID: 14764543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Improved protein structure selection using decoy-dependent discriminatory functions.
    Wang K; Fain B; Levitt M; Samudrala R
    BMC Struct Biol; 2004 Jun; 4():8. PubMed ID: 15207004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Real value prediction of protein solvent accessibility using enhanced PSSM features.
    Chang DT; Huang HY; Syu YT; Wu CP
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2008 Dec; 9 Suppl 12(Suppl 12):S12. PubMed ID: 19091011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.