These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

193 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20526152)

  • 1. Microdecompressive laminatomy with a 5-year follow-up period for severe lumbar spinal stenosis.
    Celik SE; Celik S; Göksu K; Kara A; Ince I
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2010 Jun; 23(4):229-35. PubMed ID: 20526152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Bilateral versus unilateral interlaminar approach for bilateral decompression in patients with single-level degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis: a multicenter retrospective study of 175 patients on postoperative pain, functional disability, and patient satisfaction.
    den Boogert HF; Keers JC; Marinus Oterdoom DL; Kuijlen JM
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2015 Sep; 23(3):326-35. PubMed ID: 26091439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Outcome after less-invasive decompression of lumbar spinal stenosis: a randomized comparison of unilateral laminotomy, bilateral laminotomy, and laminectomy.
    Thomé C; Zevgaridis D; Leheta O; Bäzner H; Pöckler-Schöniger C; Wöhrle J; Schmiedek P
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2005 Aug; 3(2):129-41. PubMed ID: 16370302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Long-term clinical and radiological postoperative outcomes after an interspinous microdecompression of degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis.
    Jalil Y; Carvalho C; Becker R
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2014 Mar; 39(5):368-73. PubMed ID: 24365893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Computed tomography after laminectomy for lumbar spinal stenosis. Patients' pain patterns, walking capacity, and subjective disability had no correlation with computed tomography findings.
    Herno A; Airaksinen O; Saari T
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1994 Sep; 19(17):1975-8. PubMed ID: 7997932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Outcomes after decompressive laminectomy for lumbar spinal stenosis: comparison between minimally invasive unilateral laminectomy for bilateral decompression and open laminectomy: clinical article.
    Mobbs RJ; Li J; Sivabalan P; Raley D; Rao PJ
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2014 Aug; 21(2):179-86. PubMed ID: 24878273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A comparison of unilateral and bilateral laminotomies for decompression of L4-L5 spinal stenosis.
    Hong SW; Choi KY; Ahn Y; Baek OK; Wang JC; Lee SH; Lee HY
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2011 Feb; 36(3):E172-8. PubMed ID: 21192307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Postoperative outcome after modified unilateral-approach microendoscopic midline decompression for degenerative spinal stenosis.
    Yagi M; Okada E; Ninomiya K; Kihara M
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2009 Apr; 10(4):293-9. PubMed ID: 19441985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Bilateral operation of lumbar degenerative central spinal stenosis in full-endoscopic interlaminar technique with unilateral approach: prospective 2-year results of 74 patients.
    Komp M; Hahn P; Merk H; Godolias G; Ruetten S
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2011 Jul; 24(5):281-7. PubMed ID: 20975592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Clinical outcome of microscopic lumbar spinous process-splitting laminectomy: clinical article.
    Nomura H; Yanagisawa Y; Arima J; Oga M
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2014 Aug; 21(2):187-94. PubMed ID: 24878270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Modified unilateral laminotomy for bilateral decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis: technical note.
    Liu X; Yuan S; Tian Y
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 May; 38(12):E732-7. PubMed ID: 23466507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Lumbar spinal stenosis: prognostic factors for bilateral microsurgical decompression using a unilateral approach.
    Papavero L; Thiel M; Fritzsche E; Kunze C; Westphal M; Kothe R
    Neurosurgery; 2009 Dec; 65(6 Suppl):182-7; discussion187. PubMed ID: 19934993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Midterm outcome after unilateral approach for bilateral decompression of lumbar spinal stenosis: 5-year prospective study.
    Cavuşoğlu H; Kaya RA; Türkmenoglu ON; Tuncer C; Colak I; Aydin Y
    Eur Spine J; 2007 Dec; 16(12):2133-42. PubMed ID: 17712577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The degree of decompressive relief and its relation to clinical outcome in patients undergoing surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis.
    Herno A; Saari T; Suomalainen O; Airaksinen O
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1999 May; 24(10):1010-4. PubMed ID: 10332794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Influence of depression symptoms on patient expectations and clinical outcomes in the surgical management of spinal stenosis.
    Urban-Baeza A; Zárate-Kalfópulos B; Romero-Vargas S; Obil-Chavarría C; Brenes-Rojas L; Reyes-Sánchez A
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2015 Jan; 22(1):75-9. PubMed ID: 25380536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Modified Marmot operation versus spinous process transverse cutting laminectomy for lumbar spinal stenosis.
    Kawakami M; Nakao S; Fukui D; Kadosaka Y; Matsuoka T; Yamada H
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 Nov; 38(23):E1461-8. PubMed ID: 23778375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Minimum 10-year outcome of decompressive laminectomy for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis.
    Iguchi T; Kurihara A; Nakayama J; Sato K; Kurosaka M; Yamasaki K
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2000 Jul; 25(14):1754-9. PubMed ID: 10888941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Unilateral approach for bilateral decompression of lumbar spinal stenosis: a minimal invasive surgery.
    Usman M; Ali M; Khanzada K; Ishaq M; Naeem-ul-Haq ; Aman R; Ali M
    J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2013 Dec; 23(12):852-6. PubMed ID: 24304987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Computed tomography findings 4 years after surgical management of lumbar spinal stenosis. No correlation with clinical outcome.
    Herno A; Airaksinen O; Saari T; Pitkänen M; Manninen H; Suomalainen O
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1999 Nov; 24(21):2234-9. PubMed ID: 10562990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A Comparison of Bilateral Decompression via Unilateral Approach and Classic Laminectomy in Patients with Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A retrospective Clinical Study.
    Yaman O; Ozdemir N; Dagli AT; Acar E; Dalbayrak S; Temiz C
    Turk Neurosurg; 2015; 25(2):239-45. PubMed ID: 26014006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.