114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20526300)
1. Stem cell decision could rewrite rules of patentability.
Katsnelson A
Nat Med; 2010 Jun; 16(6):619. PubMed ID: 20526300
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Stem-cell patents confirmed.
Hayden EC
Nature; 2008 Mar; 452(7185):265. PubMed ID: 18354442
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Intellectual property. U.S. Patent Office casts doubt on Wisconsin stem cell patents.
Holden C
Science; 2007 Apr; 316(5822):182. PubMed ID: 17431141
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The paths around stem cell intellectual property.
Taymor KS; Scott CT; Greely HT
Nat Biotechnol; 2006 Apr; 24(4):411-3. PubMed ID: 16601720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Europe rules against stem-cell patents.
Abbott A
Nature; 2011 Mar; 471(7338):280. PubMed ID: 21412307
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Patenting the obvious?
Check E
Nature; 2007 May; 447(7140):16-7. PubMed ID: 17476235
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Science and law. Intellectual property and human embryonic stem cell research.
Loring JF; Campbell C
Science; 2006 Mar; 311(5768):1716-7. PubMed ID: 16556826
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Biomedical patents. Wisconsin stem cell patents upheld.
Holden C
Science; 2008 Mar; 319(5870):1602-3. PubMed ID: 18356497
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Patentability of stem cells in Europe following the Brüstle decision.
Stötter G
Pharm Pat Anal; 2012 Nov; 1(5):521-3. PubMed ID: 24236919
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. A call to legal arms: bringing embryonic stem cell therapies to market.
Miller J
Albany Law J Sci Technol; 2003; 13(2):555-92. PubMed ID: 15199929
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Stem cells caught in morality clause.
Siva N
Nat Biotechnol; 2009 Feb; 27(2):109. PubMed ID: 19204675
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Intellectual property. Groups challenge key stem cell patents.
Kintisch E
Science; 2006 Jul; 313(5785):281. PubMed ID: 16857907
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The evolution of patents on life--transgenic animals, clones and stem cells.
Woessner WD
J Pat Trademark Off Soc; 2001 Nov; 83(11):830-44. PubMed ID: 12962089
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Companies balk at California's patent rules for stem cell research.
Keim B
Nat Med; 2007 Jan; 13(1):6. PubMed ID: 17206112
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. European patents. Tough stance on stem cell, DNA claims.
Vogel G
Science; 2002 Aug; 297(5582):754-5. PubMed ID: 12161624
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. EU bans embryonic stem cell patents but decision may have limited implications.
Harrison C
Nat Rev Drug Discov; 2011 Nov; 10(12):892-3. PubMed ID: 22076510
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Ethical concerns block widespread patenting of embryonic advances.
Regalado A; Louis M
Wall St J (East Ed); 2001 Aug; ():B1, B4. PubMed ID: 12159909
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. New guidance on the patentability of embryonic stem cell patents in Europe.
Fitt R
Nat Biotechnol; 2009 Apr; 27(4):338-9. PubMed ID: 19352367
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Bush vetoes bill to loosen policy on stem-cell research.
Kean S
Chron High Educ; 2006 Jul; 52(47):A17. PubMed ID: 17115488
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Stem cells. Prominent researchers join the attack on stem cell patents.
Holden C
Science; 2007 Jul; 317(5835):187. PubMed ID: 17626857
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
