These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20526693)

  • 1. Scientific forensics: how the Office of Research Integrity can assist institutional investigations of research misconduct during oversight review.
    Dahlberg JE; Davidian NM
    Sci Eng Ethics; 2010 Dec; 16(4):713-35. PubMed ID: 20526693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Incarceration, restitution, and lifetime debarment: legal consequences of scientific misconduct in the Eric Poehlman case: Commentary on: "Scientific forensics: how the office of research integrity can assist institutional investigations of research misconduct during oversight review".
    Tilden SJ
    Sci Eng Ethics; 2010 Dec; 16(4):737-41. PubMed ID: 20842537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The Essential Need for Research Misconduct Allegation Audits.
    Loikith L; Bauchwitz R
    Sci Eng Ethics; 2016 Aug; 22(4):1027-1049. PubMed ID: 27349911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Scientific misconduct and research integrity for the bench scientist.
    Pascal CB
    Proc Soc Exp Biol Med; 2000 Sep; 224(4):220-30. PubMed ID: 10964256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Office of Research Integrity: a reflection of disputes and misunderstandings.
    Scheetz MD
    Croat Med J; 1999 Sep; 40(3):321-5. PubMed ID: 10523125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Walters and Richards comment on the examination of terminal digits of questioned data as used by the Office of Research Integrity (ORI) of the Public Health Service in misconduct cases.
    Mosimann JE
    IEEE Eng Med Biol Mag; 2002; 21(6):8-9; author reply 9-11. PubMed ID: 12613205
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Scientific misconduct and research integrity: federal definitions and approaches.
    Pascal CB
    Prof Ethics; 1999; 7(1):9-32. PubMed ID: 12569921
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Toward global standardization of conducting fair investigations of allegations of research misconduct.
    Nouchi R; Aihara H; Arie F; Asashima M; Daida H; Fudano J; Fujiwara Y; Fushiki S; Geller RJ; Hatano K; Homma T; Kimura M; Kuroki T; Miki K; Morita I; Nitta K; Shinohara A; Siomi MC; Yoshida M; Ichikawa I
    Account Res; 2020 Aug; 27(6):327-346. PubMed ID: 32223327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Scientific fraud and misconduct.
    Klein DF
    J Clin Psychopharmacol; 1991 Dec; 11(6):337-8. PubMed ID: 1663134
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Anonymity and pseudonymity in whistleblowing to the U.S. Office of Research Integrity.
    Price AR
    Acad Med; 1998 May; 73(5):467-72. PubMed ID: 9609854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Improving the scientific misconduct hearing process.
    Parrish DM
    JAMA; 1997 Apr 23-30; 277(16):1315-9. PubMed ID: 9109472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Complainant issues in research misconduct: the office of research integrity experience.
    Pascal CB
    Exp Biol Med (Maywood); 2006 Jul; 231(7):1264-70. PubMed ID: 16816133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Research misconduct and its federal regulation: the origin and history of the Office of Research Integrity--with personal views by ORI's former associate director for investigative oversight.
    Price AR
    Account Res; 2013; 20(5-6):291-319. PubMed ID: 24028479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. ORI findings of scientific misconduct in clinical trials and publicly funded research, 1992-2002.
    Reynolds SM
    Clin Trials; 2004; 1(6):509-16. PubMed ID: 16279291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. What is Recklessness in Scientific Research? The Frank Sauer Case.
    Resnik DB; Smith EM; Chen SH; Goller C
    Account Res; 2017; 24(8):497-502. PubMed ID: 29106296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Historical model for editor and Office of Research Integrity cooperation in handling allegations, investigation, and retraction in a contentious (Abbs) case of research misconduct.
    Price AR; Daroff RB
    Account Res; 2015; 22(2):63-80. PubMed ID: 25397599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Safeguards added for appeals in misconduct cases.
    Anderson C
    Nature; 1992 Nov; 360(6401):202. PubMed ID: 1331812
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Research misconduct: Can Australia learn from the UK's stuttering system?
    Marcovitch H
    Med J Aust; 2006 Dec 4-18; 185(11-12):616-8. PubMed ID: 17181505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Australia needs an office of academic integrity.
    Hall BM
    Med J Aust; 2006 Dec 4-18; 185(11-12):619-22. PubMed ID: 17181506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Rooting out scientific misconduct.
    Oransky I; Redman B
    Science; 2024 Jan; 383(6679):131. PubMed ID: 38207024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.