337 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20526958)
1. The case for evidence-based rulemaking in human subjects research.
Sachs B
Am J Bioeth; 2010 Jun; 10(6):3-13. PubMed ID: 20526958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Ethical rules for human subjects research: a case where the "is" must inform the "ought".
Kon AA
Am J Bioeth; 2010 Jun; 10(6):14-5. PubMed ID: 20526960
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Ethical rules, policies, or guidance?
Macklin R
Am J Bioeth; 2010 Jun; 10(6):1-2. PubMed ID: 20526956
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Rethinking research ethics.
Rhodes R
Am J Bioeth; 2005; 5(1):7-28. PubMed ID: 16036651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A quartet of criticisms.
Vanderpool HY
Am J Bioeth; 2005; 5(5):16-9. PubMed ID: 16179299
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. In defense of valid design as a policy rule.
Evans EL
Am J Bioeth; 2010 Jun; 10(6):18-9. PubMed ID: 20526962
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Undue inducement: nonsense on stilts?
Emanuel EJ
Am J Bioeth; 2005; 5(5):9-13; discussion W8-11, W17. PubMed ID: 16179296
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. How not to rethink research ethics.
Beauchamp TL
Am J Bioeth; 2005; 5(1):31-3; author reply W15-8. PubMed ID: 16036653
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Rethinking research ethics.
Rhodes R
Am J Bioeth; 2010 Oct; 10(10):19-36. PubMed ID: 20945264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. An absence of evidence in "evidence-based rulemaking".
Gerson J; Goodman SN
Am J Bioeth; 2010 Jun; 10(6):22-3. PubMed ID: 20526964
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. An ethically justified framework for clinical investigation to benefit pregnant and fetal patients.
Chervenak FA; McCullough LB
Am J Bioeth; 2011 May; 11(5):39-49. PubMed ID: 21534151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Response to open peer commentaries on "The case for evidence-based rulemaking".
Sachs B
Am J Bioeth; 2010 Jun; 10(6):W1-3. PubMed ID: 20526957
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Committees for Ethics in Research involving human subjects.
Hossne WS; Vieira S; De Freitas CB
J Int Bioethique; 2008; 19(1-2):131-41, 200. PubMed ID: 18664006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Going from principles to rules in research ethics.
Sachs B
Bioethics; 2011 Jan; 25(1):9-20. PubMed ID: 19659855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Research ethics guidelines: partly different requirements in various types of trials].
Nilstun T; Löfmark R
Lakartidningen; 2005 Oct 10-16; 102(41):2932-4, 2937. PubMed ID: 16294510
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. The perverse consequences of a proposed global tax on research.
MacDonald C; Walton N
Am J Bioeth; 2010 Jun; 10(6):46-7. PubMed ID: 20526972
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Public trust as a policy goal for research with human subjects.
Resnik DB
Am J Bioeth; 2010 Jun; 10(6):15-7. PubMed ID: 20526961
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Undue inducement: the only objection to payment?
VanderWalde A
Am J Bioeth; 2005; 5(5):25-7. PubMed ID: 16179303
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. "Undue inducement' as coercive offers.
McGregor J
Am J Bioeth; 2005; 5(5):24-5. PubMed ID: 16179302
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. The role and responsibilities of witnesses in the informed consent process.
Angeles-Llerenas AR; Wirtz V; Lara-Alvarez CF
Dev World Bioeth; 2009 Apr; 9(1):18-25. PubMed ID: 18370932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
