These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
206 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20526963)
21. Informed consent for pediatric research: is it really possible? Kodish E J Pediatr; 2003 Feb; 142(2):89-90. PubMed ID: 12584521 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. The need to explicate the ethical evaluation tools to avoid ethical inflation. Bernabe RD; van Thiel GJ; Raaijmakers JA; van Delden JJ Am J Bioeth; 2009 Nov; 9(11):56-8. PubMed ID: 19882462 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Evaluating empirical assessments of social risk. Schonfeld T; Brown JS Am J Bioeth; 2009 Nov; 9(11):55-6. PubMed ID: 19882461 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Committees for Ethics in Research involving human subjects. Hossne WS; Vieira S; De Freitas CB J Int Bioethique; 2008; 19(1-2):131-41, 200. PubMed ID: 18664006 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Sham surgery in randomized trials: additional requirements should be satisfied. Mann H Am J Bioeth; 2003; 3(4):W5-W7. PubMed ID: 14744304 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. How not to rethink research ethics. Beauchamp TL Am J Bioeth; 2005; 5(1):31-3; author reply W15-8. PubMed ID: 16036653 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. An innovative paradigm for clinical research. Rhodes R Am J Bioeth; 2003; 3(4):59-61. PubMed ID: 14744338 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Adolescents as doubly-vulnerable research subjects. Kopelman LM Am J Bioeth; 2004; 4(1):50-2. PubMed ID: 15035950 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. A plea for pragmatism in clinical research ethics. Brendel DH; Miller FG Am J Bioeth; 2008 Apr; 8(4):24-31. PubMed ID: 18576248 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Regional ethics organizations for protection of human research participants. Wood A; Grady C; Emanuel EJ Nat Med; 2004 Dec; 10(12):1283-8. PubMed ID: 15580245 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Why the ethical justification of randomized clinical trials is a scientific question. Shamy M; Fedyk M J Clin Epidemiol; 2018 May; 97():126-132. PubMed ID: 29306064 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. When "minimal risk" research yields clinically-significant data, maybe the risks aren't so minimal. Sharp HM; Orr RD Am J Bioeth; 2004; 4(2):W32-6. PubMed ID: 15186687 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Making pragmatism practicable for the institutional review board. Robertson C Am J Bioeth; 2008 Apr; 8(4):49-51. PubMed ID: 18576258 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Ethical rules for human subjects research: a case where the "is" must inform the "ought". Kon AA Am J Bioeth; 2010 Jun; 10(6):14-5. PubMed ID: 20526960 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Testing therapies less effective than the best current standard: ethical beliefs in an international sample of researchers. Kent DM; Mwamburi M; Cash RA; Rabin TL; Bennish ML Am J Bioeth; 2003; 3(2):W11. PubMed ID: 14635629 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Science and behavior. Ubel PA; Silbergleit R Am J Bioeth; 2011 Feb; 11(2):W1-2. PubMed ID: 21337265 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Equipoise, research stalemates, and the limits of new data. London AJ Am J Bioeth; 2011 Feb; 11(2):10-2. PubMed ID: 21337268 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. A taxonomy of value in clinical research. Casarett DJ; Karlawish JH; Moreno JD IRB; 2002; 24(6):1-6. PubMed ID: 12683394 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Is a placebo-controlled surgical trial an oxymoron? Boyle K; Batzer FR J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2007; 14(3):278-83. PubMed ID: 17478356 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]