26 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20527757)
1. Impact of nanoplastics on membrane scaling and fouling in reverse osmosis desalination process.
Yang Q; Zhang J; Zhang N; Wang D; Yuan X; Tang CY; Gao B; Wang Z
Water Res; 2024 Feb; 249():120945. PubMed ID: 38043352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Modification of the distribution of humic acid complexations by introducing microbubbles to membrane distillation process for effective membrane fouling alleviation.
Wang X; Li P; Ye Y; Xu C; Liu Y; Li E; Xia Q; Hou L; Yu S
J Environ Manage; 2023 Dec; 348():119171. PubMed ID: 37832287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Differences in the Effect of Mn
Gao Q; Duan L; Jia Y; Zhang H; Liu J; Yang W
Membranes (Basel); 2023 Oct; 13(10):. PubMed ID: 37887995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Mitigation of reverse osmosis membrane fouling by coagulation pretreatment to remove silica and transparent exopolymer particles.
Sun X; Duan L; Liu Z; Gao Q; Liu J; Zhang D
Environ Res; 2024 Jan; 241():117569. PubMed ID: 37925125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Non-destructive monitoring and prediction of fouling by organic matters and residual anionic coagulant during membrane process.
Im HR; Kim CM; Choi PJ; Jang A
Chemosphere; 2024 May; 356():141778. PubMed ID: 38554864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Adsorptive chito-beads for control of membrane fouling.
Choi SJ; Osman A; Kim S; Kang S; Hwang DS
Carbohydr Polym; 2024 Mar; 327():121642. PubMed ID: 38171670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Dynamic Modeling of Fouling in Reverse Osmosis Membranes.
Ling B; Xie P; Ladner D; Battiato I
Membranes (Basel); 2021 May; 11(5):. PubMed ID: 34068543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Chain architectures of various cellulose-based antiscalants on the inhibition of calcium carbonate scale.
Yu W; Yang H
Sci Rep; 2020 Dec; 10(1):21906. PubMed ID: 33318513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Seawater pretreatment for reverse osmosis: chemistry, contaminants, and coagulation.
Edzwald JK; Haarhoff J
Water Res; 2011 Nov; 45(17):5428-40. PubMed ID: 21907384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A review of reverse osmosis membrane fouling and control strategies.
Jiang S; Li Y; Ladewig BP
Sci Total Environ; 2017 Oct; 595():567-583. PubMed ID: 28399496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Humic Acid fouling mitigation by antiscalant in reverse osmosis system.
Yang Q; Liu Y; Li Y
Environ Sci Technol; 2010 Jul; 44(13):5153-8. PubMed ID: 20527757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Studies on the effect of humic acids and phenol on adsorption-ultrafiltration process performance.
Mozia S; Tomaszewska M; Morawski AW
Water Res; 2005; 39(2-3):501-9. PubMed ID: 15644259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Fouling of reverse osmosis and nanofiltration membranes by dairy industry effluents.
Turan M; Ates A; Inanc B
Water Sci Technol; 2002; 45(12):355-60. PubMed ID: 12201123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of humic acid rejection and flux decline during filtration with negatively charged and uncharged ultrafiltration membranes.
Shao J; Hou J; Song H
Water Res; 2011 Jan; 45(2):473-82. PubMed ID: 20863548
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Fouling characteristics of NF and RO operated for removal of dissolved matter from groundwater.
Gwon EM; Yu MJ; Oh HK; Ylee YH
Water Res; 2003 Jul; 37(12):2989-97. PubMed ID: 12767302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
