139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20527760)
1. A downhole passive sampling system to avoid bias and error from groundwater sample handling.
Britt SL; Parker BL; Cherry JA
Environ Sci Technol; 2010 Jul; 44(13):4917-23. PubMed ID: 20527760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A new design of groundwater sampling device and its application.
Tsai YJ; Kuo MC
J Environ Sci (China); 2005; 17(5):838-41. PubMed ID: 16313014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Design and field application of an automated cartridge sampler for VOC concentration and flux measurements.
Kuhn U; Dindorf T; Ammann C; Rottenberger S; Guyon P; Holzinger R; Ausma S; Kenntner T; Helleis F; Kesselmeier J
J Environ Monit; 2005 Jun; 7(6):568-76. PubMed ID: 15931416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Calibration and field performance of membrane-enclosed sorptive coating for integrative passive sampling of persistent organic pollutants in water.
Vrana B; Paschke A; Popp P
Environ Pollut; 2006 Nov; 144(1):296-307. PubMed ID: 16516361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of a novel passive sampler to standard water-column sampling for organic contaminants associated with wastewater effluents entering a New Jersey stream.
Alvarez DA; Stackelberg PE; Petty JD; Huckins JN; Furlong ET; Zaugg SD; Meyer MT
Chemosphere; 2005 Nov; 61(5):610-22. PubMed ID: 16219498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Polar organic chemical integrative sampler (POCIS): application for monitoring organic micropollutants in wastewater effluent and surface water.
Miège C; Budzinski H; Jacquet R; Soulier C; Pelte T; Coquery M
J Environ Monit; 2012 Feb; 14(2):626-35. PubMed ID: 22193508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Application of passive sampling devices for screening of micro-pollutants in marine aquaculture using LC-MS/MS.
Martínez Bueno MJ; Hernando MD; Agüera A; Fernández-Alba AR
Talanta; 2009 Feb; 77(4):1518-27. PubMed ID: 19084673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of the Chemcatcher and DGT passive samplers for monitoring metals with highly fluctuating water concentrations.
Allan IJ; Knutsson J; Guigues N; Mills GA; Fouillac AM; Greenwood R
J Environ Monit; 2007 Jul; 9(7):672-81. PubMed ID: 17607387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Assessment of a groundwater contamination with vinyl chloride (VC) and precursor volatile organic compounds (VOC) by use of a geographical information system (GIS).
Kistemann T; Hundhausen J; Herbst S; Classen T; Färber H
Int J Hyg Environ Health; 2008 Jul; 211(3-4):308-17. PubMed ID: 17869578
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Sorbent-based sampling methods for volatile and semi-volatile organic compounds in air Part 1: Sorbent-based air monitoring options.
Woolfenden E
J Chromatogr A; 2010 Apr; 1217(16):2674-84. PubMed ID: 20106481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation of the use of performance reference compounds in an Oasis-HLB adsorbent based passive sampler for improving water concentration estimates of polar herbicides in freshwater.
Mazzella N; Lissalde S; Moreira S; Delmas F; Mazellier P; Huckins JN
Environ Sci Technol; 2010 Mar; 44(5):1713-9. PubMed ID: 20108959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Review of passive accumulation devices for monitoring organic micropollutants in the aquatic environment.
Stuer-Lauridsen F
Environ Pollut; 2005 Aug; 136(3):503-24. PubMed ID: 15862404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A holistic passive integrative sampling approach for assessing the presence and potential impacts of waterborne environmental contaminants.
Petty JD; Huckins JN; Alvarez DA; Brumbaugh WG; Cranor WL; Gale RW; Rastall AC; Jones-Lepp TL; Leiker TJ; Rostad CE; Furlong ET
Chemosphere; 2004 Feb; 54(6):695-705. PubMed ID: 14602102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Risk assessment of exposure to volatile organic compounds in groundwater in Taiwan.
Fan C; Wang GS; Chen YC; Ko CH
Sci Total Environ; 2009 Mar; 407(7):2165-74. PubMed ID: 19167026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of two aquatic passive sampling configurations for their suitability in the analysis of estrogens in water.
Kuster M; De la Cal A; Eljarrat E; López de Alda MJ; Barceló D
Talanta; 2010 Dec; 83(2):493-9. PubMed ID: 21111164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Process sampling module coupled with purge and trap-GC-FID for in situ auto-monitoring of volatile organic compounds in wastewater.
Liu HW; Liu YT; Wu BZ; Nian HC; Chen HJ; Chiu KH; Lo JG
Talanta; 2009 Dec; 80(2):903-8. PubMed ID: 19836571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Field and laboratory arsenic speciation methods and their application to natural-water analysis.
Bednar AJ; Garbarino JR; Burkhardt MR; Ranville JF; Wildeman TR
Water Res; 2004 Jan; 38(2):355-64. PubMed ID: 14675647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Performance of a zerovalent iron reactive barrier for the treatment of arsenic in groundwater: Part 1. Hydrogeochemical studies.
Wilkin RT; Acree SD; Ross RR; Beak DG; Lee TR
J Contam Hydrol; 2009 Apr; 106(1-2):1-14. PubMed ID: 19167133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. New device for time-averaged measurement of volatile organic compounds (VOCs).
Santiago Sánchez N; Tejada Alarcón S; Tortajada Santonja R; Llorca-Pórcel J
Sci Total Environ; 2014 Jul; 485-486():720-725. PubMed ID: 24388502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Performance of semipermeable membrane devices for sampling of organic contaminants in groundwater.
Vrana B; Paschke H; Paschke A; Popp P; Schuurmann G
J Environ Monit; 2005 May; 7(5):500-8. PubMed ID: 15877173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
