These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

176 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20528994)

  • 41. Peer-assessment of medical communication skills: the impact of students' personality, academic and social reputation on behavioural assessment.
    Hulsman RL; Peters JF; Fabriek M
    Patient Educ Couns; 2013 Sep; 92(3):346-54. PubMed ID: 23916674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Near-peer teaching in an anatomy course with a low faculty-to-student ratio.
    Durán CE; Bahena EN; Rodríguez Mde L; Baca GJ; Uresti AS; Elizondo-Omaña RE; López SG
    Anat Sci Educ; 2012; 5(3):171-6. PubMed ID: 22383124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Differential effects of two types of formative assessment in predicting performance of first-year medical students.
    Krasne S; Wimmers PF; Relan A; Drake TA
    Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2006 May; 11(2):155-71. PubMed ID: 16729243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Use of Simulator-Based Teaching to Improve Medical Students' Knowledge and Competencies: Randomized Controlled Trial.
    Fischer Q; Sbissa Y; Nhan P; Adjedj J; Picard F; Mignon A; Varenne O
    J Med Internet Res; 2018 Sep; 20(9):e261. PubMed ID: 30249587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. The role for peer-assisted ultrasound teaching in medical school.
    Dickerson J; Paul K; Vila P; Whiticar R
    Clin Teach; 2017 Jun; 14(3):170-174. PubMed ID: 27350650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. The benefits of a peer-assisted mock PACES.
    Siddiqui S; Siddiqui S; Mustafa Q; Rizvi AF; Hossain IT
    Clin Teach; 2018 Jun; 15(3):221-225. PubMed ID: 28612515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Medical Students' Progress in Detecting and Interpreting Visual and Auditory Clinical Findings.
    Han H; Williams R; Hingle S; Klamen DL; Rull GM; Clark T; Daniels J
    Teach Learn Med; 2020; 32(4):380-388. PubMed ID: 32281403
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. An intensive medical education elective for senior medical students.
    Gainor J; Patel NK; George PF; MacNamara MM; Dollase R; Taylor JS
    R I Med J (2013); 2014 Jul; 97(7):40-4. PubMed ID: 24983021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Clinical biochemistry teaching: use of peer debriefing by Pendleton's rule as an instructional tool.
    Fatima SH; Liaquat A; Mansoor S; Rauf A; Fatima SS
    J Pak Med Assoc; 2020 Mar; 70(3):410-416. PubMed ID: 32207416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. The effect of peer-group size on the delivery of feedback in basic life support refresher training: a cluster randomized controlled trial.
    Cho Y; Je S; Yoon YS; Roh HR; Chang C; Kang H; Lim T
    BMC Med Educ; 2016 Jul; 16():167. PubMed ID: 27378162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. A randomised controlled trial of a blended learning education intervention for teaching evidence-based medicine.
    Ilic D; Nordin RB; Glasziou P; Tilson JK; Villanueva E
    BMC Med Educ; 2015 Mar; 15():39. PubMed ID: 25884717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Peer-assisted learning in the acquisition of clinical skills: a supplementary approach to musculoskeletal system training.
    Burke J; Fayaz S; Graham K; Matthew R; Field M
    Med Teach; 2007 Sep; 29(6):577-82. PubMed ID: 17978969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Delivery of a urology online course using Moodle versus didactic lectures methods.
    Reis LO; Ikari O; Taha-Neto KA; Gugliotta A; Denardi F
    Int J Med Inform; 2015 Feb; 84(2):149-54. PubMed ID: 25466380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Towards outcome-based programme evaluation: using student comparative self-assessments to determine teaching effectiveness.
    Raupach T; Münscher C; Beissbarth T; Burckhardt G; Pukrop T
    Med Teach; 2011; 33(8):e446-53. PubMed ID: 21774642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Evaluation of medical student retention of clinical skills following simulation training.
    Offiah G; Ekpotu LP; Murphy S; Kane D; Gordon A; O'Sullivan M; Sharifuddin SF; Hill ADK; Condron CM
    BMC Med Educ; 2019 Jul; 19(1):263. PubMed ID: 31311546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Peer-assisted learning in teaching clinical examination to junior medical students.
    Silbert BI; Lake FR
    Med Teach; 2012; 34(5):392-7. PubMed ID: 22471912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Utilizing Medical Students as Internal Assets to Enhance Gross Anatomy Laboratory Learning.
    Williams SE; Hawkins HG; Khalil MK
    Clin Anat; 2020 Mar; 33(2):286-292. PubMed ID: 31688953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Does video feedback analysis improve CPR performance in phase 5 medical students?
    Spence AD; Derbyshire S; Walsh IK; Murray JM
    BMC Med Educ; 2016 Aug; 16(1):203. PubMed ID: 27519273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Learning through multiple lenses: analysis of self, peer, near-peer and faculty assessment of a clinical history taking task in Australia.
    Fitzgerald K; Vaughan B
    J Educ Eval Health Prof; 2018; 15():22. PubMed ID: 30223639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Instructional authenticity and clinical reasoning in undergraduate medical education: a 2-year, prospective, randomized trial.
    Durning SJ; Dong T; Artino AR; LaRochelle J; Pangaro LN; van der Vleuten C; Schuwirth L
    Mil Med; 2012 Sep; 177(9 Suppl):38-43. PubMed ID: 23029859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.